Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Raquan Scott

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2026

And if it was used before or after, under this case, they keep focusing on while committing, they say during, and it says it doesn't include the acts that do not constitute elements. … And your hypothetical Judge Heitens is exactly correct that propping open a door or window is just as much of a use as firing into the air or into the ground or against a victim.

Oral argument — Sayed Omargharib v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2014

I have two comments. … So this aspect's really up in the air right now, and... Okay. We are where we are. Thanks. Thank you. Appreciate your candor. All right, Ms. Lewis. First, yes.

Oral argument — Marc Hall v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2021

Somebody tell you it's six millimeters, and you already have reduction in air capacity. I mean, it's interesting. … If you don't have a comment on it, I'm totally fine not hearing from you on it. I just wanted to know if you did what it was. No, I did not, sir.

Oral argument — United States v. Lee Elbaz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2021

believe 1349 actually has an overt act requirement. … And the question isn't how similar are all these different lists floating in the air. And the question isn't even one of confusion.

Oral argument — Moke America LLC v. Moke International Limited

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2024

You can go to the definition of trademark in the Lanham Act it's any word, name, symbol device or combination I have the red light is it okay if I continue? … Two other points I want to make in response to my worthy adversary's comments. Number one, at the beginning of the trial, the judge even says the only issue here is priority.

Oral argument — NLRB v. Pessoa Construction Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2015

Membrano was owed back pay from the time period where he began interim employment to the end of the back pay period. … Marimbrino acted outside of normal protocol or normal procedures, and it simply has not done so here.

Oral argument — Sammie Stokes v. Bryan Stirling

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2022

If the State inadvertently forfeits them – so in Day, for example, the State, I think, had miscalculated the limitations period – the Court has discretion then to reach the issue, although it's not required … It's a limitation on the federal court's authority to act. It is restricted. It is mandatory.

Oral argument — United States v. Kenneth Ravenell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2023

that we don't even need, and those overt acts go into the limitations period. … period?

Oral argument — Juliette Grimmett v. Nancy Freeman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2022

And, of course, we know the law that says that we presume that the legislature acts with awareness of the law and... … Right, but they can't act with awareness of a Supreme Court decision that hadn't been decided yet.

Oral argument — The Chesapeake Bay Foundation v. Weyerhaeuser Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2014

There was no evidence of anything other than wetness in this whole period of time. … It was not worth commenting on is what they said. It would not be productive for them to comment on it. But I think, Your Honor, that we have to look at that Vaughan report.

Oral argument — No Mid-Currituck Bridge-Concerned Citizens v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2022

So, you know, us requesting the North Carolina Public Records Act is not a substitute for NEPA. … And what the plaintiffs in this case wanted was that public democratic decision-making tool of the National Environmental Policy Act where we could review all of the information and comment on it and advocate

Oral argument — U.S. Tobacco Cooperative Inc. v. Big South Wholesale of VA Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2018

Small were federal employees acting within the scope. … And so they restated what their income was for the time period in question from these operations. And so they made $6 million apiece in a little less than two years from it.

Oral argument — Goldman Sachs Bank USA v. Rhea Brown

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2026

And so a couple comments on that. First of all, here we don't have to claim. … One case that's certainly in the air is the Second Circuit's opinion from Hill, in which the Second Circuit declined to, or, you know, compelled arbitration of a stay violation claim.

Oral argument — United States v. Daniel Sanchez

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2018

So even if he had gotten a six-month period of supervised release, he would have still violated and been revoked? Yes, ma'am. … I think that the remedy that we seek to get there, first the Court would have to determine in a factual basis, and you saw Judge Dumas' comments in the record, whether or not he is in fact under the new

Oral argument — United States v. James Treacy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016

There was testimony that the jury heard that not any continual offense but a specific act by your client he made during the relevant time period that would require the use of this number. … I don't have a question, but I have a comment. Yes, sir. I don't particularly like your response right there when you say I've only got two to three minutes.

Oral argument — Deanna Evans v. International Paper Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2019

Do you think the facts here approach that level of severity of the comments? Those were the comments of a sexual nature that were described in detail. … All of those acts are inconsistent with the retaliatory cause. If they wanted to retaliate, they could fire, or they could demote her, or they could do other acts in between.

Oral argument — Michael Herlihy v. DBMP, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2025

So the claimants would then go into courts around the country and pursue their claims over the period of years and they'd keep filing them, right? That's what would happen. Well, no. … It's done under the clear air standard for facts, use of discretion review. If it's a good-faith bankruptcy.

Oral argument — United States v. Irek Hamidullin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2017

Your Honor, I'm not aware of a kind of formal pronouncement by the government in between those periods. … I had to look up in the air to see them. I agree with that, Your Honor, as a former enlisted man.

Oral argument — Amy Bryant v. Jim Woodall

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2021

And I will grant you that that's not completely irrelevant, but isn't the more relevant period of time the time, the more recent history when the legislature actively chose to amend the statute, to change … And the district court did not clearly air in holding that the statements from the district attorney Woodall did not address future enforcement.

Oral argument — Yasmin Reyazuddin v. Montgomery County, Maryland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2020

So I'm just trying to understand how that's a judicially sanctioned act and what case law you base that on. Sure. … We know that based on the district court's comments from the May 2016 status comments. You can see that at Joint Appendix 72.