Documents

Oral argument — BASF Corporation v. Johnson Matthey Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2019

There's nothing in any of this that says that they are going to act to reduce the NOx. There's nothing in ONO that says you're going to do this. … I guess I'll briefly address just some of the comments that Council made with respect to the 107 patent.

Oral argument — Blackman v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2009

Now, at that point, that becomes a discretionary act on their part. But if they see it, they take no notice of it because it's outside of the record. … It's not as if it was ephemeral, that somewhere in the thin air, it was out there somewhere, and they would have had to take judicial notice of it.

Oral argument — WARD v. USPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2010

This is a board case where an Air Force employee was removed months after the terrorist attacks on 9-11 because he threatened his supervisor and refused to do work. … They said, take the bad acts off the table, we look at it without the bad acts, we still conclude that it's within the range of reasonableness.

Oral argument — +Nippon Steel Corporation v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2006

I agree with the comments of the ITC's counsel with regard to what you should do under your hypothetical, which is if you, in fact, can't decide, you should remand with whatever findings you, in fact, … With all due respect, Your Honor, you will never have a completely settled, clean, no more disputes, no more questions on which the agency might have something to say.

Oral argument — DEY PHARMA v. SUNOVION PHARMA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2012

Well, it's already a point, but there's language in both Jansen and Karaka that I want you to comment on. … If it wasn't under settlement, but rather this was because that was the time period where they expire, that was the time period where...

Oral argument — R&L CARRIERS v. DRIVERTECH

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2011

And no, we did not have notice as to exactly how our products are contributing to the infringement because they didn't, in fact, identify any specific act of direct infringement. … No, but I would like to comment that we have Cleveland-based law firms on both sides of the V here, which makes me feel very close to home. Thank you for that, Your Honor. Thank you. Okay.

Oral argument — NORGREN v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2012

I think we both asked for some, so I assume they will use them as well You're not going to flow any water through them Compressed air, your honor Okay, have a second The boxes are open I think you should … There's no evidence in the record at all Of why a person of ordinary skill in the art Would choose that shape For this clamp Furthermore There's no evidence from a person really of that time In the time period

Oral argument — Mayo Foundation v. Iancu

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2019

And in pertinent part, during the rulemaking, there was a comment that was made. … It was comment number two we cited in our brief where the commenter noted that it would be unfair under that statute to count the time, any time after the notice is issued if it is reopened for any reason

Oral argument — Asia Vital Components Co. v. Asetek Danmark A/S

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2016

There was no attempt to clear the air. I think we have your argument. One more sentence. Thank you, Your Honor. … Any one further comment? Just one quick question. Mr.

Oral argument — Bianco v. Globus Medical, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2015

Could you comment on that? Sure, Your Honor. … It's section 39, comment H. They cite the first half of that comment, which says most jurisdictions draw a difference between new product ideas and trade secrets.

Oral argument — Giuliano v. SanDisk LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2017

I'd like to clean up a few quick things that appear to cause some confusion. … And, Your Honor, that fuels the inference here that all they're doing is trying to act like Mr.

Oral argument — Lynch v. McDonough

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2021

Let's assume we were writing on a clean slate. What do you think the test ought to be? The statute says approximate balance. How do you want to interpret that or clarify that or add to it? … If we have to determine what the law existed or what the interpretation of the benefit of the doubt and reasonable doubt rules were at the time of the Veterans Judicial Review Act of 1988, which is the

Oral argument — KEYnetik, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020

They tried to go down that road that there could be intervening acts, and certainly there could be things added within the algorithm because of the comprising language. … But I believe, you know, to address Judge O'Malley's comments about, you know, the period of time, you know, I think the specification clearly teaches that the time has to be short enough to ignore the

Oral argument — Harmonia Holdings Group, LLC v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2020

So there's no case saying that Harmonia has this indefinite period of time. Is there a regulation? … A couple of comments.

Oral argument — WARRIOR SPORTS v. DICKINSON WRIGHT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2010

Code and the Code of Federal Regulations of the time periods of when it can be reinstated, what a petitioner needs to show as far as why that payment wasn't done and the unavoidable delay standard and … And I think that that's what this court said in the air measurement case. I think that's correct.

Oral argument — Bryan v. McDonald

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2015

If you're now telling us that this came out of whole cloth or thin air or whatever, that's quite a new concept and quite a dramatic one. … The evidence from that time period shows only that there was dental trauma and teeth loss.

Oral argument — ALCESIA SRL v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2011

The ITC focused only on a time period after March 28, 2008. … With respect to the comments made about apparent authority, all these comments show that the record was incomplete.

Oral argument — ARMSTRONG v. TREASURY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2011

And the agency led us to believe that their only comment was no comment. … Armstrong interested in the period since December of 2007?

Oral argument — Apple Inc. v. Squires

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2026

They can open up a new comment period or amend the proposed rules and then have a new rule package. … or the new rule where the comment period has just closed, let's remember the PTO is not the only organ of the executive branch here.

Oral argument — +Elkem Metals v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2006

What you're doing is taking, you've accumulated these VAT credits over a long period of time from purchases of inputs consumed in other periods to produce other products, and you're using those credits … Amendments Act Amendments required by the Act and second there are important differences in the facts of this case as compared to the facts of those two earlier cases You're not saying that the new Act