Documents

Oral argument — United States v. James Lucero

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2020

But the owners of that land already knew exactly what the Clean Water Act required. … Based on those facts, the jury was properly able to find that his dumping scheme violated the Clean Water Act. I'll turn first to the argument that the Clean Water Act is unconstitutionally vague.

Oral argument — S. Thomas v. County of Los Angeles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2017

During the Thomas number one period of time, the class period, there are no records that identify the individuals who slept on the floor. … Are you making an argument that there was a different qualitative injury to people who slept in clean mattresses and clean cells and people slept on the floor in dirty cells?

Oral argument — Carl Woods v. State of Washington

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2012

But his complaints are really, you know, if you look at the 2007-2008 period of time, he's complaining about Mr. … It was basically got to clean up your act. Why is that an adverse action? In the disparate treatment context.

Oral argument — Tao v. Arovast Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2025

will act, the Supreme Court. … He had a pocket expense to pay for the air fryer, Your Honor. Well, he bought the air fryer. He got the air fryer. The air fryer has worked for him. It hasn't exploded or caused any injury to him.

Oral argument — Julia Bernstein v. Virgin America, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2021

by time period. … She pointed out the issue of the land, air traffic control, and the like.

Oral argument — United States v. Daniel Millis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2010

The defendant acknowledged his acts. He acknowledged what he did. And that was he put out sealed bottles of pure, clean water for migrants in distress. … Let's go back to your comment, because if this comes through in your briefs, you say where the person is going to use it.

Oral argument — Territory of American Samoa v. NMFS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2020

You have the right to petition and the right to sue on it, and that's part of the Clean Air Act, and also part of the APA. … The deeds of session is an applicable law, just like the Paper Reduction Act, the Information Act are considered relevant law.

Oral argument — De Anda Bramasco v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2009

period. … You mentioned at the outset of your comments that mediation would have been the most appropriate route. What's wrong with trying it now?

Oral argument — Fireman's Fund Ins v. Oregon Automobile

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2008

The way that these sites get cleaned up is by insurance money. Right. … So ultimately, NEMI, it turns out, have no coverage for the cost to clean this up.

Oral argument — Clark Co. Nat'l Res. v. Clark County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2003

The letter regulation wasn't subject to notice and comment rulemaking. Another issue is that this same agency has already been found in violation of the Clean Water Act for this same issue. … The Clean Water Act does not provide any definition of what is meant by reducing to the maximum extent practicable.

Oral argument — Jack Roy v. Laborer's Local 737

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2021

It's included repeated comments over a two-year period, references by the COVR, defendant COVR, the individual who orchestrated this termination, introducing Mr. … These comments were stray comments, even though they were made by the person who orchestrated the termination and repeatedly made over a course of two years.

Oral argument — KINITI-WAIRIMU, etc v. MUKASEY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2009

Kiniti started on a clean slate with the IJA in the absence of improperly admitted research. … His father had been detained briefly for a period of 10 days, and he did not know the current whereabouts of his father at that time.

Oral argument — Soria Gonzalez v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2012

I respect the comment, but I am not in agreement with that assertion. What I would say, Your Honor, is the term, the proper term is the statutory bar expired. … The board acted well within its broad discretion to deny that motion to reopen. Does it make any difference if we remand?

Oral argument — Donna Greene v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2014

Jeffrey Chin of Beering on behalf of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Carolyn W. Colvin. … That was just a benign comment.

Oral argument — United States v. Daniel Kiraz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2017

Those are the overt acts alleged as overt act number four in Count 1. Mr. … That means that Daniel had to take the extra step of removing the six months of house and door that was recorded on the spreadsheet in order to give what I'll call a clean spreadsheet, a clean false spreadsheet

Oral argument — City & County of San Francisco v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2022

And as a result of the vacater of one of those necessary authorizations, the permit would not be effective just for the purposes of the Clean Water Act. … And you're creating exactly the situation that Arkansas versus Oklahoma said the Clean Water Act did not do.

Oral argument — Susan Dyer Reynolds v. Dean E. Preston

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 30, 2024

But nonetheless Reynolds is entitled to qualified immunity because the Linkey test was necessarily not known to him at the time he acted during the relevant time period of this case which is 2020. … I mean it's what it's wiped clean as if that decision never existed for our purposes. Am I reading Camreta wrong?

Oral argument — Kiniti-Wairimu v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2008

Kiniti started on a clean slate with the IJ in the absence of the improperly admitted research. … His father had been detained briefly for a period of 10 days, and he did not know the current whereabouts of his father at that time.

Oral argument — Stephen Schmid v. Sonoma Clean Power

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2017

He made a judgment not to opt-out, but does he have to go through the act of opting-out? Does he have to sit down and go ahead and take the action to put a stamp on the envelope? … It appears to be to the whole Sonoma Clean Power Program. Well, that's true.

Oral argument — United States v. Ibrahim Yousef

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2009

They deliberated for over seven hours, which was a substantial period of time, and then returned the verdict. … And second, it issues a clean slate instruction, ordering the jurors to start the liberations over and disregard anything that happened.