Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
1,016 results
0.19s
Oral argument — In Re Walmart Inc Securities Litigation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2025
And the accounting judgments require not just a question of whether there was an alleged violation of the MOA or the Controlled Substances Act. … I think the comments and questions about loss causation were exactly on point.
42 min of audioOral argument — Makkyvs Chertoff
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
For what period? For what? For what? For pay? For a limited period? To prove, most likely, for the limited period between the suspension without pay The dates. The dates between when Dr. … I have a comment.
41 min of audioOral argument — Espinosa-Cortez v. Atty Gen USA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2010
I also wanted to point out one other thing. to go ahead and extend Ximena's period of voluntary departure. … In fact, this court held in the Arias case, this court found that the act of refusal to pay a war tax and even the inability to pay a war tax is an act of political opposition.
28 min of audioOral argument — NLRBv.New Vista Nursing
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2013
When the Senate entered its order for the period from January 3rd to January 23rd, the order said no business to be conducted. And indeed, on that same day, they referred to this period as recess. … I would just like to raise a few comments to some of the points made by my colleagues.
62 min of audioOral argument — Neville Chemical Co v. Tig Insurance Co
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2022
And I apologize if my comments made you think that. … date, but the occurrence must happen within the policy period.
51 min of audioOral argument — In Re Merck&Co
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 15, 2009
If they had acted, they would have feared, or they couldn't act because they feared being sued. Yes, correct. … I'm not sure how to evaluate that comment by the FDA in light of the drumroll of reports that seem to suggest that Vioxx clearly pose a cardiovascular risk.
38 min of audioOral argument — Helen Mining Co v. Elliot Sr
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2016
Not interpretation of the statute, but independent rulemaking by notice and comment. … At one point in your briefing, you note that the Department acted after notice and comment rulemaking, and you seem to embrace the idea that this was rulemaking and we're entitled to do that.
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Brow
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2022
Your client received the sentence here, received a separate sentence somewhere else, the Fair Sentencing Act and the First Step Act affect the first, there's nothing in those statutes that affects the … One, I think the comments about the violent crime, that was made in the context of general deterrence, and the importance of the district court is entitled to weigh the 3553a factors.
41 min of audioOral argument — Burtonv.Teleflex Incorporated
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2012
And her attorney acted on her behalf. There was some period of delay, was there not? No, none. Zippo. … We maintain that the Teleflex Act didn't take any act to terminate without cause.
31 min of audioOral argument — In Re RBS Citizens NA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 19, 2018
during this period. … There was – I believe in 2013 it was around 350, and it has increased around 500 by the end of the class period. And the class period is continuing.
36 min of audioOral argument — Williams v. Atty Gen US A
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2026
The comment period closed in late October. We then had a government shutdown that took up some time that we read about. And now we are in the process of continuing with that rulemaking. … During that period, there was indeed a constitutional problem. And the solution to that constitutional problem during that period was prospective civil suits like in range.
52 min of audioOral argument — Graden v. Conexant Systems Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
There's limitation periods on everything. If I hurt my leg, yes, I'm hurt. I may have tripped on someone's lawn, but I'll always be injured. So compensation defines who is a participant? … The question was whether the purpose of the act was to counteract fiduciary fraud.
71 min of audioOral argument — In re WL Homes
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 26, 2013
During this period, was there any money taken out or deposited in that account? Out of that account, no. … Great comments. Thank you very much, Mr. Corey.
34 min of audioOral argument — Petroleos v. MTKing
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
It is undisputed that the one-year suit period provided by the Carriage Goods by Sea Act applied to Pemex's cause of action in rem against the vessel. … I have a comment to Judge Ciuentes.
41 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2010
Gerasi, filed a PCRA petition where he said there's bats in the air. Then there was a notice of intent to dismiss by Judge Sabo. … He argued that the offenses, the prior convictions, were not as serious as they purported to be on the record and that the defendant was a man of youth at the time those acts were committed.
54 min of audioOral argument — Khan v. Atty Gen USA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2020
, an admission to having committed the act, or an admission to having committed the essential elements of the act. … Would you comment on the plea, the guilty plea, whether the fact that he pled guilty and admitted the crime removes the need to even address the conviction?
48 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Waterman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2014
This is not something where the investigation was ongoing for a period of time. … Because otherwise we are in a situation where acts that occurred years beforehand are being called into question years later.
17 min of audioOral argument — Fried v. JP Morgan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2017
But here I'm not just relying on those comments. I would rely on the statutory structure and the purpose. … Well, they have some responsibility with respect to the Homeowners Protection Act. They do.
35 min of audioOral argument — Charles Mack v. John Yost
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2022
This conduct, though, can you separate out the comments? I mean, there's some pretty reprehensible comments made. There was a sticker slapped on your client's back. Those, separate those out. … We know this was an extended period of time. We know what the foolishness was and the defendants haven't contended with it.
58 min of audioOral argument — Prusky v. Reliastar Life Insurance Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
entire three-year period? … That's exactly what they did during the breach period.
65 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.