Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
949 results
0.15s
Oral argument — Yeison Ortiz v. Alejandro Mayorkas
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2021
So we believe that that is arbitrary and capricious because in this particular case, this was an ice air operations flight. It was completely controlled by the United States government. … You know, so there were many opportunities in that five-year period for Mr. Ortiz to seek the relief that he wanted before the immigration court in terms of, you know, relief from removal.
44 min of audioOral argument — Larry Hurlburt v. Juliet Black
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2019
And I don't believe it was in Section 305 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act that became 1322 C2. … In your brief, at least twice, you cite a law review article and commentator. I'm sorry. In your brief, you twice cite a law review article and indicate it's from a commentator.
74 min of audioOral argument — NLRB v. Pessoa Construction Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2015
Membrano was owed back pay from the time period where he began interim employment to the end of the back pay period. … Marimbrino acted outside of normal protocol or normal procedures, and it simply has not done so here.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Under Seal
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2019
I see I'm cutting into my rebuttal time, so I would respectfully reserve the rest of my comments for that time. All right. Thank you, counsel. Mr. Hines. Morning, Your Honors. … The act of issuing a grand jury subpoena. It's not an obstruction case. It's a question of whether there's no charges here.
53 min of audioOral argument — The Chesapeake Bay Foundation v. Weyerhaeuser Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2014
There was no evidence of anything other than wetness in this whole period of time. … It was not worth commenting on is what they said. It would not be productive for them to comment on it. But I think, Your Honor, that we have to look at that Vaughan report.
46 min of audioOral argument — Marianne Iacopelli v. Robert Bilyard
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2019
That's a comment on the fact. But I find it difficult that Billiard can argue that he relied on a statute. … Those that are still up in the air, that's not what you do. That's not the question.
52 min of audioOral argument — William Lins v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2020
Lins for an extended period of time. It was not until another male patient not Mr. Lins someone else raised a complaint against Dr. … So the court did make that comment in a footnote in Souter. That comment in a footnote in Souter has been repeated in other decisions in the body of the opinion and I would say two things about that.
42 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Quotez Pair
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2023
The central issue raised in this case that I'm going to devote the majority of my comments on today is the question of whether Mr. … He hasn't even alleged that he contracted COVID during this period.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Daniel Sanchez
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2018
So even if he had gotten a six-month period of supervised release, he would have still violated and been revoked? Yes, ma'am. … I think that the remedy that we seek to get there, first the Court would have to determine in a factual basis, and you saw Judge Dumas' comments in the record, whether or not he is in fact under the new
15 min of audioOral argument — Deanna Evans v. International Paper Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2019
Do you think the facts here approach that level of severity of the comments? Those were the comments of a sexual nature that were described in detail. … All of those acts are inconsistent with the retaliatory cause. If they wanted to retaliate, they could fire, or they could demote her, or they could do other acts in between.
37 min of audioOral argument — United States v. James Treacy
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016
There was testimony that the jury heard that not any continual offense but a specific act by your client he made during the relevant time period that would require the use of this number. … I don't have a question, but I have a comment. Yes, sir. I don't particularly like your response right there when you say I've only got two to three minutes.
31 min of audioOral argument — City of Rockingham v. FERC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2017
But that's the time period during which the recreation flows are allocated. … They could submit comments to the commission. I mean, they did submit ample comments to the commission. It would require their consultants to – But can they submit data? With their comments, sure.
48 min of audioOral argument — Travelers Casualty v. Jeld-Wen Holding, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2025
It predates at some point in time prior to Travelers' policy period. … They were going to pay their $40 million in one period or the other.
44 min of audioOral argument — Steven Albert v. Brooke Lierman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2025
The Maryland statute is based on one of the many uniform acts, for example, the UCC. And most states have adopted a version of that act. … If you think about it, if there were longer periods of time, which the law doesn't require longer periods of time, but if there were longer periods of time, you lose the remedial purpose because the longer
44 min of audioOral argument — Xing Yang v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2014
He did not commit fraud for the purposes of gaining a benefit under the Immigration and Naturalization Act. … It does seem unlikely that she would comment on the first two questions that there's signaling and not comment.
37 min of audioOral argument — United States ex rel. Deborah Sheldon v. Allergan Sales, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2025
In most False Claim Act cases, the court determines falsity and then determines scienter. … So your operative complaint relies pretty heavily on the CMS proposed rule and comment in 2006-2007, that time period.
50 min of audioOral argument — Edward Gelin v. Kyle Shuman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2022
Commentator- Mr. … Commentator- I agree, Your Honor, and I almost thought about starting that way.
38 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Germaine Cannady
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2022
And it's reasonable in light of the case law controlling mandate rule period. What would she have concluded about the mandate rule in your view? … Rider-Longmaid, I don't think you came up for air once during that argument.
38 min of audioOral argument — Terrance Reeves v. Pete Hegseth
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2025
And mind you, everyone is working remotely for about a three month period during the pandemic. They come back. I believe it was around the August or September time period. … I have just a few seconds left, so I want to touch briefly on the dismissal of the Discrete Act race discrimination claim.
40 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Roger Locklear
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2022
One point that was raised, and I assume you agree with Judge Wilkinson's comment about in terms of this was particularized to him, correct? Yes. … The probation officer cannot act with purposes of harassment, cannot act arbitrarily and capriciously.
47 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.