Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Raymond Shoemaker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2015

So the indictment was admitted as an exhibit for the jury and all that was aired out in front of the jury. … And ultimately it wound up having to look like the defendants and Chandler were in bed together and had been for a long period of time. And that severely damaged the case. Okay.

Oral argument — Albert Hill, III v. Tom Hunt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2019

It's not as clean, I grant you that, but it's the same concept. Because how can I be making a challenge to the disposition of property? That's not what I'm doing. … That is a case, the opening line from the Texas Supreme Court in the case was this is a will contest, period. And then it goes on to describe what was at issue. Husband dies.

Oral argument — Douglass v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2021

And Abilie's, we think that there was insufficient national context period and that would not meet our national context test. … The appellant's papers have not explained the limitations of the Federal Rules Enabling Act or the comments to the rules.

Oral argument — Clinton McGraw v. United Tugs, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2018

We believe it's plain air to have not awarded him anything for past lost wages. So now we get to going forward, and we feel that the award for future wages is also clearly erroneous. … whatever period of time we're talking about at the time of the injury.

Oral argument — Mansfield v. Williamson Cty

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2021

These air non attorney individuals acting in an administrative capacity. … There could be no liability period.

Oral argument — Blayne Williams v. City of Austin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017

This is not something that is a number of discrete acts. … How can a long period of time negate causation?

Oral argument — Meaghin Jordan v. Maxfield & Oberton Hold

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2020

This cop, this court commented or member of this court commented on this general principle. The evidence, the post sale evidence must be relevant to the theory of the defect that comes from month. … There was no jury instruction that the court could possibly have ever given in this case to cure the air because the evidence was unrebutted. The defendants argued to the case correctly.

Oral argument — Gamel v. Forum Energy Technol

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2022

Gamble was acting erratically. In short, that evidence is undisputed. … Bergeson, and the ten, fifteen minutes either way, the comment came up, that was actually made by Mr. Gamble.

Oral argument — Harrison v. Brookhaven Sch Dist

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2022

But if we were writing on a clean slate, put aside the precedent in our circuit, why wouldn't we go to the text of the statute? … And that's my editorial comment. We don't want to slice bologna too finely here, but I don't think it's compensation.

Oral argument — Thomas v. Cook Children's Health

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2023

He found, no, he found most of them were not, and he found, I think, maybe four, all he could find is that two comments, Dr. Thomas admitted, yes, he said, but there were nothing comments. … Not during a two-year period. On Dr. Iglesias, he had more during a two-year period. If you look at the two-year period, they were saying we're going to look at 17 through 19 was the relevant period.

Oral argument — Feld Motor Sports, Inc. v. Traxxas, L.P.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2017

So we're cleaning it up for you by showing you the models. No, Judge Prado, the court is not doing that. The New York courts that we cite explain how the process works this way. … So you can comment on it if you want to, but I know you'll follow what I said anyway, so. Understood, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Breaux v. Worrell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2025

Under the comments it essentially says that civil law representation is the same as common law agency. … This also speaks to the comments, though, that can be found in 2985.

Oral argument — Fairchild v. Coryell Cty

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2021

And that's that 45-minute period of where she bangs six minutes continuously on the door. Lovelady stops by at 8.02.51, and then she takes eight additional minutes. … Yes, the evidence was that she threw probably some sort of quick cleaning solution out the food slot at him as he was going by.

Oral argument — Texas Association of Mftr v. U.S. Consumer

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2019

There are other parts of the Consumer Product Safety Act that use banned hazardous product. … And in this case, as in other cases with all sorts of multimember commissions, Commissioners aired their disagreement. But the majority of Commissioners disagreed with that.

Oral argument — Annette Williams v. Texas Children's Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2019

Where is the discriminatory act other than this direct evidence you claim? … What is the discriminatory act? The discriminatory act is the termination. Okay. What's the discriminatory reason for the termination?

Oral argument — Terkel v. Centers for Disease

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2021

Your Honor, I don't think that possibility exists here, to think that another agency would act. … We don't think that the court could act here because this case is moot.

Oral argument — Dora Maldonado v. Ricardo Rodriguez, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2019

He did not testify that there were problems with any employees or any criminal misconduct that he had to clean house. Dora Munoz, he gave no explanation. … He just said he wanted his own person in it, period, and it was his right, just like when he'd been elected judge, he could pick his own coordinator, or he could pick his own employees.

Oral argument — Xenon Health, L.L.C. v. Mirza Baig

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 29, 2016

under the exclusive management services agreement was or was not a sham — and it's our position, although I admit this is not very well on the record, that in fact that number wasn't chosen out of thin air … I thought that the staff had to be the same while it's during the period before the job.

Oral argument — Jackson v. Wright

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2023

The provost was acting in the name of the university. The department chair was acting in the name of the university. This ad hoc committee was acting in the name of the university. … Yes, so he doesn't keep a clean distinction between those two types of motions.

Oral argument — Douglass v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2021

Well, I could explain that this is definitely not like Patterson in terms of there were only 11 temporary employees for a six-month period as in Patterson. … You have air carriers within the United States. And not even going to the subsidiaries that are wholly owned by NYK line that have even more substantial contacts with the United States.