Documents

Oral argument — InreFosamax(Alendronate Sodium)Products Liability Litigation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2024

So the first one they say is notice and comment rulemaking. … That was the notice and comment rulemaking. The rule says, here's what you need. Then we have to apply it.

Oral argument — Altice USA Inc v. NJ Board Public Utilities

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2022

It takes its rate as a given, and then it uses it to prorate for only that period of the month where service is provided. … And I think, Your Honors, that that reading of the Act is buttressed by the structure of the Cable Act, including the Express Savings Clause of 552d, which says that nothing in the Act should be construed

Oral argument — Carmen Aybar v. Secretary US Department of Homeland Security

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2018

, and particularly because there's really no countervailing benefit that the government can point to for the H-Act rule. … Ivar adjusted— Because there had to be a three-year period, then she got LPR, right? So the three-year period, she was actually backdated.

Oral argument — State Autov.PRODesign

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Well, I would suggest that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is looking at that after acquired vehicle clause because they're looking at the language in the Act which is talking about the purchase of additional … The last time the Supreme Court commented on the insurance commissioner and his relationship to the motor vehicle financial responsibility law, it was to state that the court had the commissioner had completely

Oral argument — United States v. Small

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2023

Before that period. Well, during that... Actually, you're right. During that period. During the three-year period. Well, I want to... … This isn't a comment about your client specifically. I'm simply saying the circuit has already kind of opined that if the prejudice is on the speculative side, we can't really consider that.

Oral argument — Beasley v. Howard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2020

And appellant takes a position in his opening brief that there should be no claim preclusion at all, meaning there is period, no claim preclusion. … Now, I'm not alone in understanding the comment this way.

Oral argument — Stephenson v. Cityof Phila

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

She was asked over and over again, what acts were you subjected to? Where was the discrimination? And she described in all, I believe it was nine different things. Two of those were comments. … Stevenson was the only sergeant, female sergeant, because there was another female sergeant during this entire period of whom we don't hear anything.

Oral argument — Hodgev.Bluebeards Castle

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 26, 2010

Your Honor, I think it really does not flesh out what should happen, unfortunately, in the transition period. … It's given under section, title four, section 32 I believe it is, the Virgin Islands enabling act for the Supreme Court carefully circumscribes its barrier court orders and the federal statute 48 U.S.C

Oral argument — Greatlakes v. Raiderretreat

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2022

If you want, forgive me for putting it this way, Your Honor, if you want to pluck out of the air that a choice of law, that a legal analysis that applies to one type of clause can, contrary to this court's … The first part says that choice of law clauses should be enforced, period, that even under a body of law, however, where they are not enforceable, they should still be enforced for those reasons.

Oral argument — Kisano Tradev.De v. Lemster

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2013

Let me ask you about a comment that's made in this Povich holding case, Povich v. Chase Manhattan. It's a Second Circuit case, 2003. … Well, he included that as a part of his RICO acts. It's not really – he's not claiming any damages resulting from that.

Oral argument — Espinal v. Atty Gen US

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2011

Well, part of that is at the time of the discussion of the, I believe, in the comment period after the statute was enacted and discussing whether to maintain the departure bar, the Attorney General clearly … That explains the limited time period.

Oral argument — USAv.Hodge

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 26, 2010

They decided to be lawless they decided to do these evil acts and now they have to face the consequences of these actions going down Further you make the comment about the grave consequences for going … My question isn't really so much that Any comment in there is objectionable so much as it appears from that You're You're repeatedly talking about them as together. They did these evil acts.

Oral argument — USA v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2013

Addressing AstraZeneca's comments first. Medco may only be one of many PBMs, but it was a very influential, very large, and very important PBM. So that's why it was important. … The kickback offer is illegal, and it violates the anti-kickback statute, and that violates the False Claims Act.

Oral argument — Kreiger v. Bank of America NA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2017

And that's very clear from the general comment to 1026.12b, which notes that this protection is an exception from the general rule that Regulation Z only applies to consumers. … And from the context of the Fair Credit Billing Act and the ability to bring a claim under that act, it doesn't restart the clock. Mr.

Oral argument — Millerv.Hendricks

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2009

When you get down to shorter periods of time, that's a different case, but that's not the case before this Court. Well, is it just time, though, Ms. Tully? … Certainly Judge Martini could comment on that, but I think that that's an issue that were he to decide that it was irrelevant to the public, I...

Oral argument — Sherzer,etalv.Homestar Mortgage Services,etal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2012

The court in Beach held that Congress had explicitly linked the right and the remedy in this section, and therefore the right to sue expired at the end of the period. And that is 156 F3rd Act 505. … Does this ultimately hurt the consumers, the Truth in Lighting Act?

Oral argument — Cumberland Mutual Fire Ins Co v. Express Products Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2013

Could it not look at the two orders in tandem and say, aha, I thought that the September 1 order might have been the last act anticipated, but clearly this is the last act, and maybe it's not even the … last act because an appropriate order follows.

Oral argument — Christie v. Commof SS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

, and met the actual definition under the Act. … The other case is an SSI case where there is no insured period and the question is when they became disabled.

Oral argument — NCAA v. Governor of the State of N J

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2016

acts to be done or prohibit acts to be done. … Could you comment on that? Two comments, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Mohammad Qatanani v. Attorney General USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2025

But here, the immigration judge never completely finalized his decision to even order those ministerial acts to take place. … Once it has happened, various ministerial acts are commanded to take place.