Documents

Oral argument — Edgar v. Avaya Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2007

And the Court balanced those two competing interests by adopting a presumption of prudence whenever ESOP trustees act in accordance with the express ESOP purpose, which is to allow employees to acquire … Henson's comments about the fact that this plan is stricter than the plan in Munch. I was surprised to hear that because it simply isn't.

Oral argument — Burnsv.Pa Deptof Corrections

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2009

We're into other generations of commentators now. … That's what the temporal period and events here may suggest, according to the theory that has been articulated by the petitioner.

Oral argument — In Re Maxus Energy Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2022

I'll just give an example of the Lanham Act, Your Honors. … But comment 10 to Rule 1.7, right? This is existing throughout the time period of the relationship. And certainly the time she started interviewing in August of 2020.

Oral argument — Federal Trade Commission v. Shire Viropharma Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2018

There were comments posted on the public record, often at the request of the FDA. Why didn't the FTC act more quickly? Well, I've got a couple answers to that. … So there's that nine-month period.

Oral argument — Deweese v. Ntnl Railroad Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2009

all we are saying is that if Amtrak's counsel were there we're asleep switch probably still be sure making the same argument but it wouldn't be nearly as effective and you can look at the restatement comments … It was a period of time when there was a waiver and then it was brought back in by the General Assembly and I believe it was in the 70s your honor. That's the same as New Jersey.

Oral argument — S.H Vs. Lower Merion School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 24, 2013

So she was, for that period of time, which is the period of time for which we are seeking a remedy, a child with a disability, even though in fact it was learned later that she was not. … I'm hoping that this was just an error, but the comment by my colleague that the Americans with Disabilities Act is a spending clause statute, that's not correct.

Oral argument — Oberdorf v. Amazon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2020

Period. … Amazon acts essentially like a warehouse.

Oral argument — United States v. Hackensack Uni v. Med Ctr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

And this went over a period of several years. It went over a period of a couple years. Why would that be a jury question as to whether that was utter New Jersey law? … That's a word that my comment here doesn't touch. Is it received on a passive act? Yeah, I think it is pursued only in the sense of how you want the statute to work.

Oral argument — AriWeitznerV.SanofiPasteur,Inc,etal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2015

And did you say it's a 90-day period? You got to file within 90 days? It's filed within 90 days. And they didn't do so. They have every opportunity to do so. … I just have a couple more comments.

Oral argument — PPLCorp v. Comm Internal Revenue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2011

Companies Act profits, meet all three of those tests. Conceded by the commissioner that it meets all three tests? Indeed. That's what happened in the Entergy case. … The profits for the four-year period, the taxable period, 306 million pounds. The flotation value is 295 million pounds. The average profits for the four-year period is 76 million pounds.

Oral argument — Delaware River&Bay Authority v. Kopacz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Now, he was entitled to long-term disability payments for quite a period after that. … Koppaz, either by judgment or settlement in a suit under the Jones Act or other similar law.

Oral argument — Mabey Bridge&Shore v. Biehler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2011

And everything you look at in that statutory scheme, in the Buy America Act, including the material in the Federal Register, the comments about the statute, this regulation establishes that temporary bridges … There were 50 of them. 50 of them over a 20-year period. Well, so they say. But it was still a subcontractor situation on contracts that somebody else was entered into with PennDOT.

Oral argument — Artache v. Superintendent Forest SC I

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2023

The way I see that, your honor, is that that was not an inadvertent comment, um, in which the court by mistake made reference to his silence. Uh, that was an intentional comment. … I don't think it should not be considered, period. But I don't think it should be given precedence.

Oral argument — In Re Lipitor Antitrust Litigation

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2017

And finally, the district court should not have limited our damage period. … I just wanted to make a comment about what Mr.

Oral argument — Heather R.Oberdorf,etal. v. Amazon.Com,Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2018

Your comment that you said we're talking about a product, I guess, goes to the defective product claim. … They're selling it on they aren't sellers under the Pennsylvania Act?

Oral argument — Adorers of Blood of Christ v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2022

And so Adores was one of a small subset of landowners who got a special letter from FERC asking for comments. FERC got 100 comments. … First of all, I think under RFRA, because the government is broadly defined, Transco in the exercise of condemnation was acting as the government as RFRA defines it. For what period of time?

Oral argument — United States v. Marrero Jr

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2015

Yeah, but the court couldn't prevent him from taking the stand under the law prior to the Jinx Act material being disclosed, because that's not what the Jinx Act says. … So during the part of the conspiracy, the purpose of the 45 kilos to Atlanta comment was part of, in fact, the conspiracy itself.

Oral argument — Fresenius Kabi v. Par Sterile Products

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2020

There wasn't active infringement by the filing of an ANDA, which, you know, that's a fictitious act of infringement that gets everybody off and running to the District Court. … It's a comment made by Mr. Bradshaw, Ms. Manning, and the comment was that antitrust injury occurs only if traced to anti-competitive behavior by Parr. And he says there wasn't.

Oral argument — Doe v. Mercy Catholic

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2016

There's a much shorter time period. There's mediation. There are various remedies under Title VII for employees to file these kinds of claims. … And so in Title VI, in Title IX, in 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and in the Age Discrimination Employment Act, identical definition. But, Doe, we have a minimum ambiguity.

Oral argument — Nazario v. Commissioner Social Security

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2019

And these are things that the ALJ did not overlook and commented on specifically. Client has responded well to treatment. … They have periods of improvement and periods of deterioration. We heard mention to an isolated period in 2013 where there was some improvement in her condition.