Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
5,768 results
0.19s
Oral argument — Columbus Allen, Jr. v. Adam Christianson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2012
So if there still is, if they agree upon the treatment but the equipment's not available, I don't think that's the fault of the doctor acting with deliberate indifference. … A dismissal where there was no opportunity to discover facts or to submit anything other than just a dismissal period.
25 min of audioOral argument — William Tedards, Jr. v. Doug Ducey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2019
Let me ask you, I think we were writing on a clean slate. … We previously talked about the fact that the state does have one Senator acting unlike what would happen in the House.
42 min of audioOral argument — Wild Fish Conservancy v. Kenneth Salazar
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2013
The Washington Department of Ecology reviewed hatchery operations under a provision of the Clean Water Act, Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. … And here, the agency does it through its biological opinions for the ESA and under the Clean Water Act.
43 min of audioOral argument — CA State Legislative Board v. FRA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2004
Well, they do it for long periods of time, the railroad, so they'll have a permanent space for the railroad employees. It's not a day-by-day type lease. … They say, all right, Motel X, set aside 20 rooms for us until our lease runs out, whatever that period is. And it's usually for a year or longer even.
39 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Andrew Katakis
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2015
If there's no evidence that he said he was cleaning it out, that he bought something that would clean it out, and then it wasn't there. … No, I don't think that they've proved any act because the item that he bought wasn't responsible for the concealment or destruction.
41 min of audioOral argument — Stephen Schmid v. Sonoma Clean Power
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2017
He made a judgment not to opt-out, but does he have to go through the act of opting-out? Does he have to sit down and go ahead and take the action to put a stamp on the envelope? … It appears to be to the whole Sonoma Clean Power Program. Well, that's true.
20 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Webster
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 27, 2011
Yes, there were violent acts. … And principally with regard to the two underage individuals that he trafficked for the greatest period of time. And that was HB and ML.
37 min of audioOral argument — Ana Flores v. Rod Danielson
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2012
The whole exclusively linked rationale is premised or founded on how the three-year period acted pre-BFSEPA, before the new legislation came in. It acted exclusively as a multiplier. … Because we wanted to keep the case clean.
46 min of audioOral argument — Re: Stefler, Cenex Harvest v. US Bank
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2005
When it concluded on the Holder and New Course argument, remember there, the court said, no, you're not an HGC because you didn't act in good faith. … Come in with clean hands? Where's the bank's clean hands in this case?
39 min of audioOral argument — Ingram v. Barnhart
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2003
Even though she went to a clean and sober house several times, she became the house president. She was really trying. And I actually refused to take this case originally. … The significance of that comment in context of his analysis is that she has been able to function without alcohol.
23 min of audioOral argument — Sea Hawk Seafoods v. Gutierrez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2008
So, again, the Magnuson Act is, in addition to providing that short period of review, Your Honor, the Magnuson Act affords a very extensive process for public involvement. … Well, I think that, Your Honor, that would be correct because the Magnuson Act limitation period applies to regulations promulgated under the Act. But this is a challenge to regulations.
27 min of audioOral argument — Williams v. County of Los Angeles
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2026
I'm looking at Bradford and one of the comments, it says after the discussion that you referenced in this case, it says, we recognize, however, that the result may be different under other factual circumstances … And the reason is because that the later conviction is separate and clean compared to the first one. And so when you're challenging that first conviction...
40 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2003
He alleged that he was gasping for air and almost died. But yet his roommate didn't feel it was worthy of comment. It wasn't worthy of summoning prison officials to help assist him in this case. … So there's a span of two weeks that the air went out and he did suffer the severe attack.
22 min of audioOral argument — Susheela Narayanan v. British Airways
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2013
It calls it a limitation period. There is one court, Dixon v. American Airlines, where the court actually describes the limitation period as the repose period. … of two years, period.
42 min of audioOral argument — United States v. McDaniel
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2025
So I'm just pointing out there's a very long period of time before they know that they're being charged with a crime, any crime. … Nobody making that letter up would add those comments.
43 min of audioOral argument — Volcan Group, Inc. v. Omnipoint Communications, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2013
It is a criminal case, but the same Privacy Act statute applies. … Moran was saying something in his comments a moment ago about that, but I read the entire record over the last few days, and I do not recall seeing that.
36 min of audioOral argument — Chavez v. King
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2025
How could you have people just standing by to do industrial cleaning for one and one and a half hours? … I'm here to represent the acting commissioner of Social Security. Currently, Mr. Leland Dudek. Michelle King was the acting commissioner at the caption. Mr.
18 min of audioOral argument — Lata v. Ashcroft
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2004
She had to show that her marriage was, one, in good faith, and, two, during that time period, she was subject to abuse. … McVeigh came clean, so to speak, and said the marriage was indeed a ruse.
17 min of audioOral argument — Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Ryan Zinke
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2018
And this meaning is confirmed in other places in the Act. … So while the 2014 finding says that rising air temperatures won't have as significant an impact on grayling as other climate change effects, the science they cite says rising air temperatures alone are
49 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Lazarenko
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2008
And there is well more than $5,000 of that tainted funds with insufficient clean funds at every step. Okay, so you have to prove that there's not enough clean funds in the lip handle account. … This was a three-month trial, and the closings went on for an extended period of time. They object to a couple of statements by the government counsel.
58 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.