Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
949 results
0.39s
Oral argument — United States v. Daniel Harris
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2020
And in fact, the proof at trial was that some of the acts in this case relating to the criminal offense occurred in Virginia and elsewhere. … I think that is a very clean way to resolve the case. Can I? I'm sorry.
44 min of audioOral argument — Southern Appalachian Mountain v. A & G Coal Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014
There is no indication that that pollutant, heat, was in the written application associated with Piney Run's Clean Water Act permit. It wasn't in the permit itself. … Wouldn't you be required, though, or would the district court be required under the Clean Water Act to have proof that the agency did know?
37 min of audioOral argument — Clinchfield Coal Company v. DOWCP
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2025
And the interim presumption is critical to the whole Black, Alone Act proof scheme. … Additionally, in regards to those machine-printed comments, earlier in this decision, the ALJ reviewed something similar where the machine-printed comments noted it was a good effort.
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Christopher Lancaster
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2021
You don't have any clean ruling of the error that we're talking about in McCollum or whatever is retroactive. You have a clean ruling in Chambers that the statutory error there was retroactive. … I think that that certainly chambers chambers uses the language about the retroactive nature of the air a lot.
54 min of audioOral argument — Upstate Forever v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017
It says that this historic spill violates the Clean Water Act. … There may be a Clean Water Act violation.
43 min of audioOral argument — Intertape Polymer Corp. v. NLRB
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2015
Because it's out of the ordinary, they just can't do it, period. I think hopefully I'm understanding your question correctly. … There had been no activity between the March date and the April date for a considerable period of time.
39 min of audioOral argument — Ohio Valley Environmental v. Scott Pruitt
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2018
It's defined in the Clean Water Act, so it's under federal law. Okay. So as defined in the Clean Water Act, West Virginia has been submitting TMDLs. Yes, that's exactly right. … Well, and the Clean Water Act lets them do that, right?
47 min of audioOral argument — Southern Appalachian Mountain v. Red River Coal Company, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2020
The Clean Water Act is point source. … Would the Clean Water Act permit in that circumstance cover the pollution in state standards? Both SMACRA and the Clean Water Act. No, no. Under the Clean Water Act. Under the Clean Water Act.
48 min of audioOral argument — Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation v. NC Dept of Transportation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2016
Hunter representing Clean Air Carolina and the Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation. There are an inordinate number of acronyms in this case. Yes, there are, Your Honor. … The numbers could be contained within the region, they could disappear in the thin air. They're not studied, they're not considered.
41 min of audioOral argument — North Carolina Coastal Fisheries Reform Group v. Capt. Gaston LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2022
of the fairway under the Clean Water Act. … Under the Clean Water Act, they can catch as many bycatch as they want because that's not what the Clean Water Act is about.
41 min of audioOral argument — Bristol University v. Accrediting Council
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2017
What the Secretary of Education has done in its December 12, 2016 order is all universities have been given an 18-month period to seek a new accreditation from an entity that has been recognized by the … So I do think in looking at our supplemental brief, I would amend portions of it to say that I do think the question of jurisdiction is up in the air. You may not because you know that does not fly.
39 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Timothy Wilson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2013
He acts, and I'm sure Your Honors have watched the videotape. It's in the joint appendix. He acts absolutely unruffled during this. Whereas Mr. Wilson looks like a poster child for ADHD. … And so, again, this wasn't a case where there was an isolated comment, an isolated reference to drugs.
43 min of audioOral argument — Susan Turner v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2013
Don't worry, the Coast Guard can clean it up. That'd be a different case, yeah. Good morning, Your Honor. … Surely not every search in which the Coast Guard engages results in a person being in the water, certainly in the water for long periods of time, and another person being dead.
46 min of audioOral argument — Darek Kitlinski v. DOJ
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020
Let's say that Derek was not – it's just a matter of geography and convenience that Derek was located in Washington, D.C. during this time period. … Air Force. This is a case where Mr.
45 min of audioOral argument — August Mack Environmental Inc. v. EPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2020
Did you all do work over the five-year period leading up to that? Your Honor, yes, there was work performed from 2012 to 2016. Trying to clean up that mess there, fair amount. Exactly, Your Honor. … Importantly, the approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act is not perpetual. Instead, the OMB director may not approve a collection of information for a period in excess of three years.
45 min of audioOral argument — Peter Waldburger v. CTS Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2013
Both are limitations periods that have the same effect of barring a plaintiff's claim before he has an opportunity to discover his harm. This Court is not riding on a clean slate in this case. … Furthermore, a longer limitations period gives defendants more incentive to clean up their contamination.
42 min of audioOral argument — Richard Roe v. DOD
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2019
And what was the time period of that science that it relied on? … And that's why it's a violation of that regulation, which is in turn a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act.
49 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Windsor Kessler, III
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2023
And I think that that in and of itself bears on the question of whether indeed there were objections that preserved for an appellate review other than plain air, because... … And it seems to me that the probation officer acted somewhat aggressive right outside the courtroom and say, here, take it or leave it. Why not just clean the case up?
55 min of audioOral argument — Davina Ricketts v. Wake County Public School System
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2024
What's the deal with this three-day campaign period? … Or even comments about, this is not in this case, but even comments about her hair. And just in general, not the person here I'm talking about, general comments like that.
56 min of audioOral argument — Izuchukwu Ozurumba v. Pamela Bondi
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2025
Because there's a seems to be a period of time that was voluntary, that was small, and then there's a longer period that you allege is under duress. … So, take somebody that cleans. Paul, who cleans my office back in Columbia, he gets security clearance and is able to sort of come in and out of our chambers in a particular way.
46 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.