Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

1,162 results

0.28s

  • Oral argument — In re: LA Pub Svc Comm

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2022

    Are there any hard and fast dates or day periods? Well, there's the 180-day explanation period under 206 if they've delayed for more than 180 days in a final decision. … Well, I think ordering FERC to act in a certain time period in the return on equity proceeding would risk that FERC would not, at the end of the day, get it right, and it would be counterproductive because

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — LaShondra Davis v. Aetna Life Insurance Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2017

    First, it is undisputed that an abuse of discretion standard of review applies and that HEDNA was operating under an apparent conflict of interest because it was acting as both the insurer and the claims … Cheatham's comments to the peer-reviewed physician.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Benitez-Pinot v. Garland

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2022

    So what do do you have any comment on that? Well, it's okay if you don't. … That's correct, Your Honor, that he did not act...

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Matthaios Fafalios

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2015

    Instead, you have to look to the implementing regulations of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships. The Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships is the U.S. codification of our version of the treaty. … This sends a signal that something out there floating in the air may be a crime.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Self v. B P X Operating

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2022

    Similarly, the civil code and its articles say, its comments say, if you're not acting, if you are not acting to benefit the managed party and you're in fact acting in a way that benefits you uniquely, … Those courts are weighing prescriptive periods. Here's a conversion period of one year. Here's a 10-year period for your UMO.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Rosie Phillips v. Stephen Prator

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2020

    Phillips' claim for damages under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act was dismissed at the pleading stage when the district court determined that Ms. … It was essentially, like I said, a passing comment.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Collins v. Ingle

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2023

    The district court aired in denying plaintiffs 12 F motion, allowing a retired insurance adjuster to testify about red flags. … That's uh, I don't know if there was any other comment. There's no law that requires you to speak the entire 20 minutes if you don't wish to.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Garcia v. City of Amarillo

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2021

    And I would point out that this is particular this case shows particular problems when the agencies do not act. … So, this letter was a letter to the city attorney saying, you know, terrible things have happened to my client, and that related to the whistle in the air, the horn honk in his ear.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Williams

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2026

    They didn't come up with that language out of thin air. … Her final comments sort of are consequentialist ones, but still, you wouldn't think the commission would hide a revision that will suddenly disqualify what she counted as 26 states prior felons.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Daniel Stanford

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2017

    The comments that she made about him were before he was convicted, before the jury verdict. Okay, just in two sentences. … You can just put a period behind that one. Okay. Can I ask one question? Yeah, because I'm... Yeah, well, let me do this first.

    50 min of audio
  • Oral argument — eQHealth AdviseWell v. Homeland Ins

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2024

    It's not like an occurrence policy where the mere act during the policy period would trigger coverage. … Then there's a parenthetical comment.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Genesis Marine v. Darrow

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2025

    It's almost as if the court has gone from a de novo standard to a clear air standard or vice versa. It's that fundamental. The presumptions are different. The inferences are drawn in a different way. … But having asserted it on timing, we say now we look at the timing, period, end of story. That's kind of what we do in immigration cases. Why isn't that the arena here? It is.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Firefighters' Retirement Sys v. Citco Group

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2015

    It's just the kind of legal error that ThermTron makes clear this court has the legal authority to review when the court acts beyond its statute. … And so, assuming that you don't get, you know, box number one, that A, we have jurisdiction, and B, here's a nice, clean ruling, you can go back to New York.

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Selina Ramirez v. City of Arlington, Texas

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2020

    But that's not how they acted. And it's not what they said at the time, in response to investigators and in their written statements. … I mean, I would very much disagree that we're Monday morning quarterback, because the officers were because the way the officers acted, they acted as if they were a safe distance from Mr. Olivas.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Curtis Cluff

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2017

    The judge was sitting there when he made his comments that were cut off. He sat there during the arraignment that Judge Juneau referenced, et cetera. … And the determination by the district court that it was, is entitled to deference and if it's reviewed under clear air. I'd like to go back to record page 179, where Mr.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Quintanilla

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2024

    Federal program bribery requires the quid pro quo but does not have an official act, whereas honest services fraud requires bribery of a public official which requires an official act. … In their brief, they make several comments about how the judge, the judge's rulings or comments showed some sort of bias.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — LA Real Estate Appraisers Bd v. FTC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2019

    So it's for the pre-complaint period. … The hearing included an opportunity for members of the public to offer comments. One of the entities that offered the comments was the Real Estate Valuation Advisory Association.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Troy Taylor v. Marlin Gusman

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2020

    change at any point in louisiana law i understand that extended the statute of limitations and then the louisiana supreme court ruled on nicholson now is a reasonable if this were a some other official acting … mistake and black just kind of goes out the window how do you respond to that well i think there's different there's different kinds of mistakes like you know there's there's the mistake that happened i'm air

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Etheridge

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 9, 2023

    If we affirm on the sentence, wouldn't it be sort of a hollow act to remand for a judgment on the restitution? I think so. … Thorne details the deviant sexual acts and molestation on multiple occasions of his three-year-old sister when he was nine.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Karin Kristensen v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2020

    Each of these three incorrect legal rulings cause reversible air, which is reviewed under the de novo standard. The court should reverse and render. … Those are exceptions to the Federal Tort Claims Act. Once the court finds the Federal Tort Claims Act applies, then those are exceptions that would have to be proved.

    42 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.