Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.18s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 23, 2026
In this case, the Final Rule lost sight of the Clean Air Act. … EPA has taken the Clean Air Act to a place where failure is the inevitable result.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
This Court’s interpretation of Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) in these cases could signifi- cantly affect most, if not all, of the 38 U.S. nuclear power plants that do not currently use … In addition to possible adverse effects on the land and air surrounding plants, retrofitting could adversely affect the very water resources protected by the Clean Water Act.
556 U.S. 208Amicus Curiae Brief — Relentless, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Department of Commerce, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 22, 2023
Indeed, that reliance is manifest in the history of judicial review of Clean Air Act regulations—and of the Act-specific review provision applicable in Chevron itself, Section 307(d)(9) of the Clean Air … Br. 3), but the APA did not apply to review of a 1981 Clean Air Act regulation, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(d)(1), and none of the APA language petitioners quote is found in the Clean Air Act review provision.
Amicus Curiae Brief — General Motors Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
The Clean Air Act Mandates Federal Enforcement of Existing SIP Provisions . 16 B. … The Clean Air Act Mandates EPA, supra, 698 F.2d at 463.
496 U.S. 530Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2026
That is not how Congress legislates—in the Clean Air Act or otherwise. … The Clean Air Act Does Not Preempt Respondents’ Claims, Which Target Entirely Different Conduct Than The Act.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026
The Clean Air Act accomplished no such sub rosa delegation of power. … Id. § 7411(a)(1). 14 EPA’s rules, moreover, operate prospectively, after public notice and comment, in accordance with detailed rulemaking requirements in the Clean Air Act. 42 U.S.C. § 7607(d).
Amicus Curiae Brief — American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Browner
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Air Act was enacted. … : Cost-Benefit Tests and the Clean Air Act, 11 Tul. Envtl. L.
530 U.S. 1202Amicus Curiae Brief — American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Browner
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Works, 93d Cong., A Legislative History of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970 (Comm. … Boyden Gray, The Clean Air Act Under Regulatory Reform, \\ Tul. Envtl. LJ. 235, 253-54 (1998).
530 U.S. 1202Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
a to. cannieonnebanbbadens 6 Statutes Administrative Procedure Act i Ty RR ERARES nn Rerne P ac a nar She 5 Clean Air Act Section 111 I ae 14-15, 20-22 Clean Air Act Section 112 My as OF WIEN … As an alternative, Congress provided Section 111 of the Clean Air Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Air Act. … Air Act.
549 U.S. 497Amicus Curiae Brief — Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 703 (2014) (No. 14-49)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Air Act, 14 Tul. … See Alice Kaswan, Climate Change, the Clean Air Act, and Industrial Pollution, 30 UCLA J. Envtl.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2020
It came as a surprise to many that NAHB needed to litigate a Clean Air Act (CAA) “prevention of significant deterioration” (PSD) rule since home building has never been considered a major stationary source … Circuit has also added an additional wrinkle to extreme deference by deeming it particularly important when reviewing “EPA’s administration of the complicated provisions of the Clean Air Act.” Id.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Dioxide under the Clean Air Act, 14 Tul. … See Alice Kaswan, Climate Change, the Clean Air Act, and Industrial Pollution, 30 UCLA J. Envtl.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
B FGER vices 14-15, 20-22 Clean Air Act Section 112 Ris Fee) | ere, 2, 5, 7, 12—15, 22 Clean Air Act Section 307 42 U.S.C. § 7607(d)(9)(A) iv 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments Section 108g) Pub. … As an alternative, Congress provided Section 111 of the Clean Air Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — General Motors Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
23 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. … Under the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2 $ 7401 et seg. (1982 & Supp.
496 U.S. 530Amicus Curiae Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
The Clean Air Act... contains a notice provision just like the one in the Clean Water Act. … absolutely no effect on EPCRA or any statute other than the Clean Air Act.
523 U.S. 83Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Congress chose not to follow this pattern, however, with the Clean Air Act. … Section 109 of the Clean Air Act Does Not Provide a General Rule Controlling EPA Discretion.
531 U.S. 457Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2024
Air Act. … Delay in resolving challenges to EPA’s actions in administering the Clean Air Act can harm all stakeholders, increasing transition and compliance costs for regulated parties, and extending periods of uncertainty
Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 25, 2022
The FPA Cannot Be Used to Shield States from EPA’s Regulation of Pollution Under the Clean Air Act Just as EPA’s regulation of greenhouse gases or any other air pollution under the Clean Air Act does … Massachusetts, 549 U.S. at 532 (discussing Clean Air Act § 202(a)(1)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — W.R. Grace & Co. v. United States (No. 07-1287)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
The Clean Air Act makes it unlawful to knowingly endanger another person through the release of listed hazardous air pollutants. See 42 U.S.C. 7413(c)(5)(A). … of the Clean “ir Act’s civil provision is “not within the reach of the Clean Air Act’s criminal provision.”
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.