Documents

Oral argument — Fed Cetera LLC v. National Credit Service INC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2018

During the time of the applicable period. And Your Honor is correct that no work was awarded during the applicable period of this contract. … So I think that Your Honor's comment gets directly at the heart of the tension.

Oral argument — Jorjani v. New Jersey Institute

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2025

Do you think that's true or do you think that it's still we're only looking at it at the time period at which the termination decision took place? … Well, I think these faculty people are acting on their own behalf.

Oral argument — Nedal Elfar v. Township of Holmdel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2024

Elphar would enter into a consent order if merely by filing for a de novo appeal, your conviction vanished into thin air. There would be no reason to do that. … You know, we are slicing and dicing this, but why should we not adopt a rule that says that the time period not only is through your first conviction, but if you are retried, then the time period up to

Oral argument — Umland v. Planco Fin Ser

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Sinterior was not acting as a collection agent for or on behalf of the IRS. All they did was send out a 1099 DIV form. Here, Planko is acting as a collection agent. … They weren't acting as collectors. They were not acting as tax collectors in that case. They were not acting as a tax collector. But in that sense, it's not different.

Oral argument — Helen Mining Company v. Deptof Labor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2010

In the context of the Black Women's Benefits Act, Congress determined that it would be a 3-year period from when there was a medical determination that the minor was totally disabled due to pneumoconiosis … If I may make one final comment, you had a concern about what do you do with a new doctor with a misdiagnosis.

Oral argument — Thompson v. Real Estate Mortgage

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2013

But if we can't at least take a shot at the issue, then that whole period is going to go, it's lost. … He gave us a specific allegation that Chapman says, I do not pay my underwriters overtime, period.

Oral argument — Fraternal Order of Police Lodge1 v. City of Camden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2016

The comments on the forms? The comments on the forms. Okay. … But also Judge Barry in the Blackburn case says that SEPA doesn't require the court to determine whether the wrongful acts are true. That would be the antithesis of the intent of the statute.

Oral argument — Adler v. Gruma Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2024

or under a state arbitration act. … I'm not sure I understand why in Southwest folks who are unloading goods on the spot, intrastate, just because those goods were transported intrastate on an air carrier, why does that differ from what

Oral argument — Bank of Hope v. Chon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2019

You're talking about over a two-month period, the appellant sent some 45 letters. He sent the letters. … He could have gone to social media to explain his, to air his grievances, to say that he was being falsely accused by the bank and that he's being sued by the bank. You'd be right back here.

Oral argument — Farina v. Nokia Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2010

There's nothing in either the original Telecommunications Act or subsequent acts. … We have no comment. So here you've got a clearly a directive from Congress that the FCC is to act with regard to claims about safety or RF radiation. They conduct rulemaking.

Oral argument — Calhounv.Murray

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2012

And I'll be asking your colleague here across the aisle to comment on this too, but why do you say that? … How about commenting a little bit on the res judicata question? Of course. I will happily take us there.

Oral argument — In Re Schering Plough

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2009

And number two, the complaint itself actually does allege acts which would form the predicate of breaches of fiduciary duty through 2004. … Yeah, can I have just one comment? You referred to benefits, yes. Can you tell us where in the record there were benefits? The release that Mr.

Oral argument — Cecero v. Allstate Ins Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

It was not stipulated or agreed to by defense that she acted reasonably to maintain the heat. … But the policy itself doesn't spell out a specific time period.

Oral argument — Wallace v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2021

Is it that during that 13 years and nine month period, my previous question referred to, he had no period or periods of lucidity such that he could have filed for habeas. … He should have recognized that based on what he had in his possession, including stimulant induced psychosis from the from the 1980s as well as comments in just the days before.

Oral argument — Harris v. Kellogg Brown&Root

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 24, 2010

We believe that the combatant activities exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act grants us immunity from standing trial in this case. You're not being sued under the Federal Tort Claims Act. … And how do you explain, how does this, you didn't cite it, you didn't bring it forward on a 28-J letter, but I'm interested in your comments on the case of Martin v.

Oral argument — Holloway Jr v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2019

What about all the comments by the Supreme Court of the United States various justices have made observations your colleague made reference to Tennessee v. … If I understood Judge Funches question so your your comments didn't sound like they were answering his question about deterrence.

Oral argument — Regan v. Secretary US Navy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2025

Let's assume he was acting in good faith. Let's give him that. It's also possible that while he was acting in good faith, he blew the statute of limitations. Isn't that possible? … So our position is, is this paragraph would apply any time he's within that period. He's no longer within that period. But he never was. I mean, he only was while he was in school.

Oral argument — Altice USA Inc v. NJ Board Public Utilities

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2022

It takes its rate as a given, and then it uses it to prorate for only that period of the month where service is provided. … And I think, Your Honors, that that reading of the Act is buttressed by the structure of the Cable Act, including the Express Savings Clause of 552d, which says that nothing in the Act should be construed

Oral argument — State Autov.PRODesign

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Well, I would suggest that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is looking at that after acquired vehicle clause because they're looking at the language in the Act which is talking about the purchase of additional … The last time the Supreme Court commented on the insurance commissioner and his relationship to the motor vehicle financial responsibility law, it was to state that the court had the commissioner had completely

Oral argument — Beasley v. Howard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2020

And appellant takes a position in his opening brief that there should be no claim preclusion at all, meaning there is period, no claim preclusion. … Now, I'm not alone in understanding the comment this way.