Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.14s
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States Department of Energy v. Ohio
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Those cases addressed whether the Clean Air Act and CWA required federal facilities to comply with State-issued discharge permits. … See, e.g., the Atomic Energy Act, 42 U.S.C. $5841; Bank Holding Company Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1847; Bank Protection and Security Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1884; Clean Air Act, 41 U.S.C. § 7413 (d); CERCLA, 42 U.S.C
500 U.S. 951Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
in headwaters streams and thus potentially affected by restrictions on Clean Water Act jurisdiction). … If Adopted, Petitioners’ Arguments Threaten to Disrupt the Clean Water Act’s Coopera- tive Federalism Scheme and Unduly Burden the States. | The Clean Water Act, as originally drafted and subse- quently
546 U.S. 932Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 13, 2026
intent to incorporate a market-share allocation methodology drawn from Title VI of the Clean Air Act—a separate statutory provision that the AIM Act 5 The statute’s only substantive allocation instruction … other Clean Air Act provisions elsewhere in the same Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Bennett v. Spear
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1344; issuance of other permits under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387; and the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-76714; and, the provision of federal flood insurance … Reg. 58982, 58990 (1994) (goshawk historically has nested in 26 states and regularly visited 19 others). 6 (over 18,000 consultations conducted during the period FY 1987 to FY 1991).
520 U.S. 154Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
CAMPAIGN CLEAN WATER, INC. … The Act Manifests Clear Congressional Intent to Attain Clean Water. The Act is a comprehensive and far-reaching law designed to clean up the Nation’s waters.
420 U.S. 136Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Congress intended that citizen suits should supplement, not supplant, duplicate, or disrupt federal or state agency enforcement of the permits under the Clean Water Act. … Whether a citizen suit seeking civil penalties under Section 505 of the Clean Water Act is constitutionally moot under Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment, 118 S.
528 U.S. 167Amicus Curiae Brief — Virginia v. Maryland
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1288(f)................0.. 5 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1288(h) .................. 5 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1288(i)................... 5 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C … . § 131 McK 2MA)......... 5,6 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1313(d)(2)............... 5,6 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1313(d4)(B) ......... 6 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. $1313) ..........cc0e. : 6 Clean
540 U.S. 56Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Comments on 77 Fed. Reg. 30,473 (May 23, 2012), Docket ID No. … Since the inception of the Clean Water Act (““CWA” or “Act”), the U.S.
568 U.S. 1118Amicus Curiae Brief — NationsBank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Chevron considered the meaning of the term “‘station- ary sources” as used in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977. … Clean Air Amendments of 1970, Pub. L. 91-604, 84 Stat. 1676. 6 definitions “connote[s] an entre plant as opposed to its constitu- ent parts.” /d. at 860.
511 U.S. 1141Amicus Curiae Brief — PUD No. 1 of Jefferson Cty. v. Washington Dept. of Ecology
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Air Act. … EPA —conducts environmental reviews of FERC’s hydropower licenses pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of NEPA and Sec- tion 309 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
511 U.S. 700Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 19, 2023
An involuntary act is an unavoidable act—one about which no individual can make a deliberate choice. … presupposes that the accused has the capacity to make a decision to act or desist from acting.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
Air Act); id. § 6912(a)(1) (same, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act); 33 U.S.C. § 1361(a) (Clean Water Act); see generally James L. … gional Administrator approves New Mexico's State Implementa- tion Plan, pursuant to Federal Clean Air Act). 1© See, e.g., Notice of Regulatory Waiver Requests Granted for the Second Quarter of Calendar
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2026
The Clean Air Act Does Not Preempt Respondents’ Causes of Action...................... 13 ii II. … Petitioners broadly resist any application of state law to their activities, first asserting that the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Kentucky, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 15, 2026
Whether the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) may revise a National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) without the “thorough review” required by section 109(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act simply because … INTRODUCTION & SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT Under the Clean Air Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets a national limit on fineparticle air pollution.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Act, Section 306.....................ccccessssesesees 21 Clean Water Act, Section 316(a) ...........0.0.. 0... cc ccc ee eee eee 5 Clean Water Act, Section 316(b) ..........0..0..0....... passim Clean … Energy Commission, Comments on SWRCB Scoping Document and Proposed State- wide Policy on Clean Water Act State Water Resources Control Board at 7 (Sept. 26, 2006).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 4, 2021
Products Are Coming Clean, 49 U. … Coming Clean, 49 U.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. City of New York
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
The Act Manifests Clear Congressional Intent to Attain Clean Water. The Act is a comprehensive ‘and far-reaching law designed to clean up the Nation’s waters. … Oct. 17, 1972). 29 Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Air and Water Pol- lution, which reported out the Senate version of the Act.
420 U.S. 35Amicus Curiae Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
It used the English language in a functional sense.* In this regard, the citizen suit provision in EPCRA is different from those in the Clean Water Act and the amended Clean Air Act. … There is no reasonable justification for treating violations of the Clean Air Act differently.” id. at 11918. 12 —e _— "= it drafted the [CWA).
523 U.S. 83Amicus Curiae Brief — Magnesium Elektron, Inc. v. Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
Seldin, 422 U.S. 490 (1975)............. 5,18 Constitutional Provisions United States Constitution, Article III, §2, Rr a eee ROR ee aah Co maen passim Statutes Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. $7604 .... … ' See, e.g., Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7604 (Supp. 1991); Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1365 (1988); Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. $9659 (1988); Endangered
508 U.S. 946Amicus Curiae Brief — Southwest Airlines Co., Petitioner v. Latrice Saxon
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 2, 2022
The 1936 amendments added a subchapter II to the Railway Labor Act covering “Carriers by Air.” … App. 24a-25a (cleaned up).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.