Documents

Oral argument — LifeNet Health v. LifeCell Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2016

Some portions of the opinions, the judge is talking about the final act is transplantation. What's relevant is what happens at the time of transplantation. … Well, it doesn't seem to me that what you are proposing to say we need to clean this up, your proposal is plain meaning that no plasticizer is deliberately removed from the internal matrix of transplantation

Oral argument — Global Tubing LLC v. Tenaris Coiled Tubes LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2025

But the comment doesn't seem related to that at all. And, I mean, we all know how we edit documents sometimes and make comments. … And Judge Hughes, I understand that the comment bubble, you know, is, I understand your questions about the comment bubble.

Oral argument — Nutt v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2016

The government in this case is trying to distinguish Massey by saying, well, this is a Federal Tort Claims Act case. That was a Military Claims Act case and there's a difference. … The government's taken inconsistent positions over the periodic payments. They've asked for a revisionary trust. The Federal Tort Claims Act clearly allows for it.

Oral argument — Adams v. SSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2009

There would be no basis for saying his personal views of this employee during this period of time is relevant where the personnel records for the same period of time are not relevant, right? … The administrative judge spread out his comments on the mitigating factors throughout his opinion.

Oral argument — CORR v. METRO WASHINGTON AIRPORTS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2012

Now, to turn to today's calendar, the case this morning is number 2011-1501, CORE against Metropolitan Washington Air Force. Mr. King. Good morning, and may it please the court, your honors. … And finally, GAO conducts annual, or periodic, rather, financial audits. So a lot of that would be true of private contractors with the federal government.

Oral argument — NOVA v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2020

A couple comments on that. … And what the court's later decisions make clear and what VA has conceded is that, in fact, there is a limitations period here. It's the six-year limitations period in Section 2401A.

Oral argument — Apex Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2017

So once you've identified the customer, the time period, or the region that, under the pattern provision, and I don't remember, in the first case, it was a time period. … Granted, they thought the rule was repealed, but they had acted illegally in repealing it.

Oral argument — Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2025

And that's reflected in the agency's actions subsequent to recognize this court's decision to seek comment and to adopt a new methodology which we also support. And I would also comment on Mr. … What, if any, time limits are there on the CIT acting on the assumption we vacate the CIT, not the CIT, the Commerce acting on the assumption we vacate the CIT decision and order the CIT to remand it to

Oral argument — Jones v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2021

And the next day they cleaned and repainted his cell and didn't collect any evidence there. And the Tenth Circuit held there that no spoliation sanctions would have been appropriate. … He continued on for a brief period, looked up, saw another person who ended up being Mr. Murray about 200 yards from him. So the space between Officer Norton and Mr.

Oral argument — Intel/Microsoft v. Commonwealth Scienti

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2006

You made a satisfactory comment. We were satisfied, commercial but not based on. That's right, and that's the lower threshold. I'm not going to sit here and argue that that is a... … In other words, there is an allegation that a commercial tort has happened, and the DJ action seeks to clear the air over that commercial tort.

Oral argument — Essar Steel Limited v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2014

The Statement of Administrative Act, cited by both sides in this appeal, uses this type of information as an example for the need for corroboration. … That document sets forth nine separate subsidies that, on its face, appear to have been granted by the state government of Chattisgarh during this period. It was a viable policy during that period.

Oral argument — Eko Brands, LLC v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2019

That leaves echo again up in the air what's going on in addition to all the other harm of the ongoing remedial orders. … We took that act because of the outstanding order.

Oral argument — Altaire Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Paragon Bioteck, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2018

Before I begin, I want to take a moment to welcome some members of the Air Force Judge Advocate General's Corps. Major Jeff Lorick, who is here with them, used to be an intern for me, or extern. … So it's good to test it against a known weight periodically. They have the burden of proof. They're the ones. In their opening in Mr.

Oral argument — Albemarle Corporation v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2016

If the statute hasn't spoken directly to how the calculations should be made, then Commerce is given discretion to the extent that it's acting reasonably. … But not for the period in question. But it doesn't need to be for the period in question.

Oral argument — Reizenstein v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2009

In fact, the Board was trying to do the right thing by observing the degree of disability over particular periods and awarding compensation for those periods. … But as Judge Newman suggests, prospectively, it might change the way people behave in ways that acts to the detriment of veterans.

Oral argument — Gilda Industries v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2010

Section 307C1 of the Uruguay Ground Agreements Act directs that if the USTR has taken action during the preceding four-year period, then that action, quote, shall terminate, unquote, at the close of the … But is there also perhaps an implicit obligation on the industry for whom this statute and this retaliatory duty was imposed to act just to be certain within this 60-day period and to request extension

Oral argument — Apex Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2017

So once you've identified the customer, the time period, or the region that under the pattern provision, and I don't remember. In the first case, it was a time period. … Granted, they thought the rule was repealed, but they had acted illegally in repealing it.

Oral argument — YANGZHOU BESTPAK v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2013

And if the number was picked out of thin air, which it possibly may have been, you would have had a chance. I mean, where do they come from? Your Honor, we have several points, Your Honor. … Is that comment accurate? It is... That you put yourself into a precarious situation by only selecting two mandatory respondents?

Oral argument — Columbus Regional Hospital v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2021

Because here what they're seeking is irrespective of how they characterize their claim, what they're seeking is a declaratory judgment that FEMA aired in interpreting the act under 705. … They want $5 million, period. End of discussion. No more strings attached. That's correct. No more interaction. That's correct.

Oral argument — HALL v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2012

And it's very clear in the Remand Act portion of the Tucker Act that that's authorized. … Specifically, a witness is unlikely to be summoned for more than a few hours or even more than a few days, whereas this jury service was for an extended period of time.