Documents

Oral argument — WHITEMAN v. TRANSPORTATION

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2012

In her EEO claims, yes, there was allegations of harassment, but the issues regarding assault and some of the operational errors in terms of, for instance, in November 2002, when she was another air traffic … McAllister, in a New Jersey court, a company claimed that a seaman acted in one role. And then later in district court in New York, they claimed he acted in another role.

Oral argument — Natural Resources Defense v. Ross

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2019

It waived the five-year exemption period. The regulation is in effect right now and it has been all along, but the five-year exemption period has been waived by the government of Mexico. … And this was the appellee's own comment.

Oral argument — Southwestern Management, Inc. v. Ocinomled, Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2016

Since 1970, Congress has amended the Lanham Act in ways that augment the policy. … Those aired all over the country. We put in evidence of how many people saw them, and this is just the beginning. He went on his Sirius radio show. He talked about his Delmonico restaurants.

Oral argument — Kendall v. Collins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2025

It's not like you can just pull out a thin air. Well, I don't like this, so I think it's unreasonable. And because I've made that determination, now I can look at factors to substantiate it. … Not at this time, Your Honor, but if you would allow me to think on it, and if I could have just a short rebuttal period, then I'd be happy to try to answer that question more effectively.

Oral argument — SCA Hygiene Products v. First Quality Baby Products

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 19, 2015

You cite Walker as a commentator on the particular issue, but there was a more recent commentator to the 1952 act, and that's Federico, who said, he stated a proposition that the defense is holistic in … Federico's comment was sufficient basis to distinguish patent law, but I also think that we need to be fair about what his comment really is.

Oral argument — Eregli Demir ve Celik Fabrikalari T.A.S. v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2026

So a couple of comments. … Can you provide any help and say, here's why it makes sense that at the investigation stage, there is this clean exclusion, you know, we're not interested in you any longer.

Oral argument — SCA Hygiene Products v. First Quality Baby Products (EnBanc)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 19, 2015

You cite Walker as a commentator on the particular issue, but there was a more recent commentator to the 1952 act, and that's Federico, who said, he stated a proposition that the defense is holistic in … And we simply don't have that in the Patent Act. We don't have that. And the support that the defenders of laches have proposed a comment from Mr.

Oral argument — State of Vermont v. MPHJ Technology Investments

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2015

and the BCPA Act. … Well, the state has moved for reconsideration, and so that's up in the air, but he did keep it for now, subject to the motion for reconsideration. So what would happen were you to...

Oral argument — Chan v. EEOC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2020

I meant that there was appraisal period to give persons additional opportunity to perform, not suggesting that there's a discretion to act in an arbitrary or capricious manner. … You want to have any comment on that? Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Rose v. Wilkie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2018

And everybody else whose claims were already pending, you're suggesting that Congress should have stepped in and said, okay, you have to devote all your resources to cleaning up your backlog. … The rant letter you offered him gives him nothing that would expedite his BVA decision from the period of time when it has been certified to the period of time when there will be a decision.

Oral argument — BMW of North America, LLC v. Theodore & Associates, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2020

next unless it's any questions on 1446 well just the one you answered already so I'd like to go to the written description yes the written description issues with respect to 1451 okay there the board aired … upon by the patent owner is a discussion of how you assemble their chassis where they say you suitably couple components together that's not a structure suitable coupling that is essentially a method act

Oral argument — Martin v. Wilkie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2018

And everybody else whose claims were already pending is suggesting that Congress should have stepped in and said, okay, you have to devote all your resources to cleaning up your backlog. … The rant letter you offered him gives him nothing that would expedite his BVA decision from the period of time when it has been certified to the period of time when there will be a decision.

Oral argument — JUNIPER NETWORKS v. SHIPLEY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2011

Now, Juniper in its papers relies on the theory of continuous act or the fact that this information on the website remained viewable into the limitations period. … on the website represent continuing acts and each one triggers another five year period?

Oral argument — Hamill v. Collins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2025

The Appeals Modernization Act fundamentally altered the procedure for Veterans' Benefits Appeals. In its changes, the statute abrogates the existing common law doctrine of implicit denials. … And so your current rating is at 40% and your request for an increased rating is denied, period.

Oral argument — Giuliano v. SanDisk LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2017

I'd like to clean up a few quick things that appear to cause some confusion. … And, Your Honor, that fuels the inference here that all they're doing is trying to act like Mr.

Oral argument — Lynch v. McDonough

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2021

Let's assume we were writing on a clean slate. What do you think the test ought to be? The statute says approximate balance. How do you want to interpret that or clarify that or add to it? … If we have to determine what the law existed or what the interpretation of the benefit of the doubt and reasonable doubt rules were at the time of the Veterans Judicial Review Act of 1988, which is the

Oral argument — Ravi v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2024

They got, you know, the acceptance – I'm using air quotes, acceptance papers. And then they came back to the university and said, I don't want to do this. … Do you have a closing comment? Yeah. We respectfully request the Court affirm the judgment of the trial court. Thank you, Counsel. Ms. Nicholson has some rebuttals.

Oral argument — Greenidge v. Collins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2026

Dover had presented his claim and the board acted without authority, different kind of authority, but they still acted without authority nonetheless. … You still would have said, getting rid of this case, which was all you were seeking, the board decision, which was air, even if what it did was then allow you to go file a new case, would have made you

Oral argument — Blackman v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2009

Now, at that point, that becomes a discretionary act on their part. But if they see it, they take no notice of it because it's outside of the record. … It's not as if it was ephemeral, that somewhere in the thin air, it was out there somewhere, and they would have had to take judicial notice of it.

Oral argument — NORTHROP CORPORATION v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2012

And the court said, look, we have, you know, it's clear that the IRS kept an open mind when it considered the comments received during the comment period so there's no APA violation. … So there's no evidence that the IRS kept an open mind because we don't have that final regulation that came after the notice and comment period which shows us that the IRS, after receiving the comments