Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

1,162 results

0.19s

  • Oral argument — Johnny Long v. GSDMIdea City, L.L.C.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2015

    The contracting officer for the Air Force said that all the representations, certifications, about being accurate, complete, current, all of those were conditions of payment. … And as for the United States not coming in, the trustee made that comment also.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Michael Adkins v. US Dept of Agriculture, e

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2018

    You're saying you are not covering them for the 2014-15 crop year, period. That was the position of the NAD. … That dealt with the Food Security Act of 1985 and a food stamp program.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Abajian-Salon v. San Antonio

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2026

    They testified that she also hit a compressor and damaged the air valve, and that it cost $400 to fix it. The Texas Penal Code defines criminal mischief to be damage in any amount of money. … She miscites to the records with regard to what happened with the radio, which was claimed to be accidental and not part of any intentional act in this site.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Douglass v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2021

    And Abilie's, we think that there was insufficient national context period and that would not meet our national context test. … The appellant's papers have not explained the limitations of the Federal Rules Enabling Act or the comments to the rules.

    62 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Navarre v. AIG Prop Cslty

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2025

    But to get to the language of the May addendum and the June 2021 side agreement, these agreements don't just pop up out of air. It's subject to negotiations, okay? … whereas paragraphs, in paragraph number four, and this is the exact same language in both the side agreement and the addendum, it says, contemporaneously with the seller's and the buyer's execution of the act

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Patrick Lanier

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2017

    And this is not the kind of clean-cut harboring of helping somebody hide physically. It was something else going on. I don't quite know what she meant by that. … Before I get into the email, the exposure email, I want to make one comment about Ultimate Lifestyle.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — State of Mississippi v. DOE

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2025

    So this 110-day comment period in your review is really kind of two separate comment periods. … The Act requires DOE to periodically revisit these standards every six years, and DOE couldn't do that. So Congress's purpose was to speed along these rules.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Trinity Marine Products, Inc. v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2015

    He fall squarely into the Harrison dynamic in which he's acting upon intuition, suspicion, impulse. … I mean, given the government's lack of clean hands throughout this matter, I mean, why isn't that one more pebble on the scale of equitable stop?

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ayon v. Austin Independent

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2025

    Now, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and related disability statutes such as Section 504 in the ADA create a whole other body of jurisprudence that governs this area, but we're looking … The only video footage that we have of abuse is from the three-week period prior to the outcry. That is when the school bus was arriving early at school and the bus monitor was leaving.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Jubert

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2025

    We allow for this public airing of grievances. … He pleaded guilty to, in the words of the statute, a pattern of conduct composed of two or more acts. There's the factual basis for the conviction, which ticks off a whole bunch of acts that he took.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Simmons v. Brotherhood Mutual Ins

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2026

    Well, I take the comment as said. So right now, as we sit here, there's nothing that you can point to that would corroborate what the deceased child said. … I'm just trying to put it back to this verbal act thing.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Tenth Street Residential Assn v. City of Dallas, T

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2020

    TSRA members also act as interested persons under subsection I. … Well, if this all goes on long enough, all those structures will be eligible for demolition under section J as an imminent public danger, but that's just a rhetorical comment. Mr.

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Meaghin Jordan v. Maxfield & Oberton Hold

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2020

    This cop, this court commented or member of this court commented on this general principle. The evidence, the post sale evidence must be relevant to the theory of the defect that comes from month. … There was no jury instruction that the court could possibly have ever given in this case to cure the air because the evidence was unrebutted. The defendants argued to the case correctly.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Rosie Diggles

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2019

    There's also the concern of just fairness to the district court, and that goes to the air preservation issue. … Counsel, I'm sorry, did you have an answer or comment to Judge Higginbotham?

    68 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Clinton McGraw v. United Tugs, Incorporated

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2018

    We believe it's plain air to have not awarded him anything for past lost wages. So now we get to going forward, and we feel that the award for future wages is also clearly erroneous. … whatever period of time we're talking about at the time of the injury.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Beltran v. Lockheed Martin

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2026

    Beltran in his deposition He didn't say it was because he had these two elements of discipline within the same period of time or whether one was warranted or not What he said was, I thought this was insubordination … decision-making because of the protected activity as opposed to the second discipline Or these other people in those situations they hadn't engaged in protected activity So I just I don't think it's as clean

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — National Relig Broadcasters v. FCC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2025

    The agency acts . . . the agency acted as a full commission in order to withdraw the order. The agency would, again, have to act as a full commission. … And so they appear in a very different context from the Communications Act provisions.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Allegiance Bank Texas v. M/V Lake Limo

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2018

    The market, as Judge Willett commented, set the price at that auction in that day. … So it would have cleaned up the issues between you all, but they may have come in with some issues against all of you. That's correct.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Thomas v. Cook Children's Health

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2023

    He found, no, he found most of them were not, and he found, I think, maybe four, all he could find is that two comments, Dr. Thomas admitted, yes, he said, but there were nothing comments. … Not during a two-year period. On Dr. Iglesias, he had more during a two-year period. If you look at the two-year period, they were saying we're going to look at 17 through 19 was the relevant period.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Joseph Robertson v. Chevron USA, Incorporat

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2015

    That's the ridiculous setup of the Class Action Fairness Act. … The only requirement, the only jurisdictional amount requirement for jurisdiction over a mass action is $5 million, period, end of story.

    44 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.