Documents

Oral argument — LVRC Holdings LLC v. Brekka

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2009

Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. … Smith, essentially the owner of LVRC, makes clear that that computer was wiped clean. That's deposition testimony that I know that I cited in my brief. And at what point was it wiped clean?

Oral argument — United States v. Chao Fan Xu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2012

Is there undisputed evidence that there was clean money as well as stolen money in the Everjoint account? … Their expert, Rob Morris, made the comment that there was no basis, the government says there was no basis for the transactions. But Mr.

Oral argument — Kivalina v. Teck Cominco

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2005

That suit alleges 2,200 violations of Tecumeco's Clean Water Act. It's brought by the five individuals who seek to substitute in here. … The borough has comments that they would like to make. If you have no other questions I'll turn it over to the borough. Thank you. There is no appellant in this case.

Oral argument — Amanda Frlekin v. Apple Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2017

Does the comments of Stevens and Marillion and Inalcatrar apply only to community cases or not? The issue of bag inspection is one that comes up a lot. It does. I noticed. I noticed. … If they drove themselves, maybe they were on the air and subway, maybe they dropped their kids off at school.

Oral argument — Keenan v. Woodford

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2003

Pierce, that came in, related to a period of time very long after the period of the trial. … It cannot be reversed by this Court in the absence of clear air by the district court, and it's our position that there was no clear air, in fact that the abundant and overwhelming weight of the evidence

Oral argument — Northern Plains Res. Council v. STB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2011

So the five years encompasses both a construction period and a period of operation. … Well, there's no indication here that anything, the STB considered what would happen within the period of operation and the period of construction.

Oral argument — Northern Plains Res. Council v. STB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2011

So the five years encompasses both a construction period and a period of operation. … Well, there's no indication here that anything the STB considered what would happen within the period of operation and the period of construction.

Oral argument — Vacation Village, Inc. v. Clark County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2007

There was the determination of air hazard. We had asked for 76. We do have a denial by the FAA that said we couldn't build to 76 feet. … landowner sat on their rights both in state court and in the district court because initially Judge Jones dismissed their case in district court also then Judge Jones unfortunately took a significant period

Oral argument — Viacom International, Inc. v. MGA Entertainment, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2018

I made notes indicating that Viacom aired the program more than 1,700 times during the three-year period, but that's ten times more than what they were required to do under the contract. … And then on top of that, they didn't pay even within that period, the 15-month period in which, on their case, the airing occurred.

Oral argument — United States v. David Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2014

The district judge, Judge Phillips, actually commented on Ms. Lipscomb's testimony at trial. Let me read you the direct quote from ER 1904. … was officially rejected by the Air Force.

Oral argument — Tina Popa v. Nancy Berryhill

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2017

Um, and you know, sometimes we're actually fortunate that we can even get some comments in support of those assessment decisions. … I'm here to represent the Acting Commissioner of Social Security.

Oral argument — In Re: Charles Kinney

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2017

Well, the ADA law is an existing binding precedent, so is the Clean Water Act, so is stream protection as in the Toasty case. … water act, creating justice, wrong.

Oral argument — Plott Nursing Home v. Kathleen Sebelius

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2013

And if you look over on the far side also on the comments, it says area closed. And that's on 123? The date was 123? No, 128. 128. Right. And you can go through. … Judge, I want to respond directly to your comments and your questions about what the transcript actually said about that low-air loss mattress. Thank you.

Oral argument — Paiz Cruz v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2010

If you look at the asylum application, it indicates that the Petitioner was not living in the United States during the time period that she later states in her cancellation of removal. … However, in this case, I don't believe that the comments or that her direction of testimony was, rose the level of a due process violation.

Oral argument — Friends of the Wild Swan v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2003

EPA appeals from a judgment making EPA responsible for establishment under the Clean Water Act of total maximum daily loads for impaired water bodies in the state of Montana. … Supreme Court have said the purpose of this act is to clean up the nation's waters.

Oral argument — Center for Food Safety v. Thomas Vilsack

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2011

But at the moment, of course, that's all up in the air. The problem that we have here is that the stecklings, which were unlawfully planted in the first place, have vitiated the NEPA process. … And so really the only way in these types of cases to address that is to wipe the slate clean.

Oral argument — United States v. Khan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2008

But if we fly on Air Egypt when we're taking a trip abroad. … Thank you for your comment. Thank you for your argument in the matter.

Oral argument — Hemp Industries v. DEA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2003

Was that the Controlled Substances Act? No, the Controlled Substances Act was not passed until 1970. The 1937 Act was the Marijuana Tax Act. And that's where the definition of marijuana comes from. … Going through notice and comment, there were comments. The agency received many, many comments, and some were just along the lines of what you said. In fact, not even those nice words.

Oral argument — United States v. Deaon Bailes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2009

If a janitor comes to clean the facility and carries a pound of heroin in his pocket, can he say, well, I just came here to clean the thing? I didn't intend to commit a crime. … Period. Without ---- whether they intend to sell it or use it later or ---- The Court acknowledged that the purpose is to keep it from going into the grounds.

Oral argument — Cntr for Biological v. US Fish & Wildlife

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2008

It's a three-month period. … No reason to think they are going to be cleaned up. The whole reason for putting some area on a threatened or endangered list is so that there will be some attention paid to cleaning it up.