Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Marco Cherry, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2013

, speedy trial act violations. … And the 5th Circuit said in that case, the four-day period between February 2nd and 5th, which is the exact same set of facts we have except for a different date, was time consumed in placing the district

Oral argument — Clayland Farm Enterprises, LLC v. Talbot County, Maryland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2016

Under the 2012, Maryland's 2012 Sustainable Growth and Agriculture Preservation Act, counties were encouraged to adopt what the act called growth tiers. … Under this specific act, the act does not put the department in that position, doesn't invest that authority upon the department. The department only has the ability to comment if it so chooses.

Oral argument — Emmanuel Shaw v. T. Foreman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2022

And in fact, it's after August 4th that there's no hearings rescheduled, the 15-day time period within which to indefinitely prolong. … The dispute here is not over which of two causes was the reason for the allegedly retaliatory acts.

Oral argument — Humphreys & Partners Architect v. Lessard Design, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2015

And to make a building, to build a building from an infringing design is an act of infringement. But it's hard to see it as direct. … One of them is that when you step out of an elevator, you don't fall into open air. There's something there. It's in two of the elements.

Oral argument — Deborah Hickerson v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

So a part of comment J, which is indirectly referenced by the South Carolina Defective Product Act, which is also known as the 402A Act, because what it does is it adopts the plaintiff-friendly principles … You have to be content, period.

Oral argument — United States v. Darlene Altvater

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2014

Yes, 2009 and 2010, the same form, which covers two different periods. The periods are, what are the two periods? What's the period for count one and what's the period for count two? … You said that's what the restitution act says.

Oral argument — B. Shenoy v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2013

But, Your Honor, with respect, with respect, what he was commenting on is the need for somebody didn't supervise him. He was giving comment about something he doesn't get paid to do. … One, there is lack, and I've got to address the Fear of False Claims Act. That's the only remaining claim against CPG.

Oral argument — Mission Integrated Technologies, LLC v. Joshua Clemente

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2025

It has a substantial difference, both in the limitations period and in the preemption under the Delaware Uniform Trade Secrets Act. The preemption, I get that. … And this is the only, this is one comment and one conversation. That's the whole basis for their tolling argument.

Oral argument — Adib Makdessi v. Lt. Fields

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2014

I believe they've conceded that defendants acted appropriately, and certainly the magistrate judge found that they acted more than appropriately in light of the risk as it became known to them. … I'm not going to comment on that. He probably would like it under these circumstances. I won't comment on that either.

Oral argument — Kathleen Higgins v. Forest Laboratories, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2015

Second, that the danger period was the early period when the patients first started or when their dose was changed. … And we've briefed extensively on Featherall and 388 and those circumstances under comment and when an intermediary can even be used. Of course, that's incompatible.

Oral argument — Natl Assn of Immigration Judges v. David Neal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2024

But I would also point to the Supreme Court's most recent guidance in acts on enterprise, which clarifies what meaningful judicial review entails. … Well, I mean, I think what acts on us, and this is the language the court uses, is whether it's the kind of harm that can be undone.

Oral argument — United States v. Jesmene Lockhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2019

You just want to clean up Mossenburg. Exactly. So, I think we get relief either way. … Because before we ever get to his burden, the defendant's burden up here now, the government has the burden and the obligation to get things right when you're sending people to jail for substantial periods

Oral argument — Jason Thomas v. City of Annapolis, Maryland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2020

Well, Your Honor, again, you know, we're there isn't any there were there were no comments that were made. … Berger, can I, I'm sorry, can I follow up with your earlier comments about what constitutes an adverse employment action and what doesn't?

Oral argument — Walter Nielsen v. Chuck Hagel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2016

Why couldn't the Administrative Processes Act, Section 706, Paragraph 1, provide a basis for an action such as the one taken by the district court? … It may or may not, but it doesn't matter because the regulation says that the time period runs from the filing, the receipt of the notice.

Oral argument — United States v. Adonis Perry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2023

And they don't shoot up in the air and wing people. When you fire your firearm, it's for deadly force, right? And when you draw it, you're doing it in terms of... … Indeed, she used it for her own general, personal, and exclusive use for a period of months before voluntarily ceasing to do so.

Oral argument — Atlantic Coast Pipeline LLC v. 27.85 acres in Bath County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2018

Not as a matter of something ancillary to the Natural Gas Act, as a matter of their own certificate. They do not know which trees to cut. … So, but what that letter- Is that your point, that the rights-of-way and the construction and permanent rights-of-way and the number of trees to be cut are up in the air?

Oral argument — United States v. Jenerette Dixon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2013

Speedy Trial Act. This is after the fact. Speedy Trial Act violation. … I asked you that because I didn't want to make this comment without knowing when you were appointed. But looking at this record, one could construe that Mr.

Oral argument — John Doe 1 v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2025

There is no appeal, period. Correct, Your Honor. It's not the only right they have, though. They have the right to appeal, which, you're right, it's unusual. … And then acts like it's not a reduction in force.

Oral argument — Colony Insurance Company v. Charles Peterson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2014

I do think you're entitled to some period of time to read the report. She said if she knew what was in it, she had acted on it right away. If she had known what, but she didn't know what was in it. … She would have acted on it. So, and I think that's correct. And what we want this court to rule is that she's entitled, that the colony is entitled to, and she's entitled to a certain period of time.

Oral argument — Robin Walker v. Mod-U-Kraf Homes, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2014

And again, this is a case where the employee was harassed over and over for an extended period of time. And the company did absolutely nothing. … Is the EEOC acting as rebuttal on this, or are you joining? Okay, we've got it wrong there, then. You want your time now. Okay.