Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Waterman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2014

This is not something where the investigation was ongoing for a period of time. … Because otherwise we are in a situation where acts that occurred years beforehand are being called into question years later.

Oral argument — Fried v. JP Morgan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2017

But here I'm not just relying on those comments. I would rely on the statutory structure and the purpose. … Well, they have some responsibility with respect to the Homeowners Protection Act. They do.

Oral argument — Contrerasv.Atty General Of United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2011

For some period of time. Correct. … Let me ask a question here based upon a footnote in your brief, page 30, where you talk about this backlog that I had referred to your comment there. Right.

Oral argument — Michael Perrone v. Johnson&Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2022

But more likely than not, our class period, I would note, is significantly shorter than the class period in the securities case. How does Dudenhofer frame that claim, Mr. Bondaroff? … is not a grounds to find that a fiduciary acted imprudently.

Oral argument — Khan v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2020

, an admission to having committed the act, or an admission to having committed the essential elements of the act. … Would you comment on the plea, the guilty plea, whether the fact that he pled guilty and admitted the crime removes the need to even address the conviction?

Oral argument — Edgar v. Avaya Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2007

And the Court balanced those two competing interests by adopting a presumption of prudence whenever ESOP trustees act in accordance with the express ESOP purpose, which is to allow employees to acquire … Henson's comments about the fact that this plan is stricter than the plan in Munch. I was surprised to hear that because it simply isn't.

Oral argument — USAv.Van Pelt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2011

Are you asking for any, to save your comments? Yes, thank you. I would ask for three minutes of rebuttal, sir. Thank you. … He takes no affirmative action during that period of time. The action he takes is after he has resigned, he sets up a meeting with Mr. Mosca later on. It's either March or May.

Oral argument — Federal Trade Commission v. Shire Viropharma Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2018

There were comments posted on the public record, often at the request of the FDA. Why didn't the FTC act more quickly? Well, I've got a couple answers to that. … So there's that nine-month period.

Oral argument — Burnsv.Pa Deptof Corrections

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2009

We're into other generations of commentators now. … That's what the temporal period and events here may suggest, according to the theory that has been articulated by the petitioner.

Oral argument — Dr.NevilleM.MirzaV.InsuranceAdministratorofAmerica,Inc.,etal

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2015

A one-year period. Where do the circuits stand on that? Well, the circuits are split. … This is a relatively short period, isn't it? I mean, I understand that there's no requirement for a period, apparently, that a plan administrator has to give for a legal action.

Oral argument — B&GConstruction Co Incv.Director Of Workers Comp Dept Of Labor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 24, 2011

In Section 932C of the Act, in terms of which benefits are set forth, the next section provides, benefits should be payable during such period by each such operator under this section of the category as … Senator Bird's comments on the floor or was it in a report? Where did we find that? Two days later on the floor. Two days after what?

Oral argument — United States v. Goode

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2017

The state is asking, in effect, the federal court to act. And the federal court is saying that it's not going to act. They're certainly not making a demand. No one here is acting out of line. … That's what the comments in Smith v. Nash and Karchman as well. I take that back. Karchman in, Smith v. Huey, Karchman v. Nash dealt with the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act.

Oral argument — Jane Doe v. East Stroudburg Univ of PA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2026

I am limiting my comments to those counts that are contemplated in the District Court's Certificate of Appealability, etc. … But I would also suggest and submit to the court that it operationally acts as a status-based tolling rule. Why?

Oral argument — PPLCorp v. Comm Internal Revenue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2011

Companies Act profits, meet all three of those tests. Conceded by the commissioner that it meets all three tests? Indeed. That's what happened in the Entergy case. … The profits for the four-year period, the taxable period, 306 million pounds. The flotation value is 295 million pounds. The average profits for the four-year period is 76 million pounds.

Oral argument — Real v. Shannonetal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2010

Reallo was charged by criminal information with committing certain sexual acts against a minor victim in December of 1996. Based upon that, yes. Counsel, that isn't quite correct. … Your Honor, I really can't comment on that. I don't have that part of the transcript up in my mind right now. Okay.

Oral argument — AriWeitznerV.SanofiPasteur,Inc,etal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2015

And did you say it's a 90-day period? You got to file within 90 days? It's filed within 90 days. And they didn't do so. They have every opportunity to do so. … I just have a couple more comments.

Oral argument — Eshleman v. Patrick Industries

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2019

So, but commenting on what was stated about the issue of whether or not they fear that Mr. … The final rule set forth the congressional intent to expand the ADA through the ADA Amendment Act.

Oral argument — Flores v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2016

But the bottom line is that we are not held to deciding that because she did nothing that she has committed an act. It is no act. She did nothing. … Period. We are in a categorical approach. Time and time again. Discounts. No, a categorical approach. That's removed.

Oral argument — etal. v. In Re LTL Management LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2022

What is before you today is the bankruptcy court's conclusion that LTL acted in good faith. … Since you're batting, clean up. Thank you very much, Your Honors.

Oral argument — Ragan v. Hornetal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2010

What periods, you happen to know, and I was curious when I studied this case, what periods do courts usually allow when there's equitable diligence? … I think the error was in her three opinions, including the last one with the careless disregard comment of … Mr. Wiseman. Yes.