Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

949 results

0.39s

  • Oral argument — United States v. Daniel Harris

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2020

    And in fact, the proof at trial was that some of the acts in this case relating to the criminal offense occurred in Virginia and elsewhere. … I think that is a very clean way to resolve the case. Can I? I'm sorry.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Southern Appalachian Mountain v. A & G Coal Corporation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014

    There is no indication that that pollutant, heat, was in the written application associated with Piney Run's Clean Water Act permit. It wasn't in the permit itself. … Wouldn't you be required, though, or would the district court be required under the Clean Water Act to have proof that the agency did know?

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Clinchfield Coal Company v. DOWCP

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2025

    And the interim presumption is critical to the whole Black, Alone Act proof scheme. … Additionally, in regards to those machine-printed comments, earlier in this decision, the ALJ reviewed something similar where the machine-printed comments noted it was a good effort.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Christopher Lancaster

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2021

    You don't have any clean ruling of the error that we're talking about in McCollum or whatever is retroactive. You have a clean ruling in Chambers that the statutory error there was retroactive. … I think that that certainly chambers chambers uses the language about the retroactive nature of the air a lot.

    54 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Upstate Forever v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017

    It says that this historic spill violates the Clean Water Act. … There may be a Clean Water Act violation.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Intertape Polymer Corp. v. NLRB

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2015

    Because it's out of the ordinary, they just can't do it, period. I think hopefully I'm understanding your question correctly. … There had been no activity between the March date and the April date for a considerable period of time.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ohio Valley Environmental v. Scott Pruitt

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2018

    It's defined in the Clean Water Act, so it's under federal law. Okay. So as defined in the Clean Water Act, West Virginia has been submitting TMDLs. Yes, that's exactly right. … Well, and the Clean Water Act lets them do that, right?

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Southern Appalachian Mountain v. Red River Coal Company, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2020

    The Clean Water Act is point source. … Would the Clean Water Act permit in that circumstance cover the pollution in state standards? Both SMACRA and the Clean Water Act. No, no. Under the Clean Water Act. Under the Clean Water Act.

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation v. NC Dept of Transportation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2016

    Hunter representing Clean Air Carolina and the Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation. There are an inordinate number of acronyms in this case. Yes, there are, Your Honor. … The numbers could be contained within the region, they could disappear in the thin air. They're not studied, they're not considered.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — North Carolina Coastal Fisheries Reform Group v. Capt. Gaston LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2022

    of the fairway under the Clean Water Act. … Under the Clean Water Act, they can catch as many bycatch as they want because that's not what the Clean Water Act is about.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Bristol University v. Accrediting Council

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2017

    What the Secretary of Education has done in its December 12, 2016 order is all universities have been given an 18-month period to seek a new accreditation from an entity that has been recognized by the … So I do think in looking at our supplemental brief, I would amend portions of it to say that I do think the question of jurisdiction is up in the air. You may not because you know that does not fly.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Timothy Wilson

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2013

    He acts, and I'm sure Your Honors have watched the videotape. It's in the joint appendix. He acts absolutely unruffled during this. Whereas Mr. Wilson looks like a poster child for ADHD. … And so, again, this wasn't a case where there was an isolated comment, an isolated reference to drugs.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Susan Turner v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2013

    Don't worry, the Coast Guard can clean it up. That'd be a different case, yeah. Good morning, Your Honor. … Surely not every search in which the Coast Guard engages results in a person being in the water, certainly in the water for long periods of time, and another person being dead.

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Darek Kitlinski v. DOJ

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020

    Let's say that Derek was not – it's just a matter of geography and convenience that Derek was located in Washington, D.C. during this time period. … Air Force. This is a case where Mr.

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — August Mack Environmental Inc. v. EPA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2020

    Did you all do work over the five-year period leading up to that? Your Honor, yes, there was work performed from 2012 to 2016. Trying to clean up that mess there, fair amount. Exactly, Your Honor. … Importantly, the approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act is not perpetual. Instead, the OMB director may not approve a collection of information for a period in excess of three years.

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Peter Waldburger v. CTS Corporation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2013

    Both are limitations periods that have the same effect of barring a plaintiff's claim before he has an opportunity to discover his harm. This Court is not riding on a clean slate in this case. … Furthermore, a longer limitations period gives defendants more incentive to clean up their contamination.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Richard Roe v. DOD

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2019

    And what was the time period of that science that it relied on? … And that's why it's a violation of that regulation, which is in turn a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act.

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Windsor Kessler, III

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2023

    And I think that that in and of itself bears on the question of whether indeed there were objections that preserved for an appellate review other than plain air, because... … And it seems to me that the probation officer acted somewhat aggressive right outside the courtroom and say, here, take it or leave it. Why not just clean the case up?

    55 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Davina Ricketts v. Wake County Public School System

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2024

    What's the deal with this three-day campaign period? … Or even comments about, this is not in this case, but even comments about her hair. And just in general, not the person here I'm talking about, general comments like that.

    56 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Izuchukwu Ozurumba v. Pamela Bondi

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2025

    Because there's a seems to be a period of time that was voluntary, that was small, and then there's a longer period that you allege is under duress. … So, take somebody that cleans. Paul, who cleans my office back in Columbia, he gets security clearance and is able to sort of come in and out of our chambers in a particular way.

    46 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.