Documents

Oral argument — Villegas v. Arbogast

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2021

I think they indicated that they met at the mall, although the time period is not clear. … And it was that act of fabrication that caused Mr.

Oral argument — Albert v. City of Peoria

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2018

However, would you agree that unless we would find there was frostbite initially, we'd never get to the intervening accident issue, period? … He says we don't do that, but, you know, there's been time when the maintenance workers cannot get there and employees will go in, you know, clean the drains.

Oral argument — M.H. v. Commissioner, Georgia Dept. of Community Health

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 23, 2024

So just one more, just kind of clean up on jurisdictional questions. … But the provision at play here, Your Honor, is EPSDT, early periodic screening diagnosis and treatment. And that provision specifically says you have to provide corrective and ameliorative treatment.

Oral argument — DairyAmerica, Inc. v. New York Marine and General In

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2010

During what period? It doesn't say what period. And that's the crucial issue. That clause never mentions a period of time. And that is controlled in every policy of insurance. … But the binder and I have a time period. And the policy and the binder have a time period. It's like imagine if you bought a collision policy for your car.

Oral argument — Peter Crane v. United States Nuclear Regulato

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2009

It was suggested by comments in this proceeding. … To the question, there is no basis under the Hobbs Act review for making a factual record. The record comes up from the agency. Mr. Crane is a thyroid cancer patient.

Oral argument — Oklahoma Firefighters Pension v. Finisar Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2015

Your Honor, all it says is that there was discussions over a three-month period of time. This is dynamic time period. The discussions are not finalized until December. … They don't have the air of suspicion in context.

Oral argument — Fennell v. Illinois Central Railroad Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2011

Halbach's comments, but that's not in the record in the court below. And that's very important to the plaintiff's case, as Judge Guido noted. … A party acting with clean hands in equity would bring their motion to the court promptly. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Do you have one more?

Oral argument — Occidental Fire & Casualty Co. v. Adam Soczynski

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2014

Hipp and Hipp's Trucking were acting under the authority of ATS, Airplane Transportation Services, the Great West insured here. … I've already commented that I believe that the trial judge was within his purview to say there have to really be genuine issues of fact here, and there really aren't.

Oral argument — Tejwaniv.Atty Gen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

It's taking dirty money and making it clean. … Stanton is correct, the Board, the President of the Circuit, Brasino, precludes a new period from restarting.

Oral argument — Lavigne v. Great Salt Bay Community School Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2024

She only discovered this when she was helping her child clean the child's room in preparation for a winter painting project. You just said day-by-day, there were day-by-day instances. … What about that makes it more plausible that before the social worker acted, there was some concerted custom or policy that had been actually developed, as opposed to the social worker just making a decision

Oral argument — Aldi, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2011

One is, is there an injury in 2004, period, to begin with, versus is there an injury in 2004 and one in 2007? … Especially in cases where we're dealing with repetitive trauma over a long period of time. And in this case, that's specifically what we have.

Oral argument — Lopez v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2024

The petitioner again conceded this at trial because he felt that Zogny and Adetiba, the matter of Adetiba, blocked his argument, and he's right again, committing several acts of larceny over a period of … So to give him the opportunity, he gives himself a clean slate to rewrite the law, and he just rewrites Zogny.

Oral argument — People v. Arrendondo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2020

It's the combination of the two factors defendant being asleep so that he wouldn't be able to act and that the, the gun was behind the door. … Seated air in that. And then I think one of the. Later questions or comments is that, you know, they don't know whether. He thought. He thought. He thought. Improperly that that prohibited.

Oral argument — Lair v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2007

There were discussions that took place between me and the agency attorney and it was just sort of left up in the air. … Do you think that he acted appropriately at all times?

Oral argument — Illinois Insurance Guaranty F v. Xavier Becerra

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2021

This case involves the Medicare Secondary Payer Act, or the MSP, and specifically whether the fund falls within the statutory definition of an applicable plan such that the fund has to submit periodic … My question is whether the government is telling us that that's a sufficient forum to air this issue out and have it decided.

Oral argument — Agere Sys Incetal v. Ad v. En v. Tech Corpetal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 22, 2009

Well, that's an interesting comment because if you read the opinion, which I'm sure you did, they had a 113 counterclaim. … So any other person means any other person, period. And as Your Honor pointed out in talking to Mr.

Oral argument — People v. Moore

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2018

The trial court aired... There was a charge that stated the offense. It was amended during trial, correct? Correct. We had a valid charge pre-trial, during trial. … The allegation that defendant with the requisite intent attempted to kill and murder unnamed victim was sufficient to describe an act which constituted a substantial step toward the commission of the murder

Oral argument — Susan Bender v. Champlain Enterprises LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 27, 2019

I represent Champlain Enterprises, LLC, doing business as Commute Air. I will refer to Appley as Commute Air, so there's no confusion. … And they say her standing up is insubordination when she's acting in the interest of aircraft and aircrew and the public safety.

Oral argument — Jason Krembel v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2020

And where do you get the waiver of the sovereign immunity under the Federal Tort Claims Act? How do you get this under the Federal Tort Claims Act? Well, under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Go ahead. … And it was that five-week period. And so essentially, Mr. Krimble's case is that during that five-week period, the BOP didn't ensure that I got my Mohs surgery done.

Oral argument — Adaeze Duncan v. International Markets Live

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2021

You cite to the act. Well, the act says if that you get a try it like you would go to a fact finder. … So we have established prejudice on that eight month time period before they finally decided to raise this and never once was it argued they needed more time.