Documents

Oral argument — Columbus Regional Hospital v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2021

Because here what they're seeking is irrespective of how they characterize their claim, what they're seeking is a declaratory judgment that FEMA aired in interpreting the act under 705. … They want $5 million, period. End of discussion. No more strings attached. That's correct. No more interaction. That's correct.

Oral argument — Litecubes v. Northern Light

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2007

The district court, in looking at the extraterritorial effect of the Copyright Act, held that it would lack subject matter jurisdiction over the Canadian publisher because there were no acts within the … I would also say that I think that, again, I can't imagine how we could have a rule of law that would be different for the Copyright Act than the Patent Act.

Oral argument — HALL v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2012

And it's very clear in the Remand Act portion of the Tucker Act that that's authorized. … Specifically, a witness is unlikely to be summoned for more than a few hours or even more than a few days, whereas this jury service was for an extended period of time.

Oral argument — +Carabetta Enterprises v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2007

It's watched the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, and the Marine Corps contracting. It doesn't like the way the Marine Corps' contracting operation works. … Well, I think the indication is the fact that it's all, of course, in one act, this Appropriations Act, and in the Appropriations Act, Congress simultaneously did several things.

Oral argument — Parkdale Intl v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2006

If it's passage by new rule, notice, and comment, that's right. … However, their comments sent to Commerce in April 2002 demonstrate differently.

Oral argument — Secretary of the Army v. StructSure Projects, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2025

So if the delay in the 13-month period was caused by the government as a contractor, then you get money for it. If it was caused by the government acting as a sovereign, you don't. … Let me clarify one of my comments earlier that I think got this off track. I'm not suggesting that the government breached the original contract. I'm saying that the government...

Oral argument — +Dippin' Dots v. Mosey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2006

In light of the comments of the board, his comments were completely accurate. It's what the board said. Now, I'm troubled by the Supreme Court opinion where he talks about what Mr. … But the judge still assessed legal fees under the Clayton Act.

Oral argument — Simons v. OPM

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2006

We made a Freedom of Information Act request for that. It was denied by the agency. We asked for a subpoena, and that was denied by the MSPB judge. … He was not separated during the early out period.

Oral argument — BillJCo, LLC v. Apple Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2025

The patents disclose improvements in mobile systems to perceive and act on location information. … Could you comment on periodic beaconing? Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Iancu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2020

What do you do about the fact that the board clearly aired when it said onychomycosis includes superficial mycosis? I think when you read the... It would have been better if the board was clearer. … arguing today the opposite of what the director is arguing, that is we're seeking to prove infringement of a claim that has onychomycosis, and we're seeking for it to cover just an infection of skin, those comments

Oral argument — Glycine & More, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2017

Is a timely request one that's made prior to the 90-day expiration period? Correct. And you're saying that if the request is made after the 90-day period, there's a different rule? Yes. … When the regulation says that secretaries should act in a way when it's reasonable to do so, it is expected that the secretary will act reasonably, which would be to consider all the evidence in front

Oral argument — SMITH & NEPHEW v. ARTHREX

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2012

The 12-6 number is picked out of the air by Arthrex. … You also have to have knowledge that the direct infringer's acts constitute infringement. It's a direct quote from the case. No doubt about that.

Oral argument — BIGGERS v. NAVY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2013

If the court were to look at the Back Pay Act, which is a statute Congress enacted, it does not make that distinction. The Back Pay Act, which is Section 5596, says nothing about the ground of it. … period.

Oral argument — First Niagara Ins v. First Niagara

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2006

two things In order to have trademark protection Or to oppose a trademark Advertising and the provision of services And the advertising has to be In connection with the provision of services Any final comments … commerce Or the instrumentalities of commerce Or is there an effect on commerce And our position is that We are involved in all three We are involved in the channels Because we are involved in roads And air

Oral argument — Trinkl v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2018

The peanut gallery comment appears to be an age discrimination based comment, so that comment also should be considered as waived before this court and should no longer be considered in a determination … Are you saying that the peanut gallery comment wasn't reviewed at all?

Oral argument — CCI, Inc. v. Army

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2015

Your Honor, I guess I do want to make one comment on that. … Your Honor, the soft comment, these projects are routinely done on soft soils. That's not unusual for this open soil design.

Oral argument — CRFD Research, Inc. v. DISH Network Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2017

But looking at the larger intent of the American Vence Act, I find this very strange. Yeah, well, it's true. … I'd like to begin with comments that were made by my friend concerning the idle period. This goes to the Bates reference. In fact, the board discussed this at length in their opinion.

Oral argument — Motorola v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 9, 2007

But it seems to me that there's no requirement of how many times customs has to act. It just has to be multiple times. … And then my final comment, I'll save the rest of my time after my final comment for rebuttal, is on the Chevron issue, which I think is looming out there.

Oral argument — V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. Trump

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 31, 2025

But just the National Emergency Act is different, right? Correct. … authority to the duty of tariff rate quotas, Section 301 of the Trade Act of 74, Section 731 of the Tariff Act of 1930, Section 107 of the Trade Act, Section 505 of the Trade Act of 74.

Oral argument — Technical Furniture v. CBT Supply

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2009

Their single and only conversation on any of this was that the patent attorney affirmed that this power of attorney did not act as an assignment. Remind me, did the patent attorney, testimony, right? … And there's a danger, it seems to me, lurking out there, and I want your comment on this if you would, that one person will go into the lawyer and say, You know what?