Documents

Oral argument — NLRB v. VCNCL, L.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2016

And they didn't give you notice, employer notice, and the comment was made that—objecting to that and concluding with saying that that's not protected. I don't believe that's a protected act. … Well, the employees are protected in many ways by the National Labor Relations Act. Unless there is a protection on the act, however, the employees do not have the protection of that act.

Oral argument — Sansone v. Jazz Casino Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2021

Horizon because they both involved sexually suggestive comments and no physical touching over a period of months. One case was five months. Another case, it was twice a week over three months. … Santone engaged, which is to say on December 22nd, 2017, she made a written statement of a customer acting inappropriately and making inappropriate comments to her and her termination some nine days later

Oral argument — Willie Meche v. Key Energy Services, L.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2014

What's critical in this situation, really relative to both the issues of maintenance and cure in the case as well as the training that goes towards the negligence issue in the case under the Jones Act, … He said, I keep a clean boat. I said, no oil or grease, no oil or grease. Well, lifting a 100-pound hatch that has a hinge is different from lifting 100 pounds of dead weight.

Oral argument — Spirit Aerosystems v. Paxton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2025

But what we saw was that literally the last person we know of who they said that to, Annunciation House, within the grace period, they did not after the grace period, within the grace period filed a lawsuit … They have literally not only said it on page 23 of their brief, they've acted on it.

Oral argument — HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Kenneth Crum

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2018

As to both periods, so it'll help me... Yes, absolutely. … Neither one of them cites 108C, period.

Oral argument — United States v. Mark Kuhrt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2015

Lopez's defense that he didn't act with criminal intent, that there was no criminal intent. It's uncontested that he recommended disclosure. … Well, if they can't identify it for restitution, how can the court just pick a number out of the air and use the $2 billion?

Oral argument — Hawkins v. HUD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2021

The owner failed to complete the corrective actions specified in the notices of default within the time period allowed in both notices. … The owner did not comply within the time period specified in the Notice of Default. HUD considered that the owner didn't comply.

Oral argument — Mi Familia Vota v. Ogg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2023

There was the Air Evac case that involved rate-setting issues, and the defendants in the case were shown to have some involvement in that rate-setting process. … There is no Fifth Circuit case, period, where this Court expressly says, yes, we have collateral order doctrine jurisdiction over a claim-specific immunity defense that will not remove a litigant from

Oral argument — Goodrich v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2021

So you better argue, don't act like I have any kind of latent insight about Youssef Rooks. When I left the Bar Exam, I'm like, I will never see Youssef Rooks again. … The government argues, hey, this treatise favorably comments on the judge's treatment here. What say you? The treatise is not uniform.

Oral argument — Karen D'Onofrio v. Vacation Publications, I

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2017

Air Starter Components was very similar, very on point. In that case, the claimant tried to gain the revenue from 100% of the defendant's sales. … There was one period of time that Mr. D'Onofrio was on a trip for his work.

Oral argument — Malik v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2023

So there's a period of time where Mr. Malik's alone in that room with the phone. … Certainly that would violate the Privacy Act.

Oral argument — Avi Adelman v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2019

Why was she acting that way? That was only one officer. The other officer had not been trained on the photography policy, just as Ms. Branch had not been trained on the photography policy. … The other officers at the scene, you can pick up comments saying they're wondering why she's approaching him. They don't view him as a threat. They don't view him as interfering.

Oral argument — State of Texas v. Charles Kleinert

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2016

So then are we reviewing the findings of fact for clear air only? Is that your position? … That's his authorization to act. Well, let's say the task force MOU said you will not be a member of this task force or acting under color of the task force if you use a gun, period.

Oral argument — United States v. Joseph Antonucci

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2016

They took two recesses during the day, and he commented before the first recess that the government had referred to an FBI 302 report that he didn't even have. … And while I think they probably should be kept in the running of a good company, this concept came out of thin air in the hours before sentencing in the late memorandum filed by the government.

Oral argument — Lindsley v. Omni Hotels

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2024

But this court made no comment one way or another about when those comparators were paid more or less, because timeliness was never raised. Let's talk about comments one way or the other. … The district court never even commented on it. Didn't rule on it whatsoever. That was error.

Oral argument — Cell Science Systems Corp. v. Louisiana Hlth Svc a

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2019

So you had a dispute from the GO Act that you didn't owe the claim, yet you didn't raise the anti-assignment clause. … If we were to rule on a clean slate, so forget our precedents, and we're just talking about Lexmark, I just want to ask you this hypothetical.

Oral argument — Candance Scott v. Amarillo Heart Group, L.L.P.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2014

During this sort of comment from this man for a considerable period of time, and I guess finally she'd had enough, and she reported it. … And he's the one that came up with the idea of the let's terminate her and let's say it's the probationary period that we're going to terminate her in.

Oral argument — Austin v. City of Pasadena

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2023

And in response, Jamelle thrusts his legs up in the air. Now, the lesson the trial court takes from that is the trial court says, well, this is where Jamelle begins kicking more violently. … We've seen situations where you have a policymaker who has – who fails to act, et cetera, and his failure to act then becomes that.

Oral argument — Daniel Cruz v. Maverick County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2019

It can be extended to a three-year period if the evidence shows that the county acted with reckless disregard. Okay? That's from the McLaughlin v. Richland shoe case. … So prior to the second DOL investigation, they offered no evidence in the record that they acted in good faith to try to act in compliance with their failure to pay.

Oral argument — Doe v. Planned Parenthood

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2025

But the courts said they were not disqualified for a period of time at least. … The whole point of the False Claims Act, on which the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act is based, is to ensure that those who seek money from the public fisc act with scrupulous regard for the requirements