Documents

Oral argument — Vineland v. Bureauof Alcohol

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Unless the Court wishes that I direct my comments elsewhere, I propose to spend my initial comments, or the time available to me, initially discussing the standard of the director's review of the ALJ decision … With regard to the last comment, the Director really didn't find eight violations.

Oral argument — NationalCollegiatev.Governor of Stateof NJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 3, 2019

Well, there's no question based on the Sprint case, based on instant air freight, that the determinative date is the ultimate decision on the merits. … The hindsight here would take you back to the entire period. I said, well, okay, with hindsight, let's take a look at what happened.

Oral argument — Laniado v. Certified Credit&Collection Bureau

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2017

Your Honor, this is a rather straightforward claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the FDCPA. In this action, Ms. … I have not seen a case in the third circuit commenting either way on that, other than the Peterson decision, which states that there is no need to repeat those validation rights.

Oral argument — United States v. Douglas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2016

So what that means is the individual must have the authority to govern that specific wrongful act. … Well, the government must have seen them, because the government commented on them on the record. Absolutely. Obviously, the court commented about them on the record. That's correct.

Oral argument — In Re Denby-Peterson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 23, 2019

One is when you turned it over, and the preference avoidance proceedings happens to take back things that were dispensed within whatever the period, 90 days, whatever the period is. … Can you comment on that? Your Honor is correct about avoiding the use of Collier. Look, as the Court has noted, this is the majority view of the Courts of Appeals.

Oral argument — United States v. Merlino

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2015

Efforts, affirmative acts on behalf of the court were being made before the period expired to schedule the date. … And I think even, I know the courts mentioned legislative intent, but when we look to the legislation and the act itself and what the purposes of the act are under that scenario, all of the Dolan factors

Oral argument — Bayervs Monroe Cty Children

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

And, you know, why are they acting out in this particular manner? … You have not only the Child Protective Act, which is 23, but you also have the Juvenile Detention Act, which is 42 Pennsylvania CSA.

Oral argument — Gilliam v. US Dept Agriculture

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2021

The lack of notice and comment rulemaking. There's none here. … The first is by saying it refers to all food needs during the period of the pandemic.

Oral argument — Keith Slatowski v. SIG Sauer Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2025

This gun, for some period of time, was put back into circulation. … Now, if you get, let's say, a pen or something into a holstered trigger, that can go sort of at an angle, and the holster can act as a lever when that object pulls it.

Oral argument — United States v. Donte Taylor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2021

The person could have an air horn come into the court naked, running around, blowing that, and the court couldn't say, stop, you can no longer represent yourself. … Petropalo is making a good point that you acted prematurely. Don't act prematurely. Follow, go through, touch the bases so that you've given yourself a good record.

Oral argument — United States v. Velazquez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2013

Quickly, your light is on, but would you comment on the nature of prejudice if we were to find that there was not reasonable diligence? … Judge Du Bois found that the government had acted with reasonable diligence.

Oral argument — P.P. v. West Chester Area School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2009

If that's a two-year period, and then there's a second two-year period about when the hearing officer can adjudicate decisions, which goes two years back beyond that. … Such as statutes like the Post-Conviction Relief Act in the state of Pennsylvania, where there the legislature did say we want a one-year grace period.

Oral argument — Galena v. Leoneetal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2010

But the agenda leaves time for public comment. Did he do it during the public comment time? Well, the public comment section is at the beginning of the meeting. … Isn't your position that what the Sunshine Act permits you to do is object, not object and comment?

Oral argument — United States v. Fumo

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 25, 2011

At a minimum, that juror should have been brought into the courthouse and questioned about whether or not the acts that were alleged had occurred. … Just a few things I want to comment. Let me start with Ms. Arnao because I didn't say much about her. Mr. Egan sets forth a number of reasons that someone might give Ms.

Oral argument — Duhring Resource Company v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2018

And so it's a forbearance period. A notice period. It's not a forbearance period. It's both. It's an accommodation and consultation period that actually came out of T.W. Phillips. … Remember, even back in 2000, when the things at issue in this lawsuit happened, 2007, 2008, that was the period of time when the district court Minard Run 2 praised the government for acting in a spirit

Oral argument — Kellermanv.St.Margaret

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

So the minimum during that period until May. So about 8, 9, 10 months period. The employer is alleging it's November. I'm not accepting that for purposes of the factual dispute, Your Honor. … So there's a time period.

Oral argument — Grossbaum V.Genesis Genetics Institute,LLC,etal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 28, 2012

I believe that that brief was the subject of comment by Judge Brown prior to the case. Before the conclusion of the period for filing a substantive brief. … A waiver is an intentional act. It certainly wasn't an intentional act to waive that.

Oral argument — United States v. Chapman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 19, 2018

One thing the Commonwealth comments on, I mean the government comments on is that Mr. Chapman said he didn't know if what he had would persuade the court. So it must not have been worthwhile. … In this case, Judge Brand had delayed the sentencing for an extended period of time. The defendant had an ample period of time to prepare for the sentencing.

Oral argument — Cappucciov.Prime Capital Fundingllcetal

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 25, 2011

period was a three-year period, and she properly rescinded, and the loan should have been rescinded. … So the question is, was that burden intended to be more than just procedural appendage, as the commentator calls it in my briefing, or was it intended to really heighten what is necessary to overcome the

Oral argument — John Saranchuk v. Dan Lello

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2019

There were comments made to them that, you know, if you continue on this behavior, you're all going to lose your jobs. … The waiver argument, which we've made in response to the court's request for additional briefing on De Forte, which points out the difference between the Borough Act, the Borough Code and the Tenure Act