Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.08s
Oral argument — Great Basin Mine Watch v. Hankins
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2006
So that's the second Clean Water Act issue. The first one is the dewatering. … So we feel that that's a violation of the Clean Water Act. The other part of the Clean Water Act that is even more specific is the anti-degradation provisions.
42 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Cruz
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2014
There were intermittent comments by Mr. Cruz. … You know, you're arguing plain air, and we asked the defense counsel about plain air. Judge Cowan alluded to it. Does it really make any difference here?
40 min of audioOral argument — Rasmy v. Marriott Internationa
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2019
Water Act. … And what we're stuck with is a situation where we're going to see a continued—this is not just a Clean Water Action case. It's also a case under the Natural Gas Act.
80 min of audioOral argument — West Virginia Rivers Coalition, Inc. v. The Chemours Company FC, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2026
But if you just hear there's a, I mean, there's a Clean Water Act permit and you hear it's being violated, Clean Water Act permit is, you know, generally to protect against bad things in the water. … That is the normal way Clean Water Act violations are supposed to be addressed.
48 min of audioOral argument — Rasmy v. Marriott Internationa
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2019
Water Act. … And what we're stuck with is a situation where we're going to see a continued this is not just a Clean Water Action case, it's also a case under the Natural Gas Act.
80 min of audioOral argument — Home Blds Assoc NC v. USFWS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2010
And they're not just talking about the Endangered Species Act. They're talking about the Clean Water Act, any federal environmental statute. But I don't know why they have no logical stopping point. … I think it's implicit that if you're not even going to look at the listing cost, you wouldn't be looking at cost of California statutes, the Clean Water Act, et cetera.
29 min of audioOral argument — Kokesh v. Curlee
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2021
That was still up in the air? Yes, Your Honor, it was up in the air. … As I think we've discussed a little bit, that statute may or may not cover the— cleaning the message into there.
47 min of audioOral argument — City of Vandalia v. G & T Holdings, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2012
The context of the legislative history, which I've taken pains to discover and put out in my brief, starting with the Illinois Clean Indoor Air Act in 1990, and then moving forward to the Smoke-Free Illinois … It's consistently always been in either the Clean Indoor Air Act or in the Smoke-Free Illinois Act, which repealed the Illinois Clean Indoor Air Act.
31 min of audioOral argument — Crocker v. Austin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2024
The Air Force has never stated that they've agreed to any of those additional remedial actions. They've said that they would go back and clean up adverse records. I give them that. … And after a certain amount of period of time in the military, a service member is entitled to that.
39 min of audioOral argument — Conocophillips Alaska, Inc. v. Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2024
It has regulations that set specific time periods for the release of data, unlike in the NPRA where it's a regulation that simply says Freedom of Information Act will govern the release. … Unlike other laws, the Clean Water Act or the Clean Air Act or something where Congress might have to take into account lots of different regulatory schemes by different states, this is a one-off, and
34 min of audioOral argument — Arrowood Indemnity Company v. City of West Sacramento
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2022
The one court that has addressed this, the traveler's case, which you said in our papers, found that the act of firefighting, if the firefighters were using water to disperse pollutants, that that is expected … Did he assume any cleaning occurred? He did assume that some cleaning occurred, but he was generous with regard to the amount of dust particulates that were left in the room. Okay.
37 min of audioOral argument — People v. Travis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2013
if you're going to act like a man or act like a kid about this. … He made a comment, but he didn't wait around for an answer. It was not a comment that was intended to elicit an incriminating response. Remember the comment. I'm sorry? Remember the comment.
37 min of audioOral argument — BMW Financial Services, NA v. Auto Showcase, Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2017
You've got to go beyond the Secretary of State's office because we presume that the Secretary of State will act in accordance with the documentation submitted to it. … Can you address that last point hanging in the air? Yeah. So the language on a duplicate certificate title, you have to presume is purposeful.
34 min of audioOral argument — Valerie Hawkins v. Community Bank of Raymore
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2014
In fact, in Chevron, the Supreme Court said we are convinced, as the Court of Appeals is, that the Congress never intended for these bubble zones to be part of the initial Clean Air Act. … However, because Congress granted express authority to the regulators to pass regulations with the force of law, the regulation, in our view, furthers the purposes of the statute, the Clean Air Act, and
31 min of audioOral argument — Columbia Riverkeeper v. Andrew Wheeler
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 26, 2019
There, this court rejected a claim that a different portion of the Clean Water Act had a non-discretionary duty by EPA under the Clean Water Act that was a far stronger candidate for a mandatory duty than … It also involved whether there was a Clean Water Act mandatory duty.
31 min of audioOral argument — People v. Meakens
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2020
Because, for example, I mean, I don't know how clean of a car the defendant keeps. But, for example, ashes are something that dissipate and go away or can be cleaned out. … And like I said, someone who's thinking or acting with ordinary care would not act the way the defendant did.
56 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Arturo Astorga-Gonzalez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2013
Well, so how do I suggest on clear air review that the official was made aware by your client of all relevant historical facts? I don't clear air review. Right. … I was going to say, do you want to comment about the motion to strike? Yes.
23 min of audioOral argument — Retail Energy Advancement League v. Anthony Brown
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2025
It says you can't market your product as green energy, period, because it comes from State X, even if it satisfies the requirements of the green energy definition that the State itself imposes. … I believe the bill that went through the General Assembly at the turn of the century was some sort of free choice act that opened up the state's energy market.
44 min of audioOral argument — Taylor v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2021
of time there where we could have done that the I'm it's a short period of time mind you but there's a period of time where we could have done that and then this would have been we could have filed that … that's saying that not only were they aware of these these overflights they had dammit they were damaging the enjoyment of the property for the tailors that's the allegation and they complained to the Air
23 min of audioOral argument — Winnemucca Indian Colony v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2020
The Air Group had the tribe running self-sufficiently. No government grants were requested. … If you want to participate in the Paiute Judgment Fund, you must not be in this colony and acting as counsel.
31 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.