Documents

Oral argument — Natural Resources Defense Coun v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2010

And we are here today to ask this court to enforce the right of these members under Section 107A of the Clean Air Act to an implementation plan that will attain the National Ambient Air Quality Standard … Air Act.

Oral argument — AIR v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2015

So I would hate to see a section like that just basically get written out of the act. As to authority, the Clean Air Act says the state presents an assurance of adequate authority. … To do that, we might as well not have the section in the Clean Air Act that says the state gives assurances.

Oral argument — Committee For A Better Arvin v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2014

So the two have always existed in the history of the Federal Clean Air Act. … But I think that the Clean Air Act and the Section 304 citizen suit provision really only gives citizens a limited, you know, limited enforcement options under the Clean Air Act, when there's a violation

Oral argument — Montana Sulphur & Chemical v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 31, 2011

And it's not, there's no de minimis rule in the Clean Air Act. It's not like, well, you can, you know, as long as it's not over X tons a year, go ahead, just do it. You don't have to account for it. … Is that something that undermines the Clean Air Act's goals, which are, let's keep in mind, I don't think you'll get this from reading their brief, is to assure that the enacts are attained.

Oral argument — Montana Sulphur v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 31, 2011

Oh, yeah, they do, and it's not, there's no de minimis rule in the Clean Air Act. It's not like, well, you can, you know, as long as it's not over X tons a year, go ahead, just do it. … Is that something that undermines the Clean Air Act's goals, which are, let's keep in mind, I don't think you'll get this from reading their brief. It's to assure that the NACs are attained.

Oral argument — Codoni v. Port of Seattle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2026

How does that fit in with the Clean Air Act? So that's also covered by the plain language of the Clean Air Act. Again, if we just go back to the statute. … I think we're back to the Clean Air Act. We're jumping around here, but we're back. I think we're back to the Clean Air Act.

Oral argument — Stegall v. Citadell Broadcasting

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2003

But who was on the air that someone to go on the air. Her co-hosts who had been working with her. Well, that's what I mean. … He sensed the Sunday morning show was more secure because they made the great comments comment.

Oral argument — Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2003

In addition, as we point out in our brief, every State has either a statute or a State implementation plan under the Clean Air Act that regulates agricultural burning. … But just don't forget that you have a very complicated, and as all of you know who live in California, a very strong Clean Air Act.

Oral argument — City of Oakland v. BP P.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2020

The second ruling, though, the Rule 12b-6 dismissal, said there is no federal common law of greenhouse gas emissions because it's been displaced by the Clean Air Act. Hi. … Even though the Clean Air Act has a savings-to-suitors clause, even though that statutory scheme contemplates that the states will be involved.

Oral argument — Stegall v. Citadell Broadcasting

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2003

Kroom, were then fired on December 15th of 1999, so all of this happened with respect to Marathon Media in a very short period of time. … He sensed the Sunday morning show was more secure because they made the great comments comment.

Oral argument — Robert Anderson v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2023

I had no relation to the Air Base. … So, you know, if the government's not acting, I think, I guess, if you could show that the government wasn't acting solely because of money, then it sounds like it would implicate some of these — just

Oral argument — Chantell Sackett v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2009

Air Act. … So there has to be a difference in the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act to justify the difference.

Oral argument — Michael Determan v. The Boeing Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2019

Oh, yeah, and make it self-cleaning. That's it. … I just wanna address some of the comments that the contractors council have made.

Oral argument — The Oregon Clinic, PC v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2023

So did your clients just shut the doors, period? … I'm not sure about methamphetamine, but the smoke cases, I mean, it's a cleaning. It's a significant cleaning, but ultimately it's a cleaning.

Oral argument — Center for Community Action v. BNSF Railway Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2014

already subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act. … The first reason was the Clean Air Act regulates them. That's why uncontained gases were excluded, is that's now within the realm of the Clean Air Act.

Oral argument — EPC of Hillsborough Cty. v. Volkswagen Grp. of America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2019

Air Act. … Air Act.

Oral argument — Latino Issues Forum v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2008

Rule 4550, however, does not do enough to fulfill the requirements of the Clean Air Act and EPA should not have approved it. … The statute, the Clean Air Act, gives a petitioner 60 days from the promulgation of a final rule to raise a challenge.

Oral argument — Sandra Bahr v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2016

exceedances that occurred over 25 days in a two-year period in order to demonstrate a clean and transparent system I started off with myself, I think, as a former environmental lawyer, and I'm going … Just that comment, as one of the solutions that's out there, to make adjustments that would alleviate, and it's a city, has contingency measures in place.

Oral argument — The National Association of Ho v. The San Joaquin Valley Unified

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2009

And finally, section 6.1.1 of rule 9510 can't be saved as an indirect source regulation pursuant to the Clean Air Act, because the Clean Air Act on its face says, quote, direct emission sources or facilities … So yes, you can get at, obviously an indirect source program gets at mobile source emissions, but they have to do it within the bounds of what the Clean Air Act allows, and the Clean Air Act does not allow

Oral argument — El Comite Para El v. Helliker

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2008

In the preamble to the CFR, EPA approved it as complying with provisions of the Clean Air Act, as it necessarily must. … Air Act.