Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
2,676 results
0.30s
Oral argument — People v. Tapley
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2020
Can you tell me the relevance of the statement RL had been online making suicidal comments? What's the relevance of that? … You would not have showed up at her door had not been making suicidal comments.
45 min of audioOral argument — Presberry v. McMasters
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2021
The reason this case survives, and the reason the court aired, essentially comes down to the discovery. It's built into the era of the statute that is applicable to this case, the 1994 statute. … So those are my comments on the venue issue. As I say, I don't see this at all as a matter of first impression.
35 min of audioOral argument — Kieckhaefer v. Roscoe Township
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2020
That brief of a period would require that it have brake lights and turn signals. It's not a motor vehicle that you would be driving in the road, typically. … Um, there was a comment to demonstrative evidence in a heading that is not, that is not sufficiently preserve any air. It doesn't even identify. What's demonstrative evidence issue. Um, they didn't.
67 min of audioOral argument — People v. Davis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 17, 2016
is Johnny Taylor says the man who was shooting at me was clean-shaven Then he identifies Dennis Davis's picture and that picture was the picture taken when he was arrested for not having a valid license … actually act Appropriately and effectively will give Dennis good representation and not allow statements like Colton Greene's to come in where he testifies that Dennis has been in and out of jail for
41 min of audioOral argument — People v. Green Hosey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2019
They were mandatorily consecutive, and each one had a minimum 25-year ad act. … Arguably, the judge's comments regarding rehabilitation is superfluous. Why? Because the judge did what he was supposed to do. The judge made comments on the seriousness of the offenses.
35 min of audioOral argument — Schneider v. The City of Springfield, IL
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2010
They land by air. So they would land by air, and then he would move to his home, which is located adjacent to the lake, and park the vehicle there. … You realize we have to find this ordinance a wholly arbitrary act. Correct. And I think it does satisfy as wholly arbitrary. I don't know the distinction between arbitrary and wholly arbitrary.
46 min of audioOral argument — Heidelberg v. People
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 28, 2017
The State's Attorney reviewed the matter and declined to act further upon it. … But to be fair and respectfully, there's a distinction when we're talking about two governmental agencies acting under court order who act in contempt of that order, and public documents show, reveal that
39 min of audioOral argument — Pingleton v. Albers
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2012
I made a comment to Counsel Hendricks as we were during the break here as we're standing underneath Mr. … The evidence doesn't show an act of conflict over that road from 1876 to 2002.
41 min of audioOral argument — People v. Ross
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2018
Wouldn't the existence of guns or his ownership of guns be relevant generally to his interaction with this person and the prior bad acts that were identified? … Him going and getting all the supplies, these supplies like duct tape, air fresheners, caulk, trim.
36 min of audioOral argument — People v. Lopez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2010
Counsel mentioned that Judge Wagner had made some comment, whether it was offhand comment or part of his ruling, that this evidence wouldn't have been admissible anyway, and that was probably pursuant … Now, is it your position that the specific acts that are admitted to in the grand jury testimony, those specific acts would be admissible?
38 min of audioOral argument — People v. Pledge
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2015
And this Court stated that although it did not condone the reference to the comparison to the civil standard, it could not say that the trial court's comments did constitute error in this case. … If you put your hands up in the air and you say this is it, does that define a reasonable doubt?
57 min of audioOral argument — Vista Securities Inc. v. DeKalb County Collector
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 18, 2016
The county, under a trusteeship, is acting as trustee for the benefit of all these other taxing bodies within the county. … But DeKalb County as trustee for the taxing bodies has to act on behalf and in the best interest of all the taxing bodies that are included.
41 min of audioOral argument — Chicago Board of Education v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2022
One, you could set aside the order that you have and send it back for the commission to clean this up. … The law, the act, the Workers' Comp Act, specifically says that there needs to be a link between arising out of the employment and the injury, not the employment and the accident.
19 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2011
And Lucinda had said that Theresa, that there was no evidence that Theresa ever tried to clean her system. … The incidents of Teresa leaving her children in the care of family members before that, that's not the issue, because the purpose of the Juvenile Court Act is to correct the conditions which led to the
35 min of audioOral argument — People v. Peterson
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2015
Second, I want to turn to the Stacey's comments, also which were allowed in by the forfeiture by Warren doing doctor. … Not he cleaned up the scene. Not any of that. Drew killed Kathleen. Not even Drew said he killed Kathleen. It was totally inadmissible evidence.
43 min of audioOral argument — People v. Jackson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 26, 2014
And I think your job is to do a de novo review of that question, not a plein air review, a de novo review. … A long period of pre-incriminating response during the videotape where the detectives are providing misinformation to Mr. Jackson about everybody's told us that you've done it.
29 min of audioOral argument — Cushing v. Motorcoach Industries, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2013
When these remarks were made, what period was this? … is that for a period of time that the child resided with her.
80 min of audioOral argument — People v. Moody
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2015
You had a gentleman swinging a two-by-four with teeth flying through the air. Those are potentially lethal blows being delivered. … And that's what was figured out during this time period. And it was Illinois. The alternative could have been attempt murder in Illinois, murder in Indiana.
40 min of audioOral argument — Young v. Reiman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2010
After airing a lengthy, complicated case this morning, it was a dog bite. The child was five when bitten, not when he went to trial. … There is a more recent case, 96 case, that follows the comments of this IPI, Eyring v. Johnson.
32 min of audioOral argument — Richardson v. Booker
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2022
It's kind of hard to say that throwing a table isn't an act of violence. Well, it's an act of ‑‑ it's a bad decision, but I don't think it's an act of violence. … Him throwing money in the air, not on her, but in the air, is not an act of violence. She started the act of violence by picking up a water bottle, throwing it at him, and striking him in his face.
33 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.