Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
2,676 results
0.11s
Oral argument — People v. Carter
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2011
And so the issue is not as clean as it would be if there was no explanation, if it was just a statement contrary to a statement that had been made before without any explanation. … And finally, just one comment regarding the sentencing issue.
59 min of audioOral argument — People v. Peterson
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2015
Second, I want to turn to the Stacey's comments, also which were allowed in by the forfeiture by Warren doing doctor. … Not he cleaned up the scene. Not any of that. Drew killed Kathleen. Not even Drew said he killed Kathleen. It was totally inadmissible evidence.
43 min of audioOral argument — People v. Jackson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 26, 2014
And I think your job is to do a de novo review of that question, not a plein air review, a de novo review. … A long period of pre-incriminating response during the videotape where the detectives are providing misinformation to Mr. Jackson about everybody's told us that you've done it.
29 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2011
And Lucinda had said that Theresa, that there was no evidence that Theresa ever tried to clean her system. … The incidents of Teresa leaving her children in the care of family members before that, that's not the issue, because the purpose of the Juvenile Court Act is to correct the conditions which led to the
35 min of audioOral argument — Richardson v. Booker
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2022
It's kind of hard to say that throwing a table isn't an act of violence. Well, it's an act of ‑‑ it's a bad decision, but I don't think it's an act of violence. … Him throwing money in the air, not on her, but in the air, is not an act of violence. She started the act of violence by picking up a water bottle, throwing it at him, and striking him in his face.
33 min of audioOral argument — Village of Bolingbrook v. RE Land IL II, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2024
And second, reclamation activity, where you are actually filling in some of the holes that are created when you mine with clean fill. … The Surface Mining Act, the Pollution Control Board has exclusive jurisdiction over there.
40 min of audioOral argument — People v. Lopez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2010
Counsel mentioned that Judge Wagner had made some comment, whether it was offhand comment or part of his ruling, that this evidence wouldn't have been admissible anyway, and that was probably pursuant … Now, is it your position that the specific acts that are admitted to in the grand jury testimony, those specific acts would be admissible?
38 min of audioOral argument — In re Marriage of Anderson
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2010
If not, I'd like to comment about a few points from opposing counsel's presentation. … But what you're suggesting is that's all washed clean, everything that's sold can be income. I would agree with the Marriage and Dissolution Act.
42 min of audioOral argument — In re Committment of Spetnagel
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2014
I think an important part of this is my invited air argument. Answer the question first. Yes. So that's your point. Yes. … I think particularly important in this case, it was the invited air argument, and I think that's very important. It's also important.
44 min of audioOral argument — People v. Courtney
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 26, 2018
So her comments on the record support that her errors were not strategic and they were not reasonable. … I want to come clean. I had a drug problem. You know, this is my grandfather.
25 min of audioOral argument — Nafziger v. Board of Education of Staunton Community Unit School District No. 6
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2019
This did clean up an issue across the state, but it also was a monumental change. … Judge Deal, the trial court, deserves defense if this court has to comment on how many times she was evaluated, because that's a fact.
44 min of audioOral argument — People v. Downs
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2014
They suggest this is a possibly better answer, and the Supreme Court doesn't act on it. … And ultimately, I think his dissent in Franklin is about the trial judge should refrain from making such comments.
41 min of audioOral argument — The Highview Group, Ltd. v. William Ryan Homes, Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2019
You have to come with clean hands. Mr. Swerdow doesn't come with clean hands. He accused Mr. Ryan of stealing. That was his original, he had fraud case. … That was a period of about two weeks. And Mr. Swartow had been working on this project since 2010 for over four years. And Mr.
40 min of audioOral argument — Carnahan v. Stepping
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2023
The trial court where I think the trial court aired is they found that first off, he didn't the 20 year statutory period doesn't begin until he learns that he owns the disputed parcel of land, which of … I think the trial court aired on those two principles of law. First off, the appellate never gave permission.
34 min of audioOral argument — Schneider v. The City of Springfield, IL
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2010
They land by air. So they would land by air, and then he would move to his home, which is located adjacent to the lake, and park the vehicle there. … You realize we have to find this ordinance a wholly arbitrary act. Correct. And I think it does satisfy as wholly arbitrary. I don't know the distinction between arbitrary and wholly arbitrary.
46 min of audioOral argument — Hahn v. McElroy
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2023
And the representative from Advancing Clean who did the mold remediation testified that he believed people living in the home would have noticed the mold. … In this case, the trial court made some comments to me about the failure to settle on a weak case.
29 min of audioOral argument — People v. Bowman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2026
In this case, the case law, the statute itself, the instructions, and the committee comments all support the People's position. … The two IPIs that are clearly required are 727 and 728, and both of those require causation. 715, actually nothing in the committee comments.
27 min of audioOral argument — People v. Bragg
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2025
And in that, um, the Illinois Supreme Court said active participation in the direction of how the proceedings are going, um, is what invites the air. … But it was not random act of violence against members of the community at large.
29 min of audioOral argument — People v. Schag
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2019
now, he raises one issue, and that is whether his post-conviction petition established that the appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the issue that the circuit court violated to the Clean … Her denial of consent to sexual acts with others and her withdrawing her consent to sexual acts with defendants specifically.
27 min of audioOral argument — B.T. Trucking v. Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2011
You could also not have an employee handbook that doesn't voice requirements on you in terms of your appearance and to conduct yourself in a business-like manner and to be clean. … He actually worked solely for BT for a significant period of time, seven years, wasn't it? Yes, sir. Yes, sir.
24 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.