Documents

Oral argument — City of Chicago v. Federal National Mortgage Assoc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2017

Well, they were entitled, but whether they were an owner for purposes of the Demolition Act is an open question that's at issue in this appeal. … During that period, Fannie Mae did not answer the complaint.

Oral argument — In re Estate of Compton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2012

And what the railroad does is come into the plant, hook onto it, and pull it out without saying anything to anybody around it, or attempting to clean it up when it's in their possession, because that's … the slow-acting asbestos, whether they have to say something before they take the action that releases the asbestos into the air where these people breathe it and it contributes to their illness the same

Oral argument — People v. DiBenedetto

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2017

Looking at your brief, you do not ask that it be remanded for a new sentencing period. You ask only that the count six be vacated. Correct. … Our argument is based on the closely balanced evidence prong, plain air review, as well as the fundamental rights prong.

Oral argument — Royal Continental Box v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2012

The issues kind of factually and legally tie into each other, so I think that I'll probably end up addressing a lot of those in my opening comments. … It is agreed that he was injured when he stepped back into a bucket of chemical cleaning solution and sustained a burn.

Oral argument — People v. O'Large

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2018

, according to their testimony, and the man with one of his hands in the air. … There's no testimony that she was in the alley for a prolonged period of time.

Oral argument — Mazzetta Company, LLC v. Felsenthal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2019

The question is, your comments apply to several different businesses. It's not exclusive to the seafood industry. … But counsel acts like you almost get a free pass if it's a restrictive covenant case.

Oral argument — People v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 19, 2013

That bit about an officer making a dice-throwing motion, air dice or something, that got nothing out of the defendant. The record is unequivocally clear. … But, you know, the police can only act reasonably, you know. That doesn't seem reasonable to me. Pardon me? That doesn't seem reasonable to me. You said it didn't seem reasonable to you.

Oral argument — Russell v. United Security Life and Health Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2011

I was struck by one comment, that once Buckley knew about the Vioxx history, we had the duty to contact Kenneth Russell. That's exactly what we did. … Obviously the carrier didn't get it, but they took those steps to assure they had an application they could act upon.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Renth

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2012

Nikki at the time worked at Scott Air Force Base and she was a what's called a contract employee and she had been at Scott Air Force Base for about 25 years also. … It was during a period of time. It was 2003-2004, I believe she testified. There's no evidence that the marriage was breaking down at that period of time.

Oral argument — Richter v. Prairie Farms Dairy, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2015

I don't recall any comment on the latches. There's nothing on the record about that? No, sir. So there's still a pending motion at the point of the trial court? No, sir. … It's a 2619 motion, based on a limitations period.

Oral argument — People v. Borizov

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2015

And furthermore, the state's attorney, and this also comes from case law, has an air of authority to him. … Your Honor, the comments complained of by the defendant were comments in response to rebuttal, and as we set forth in our brief, a lot of those, or most if not all of those comments, were invited by a

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Eagleton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2010

The general proposition from this court is, if a trial court says that it's considered the factors set forth in the Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, 503 and 504, that that's sufficient. … We tried to give it to the state of Illinois on a pretty regular basis, and they sought not to want to take that piece of property until we cleaned it up. There needs to be an affirmative step.

Oral argument — People v. Denning

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2026

It just, it's almost like it came out of thin air. … Deming's restitution hearing, and it wasn't fair because they just pulled it out of thin air.

Oral argument — Majmudar v. House of Spices

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2013

And based on a clean record of the Wage Payment Collection Act, we believe that Mr. Mashbedar is entitled to the attorney's fees and the interest that would have accrued on those wages. … Section three of the act dictates that employees must be paid wages earned. Section four describes the number of days within which wages earned must be paid following the end of the pay period.

Oral argument — People v. Mandarino

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2013

We have some live video footage of the way he acted in the field. Let's evaluate that. And that's when the officer started going into his evaluation of how he acted here. … In evaluating someone, you are giving your opinion on how they act.

Oral argument — Yankulova v. Village of Bensenville

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2010

And I raise that in my brief for the same reason here, is that we don't know, as Your Honor mentioned, we don't know why these 24 car accidents happen over a four-year period. … There is a duty for municipality to go clean burshes or to remove obstructions. There is a case which involves parked cars that were obstructing duty.

Oral argument — Presberry v. McMasters

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2021

The reason this case survives, and the reason the court aired, essentially comes down to the discovery. It's built into the era of the statute that is applicable to this case, the 1994 statute. … So those are my comments on the venue issue. As I say, I don't see this at all as a matter of first impression.

Oral argument — Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Bushnell v. Hulett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2012

But Section 78 has a comment that seems to say everything that I've been trying to say. … I just have a couple of, I guess, cleaning things that are just informational.

Oral argument — Bobek v. ABM Industries

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2018

If we would begin with Section 16 of the Act, Section 16 of the Act requires that the process and procedure before the commission shall be simple and summary, as reasonably may be. … And they fail to comment. And then now we find ourselves in this situation. It's on the wall behind me. It says, this is the other side. So, I ask that you do. Thank you.

Oral argument — Kieckhaefer v. Roscoe Township

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2020

That brief of a period would require that it have brake lights and turn signals. It's not a motor vehicle that you would be driving in the road, typically. … Um, there was a comment to demonstrative evidence in a heading that is not, that is not sufficiently preserve any air. It doesn't even identify. What's demonstrative evidence issue. Um, they didn't.