Documents

Oral argument — GE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS v. AGILIGHT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2013

Rainey ended, the question of an opening is not one which this Court needs to write on a clean slate. … I have no further comments. All right. Thank you, Mr. Rainey. Thank you.

Oral argument — Comm For Fair Beam Imports v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2008

Did not comment on evidence. So what? I mean, where there's a massive record, no tribunal comments on every single piece of evidence is not practical, not required, probably not even really possible. … So I think because the commission in these is doing projections, certainly the commission was acting reasonably, not doing projections based solely on this three-month period, particularly given other

Oral argument — Baxalta Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2020

Isn't it true that the really confusing comment occurred early in the Markman hearing before Genentech's oral argument? … Just again, just to make sure I'm airing everything out.

Oral argument — AD HOC SHRIMP v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2011

For TIEMEI, as Commerce explained, the additional CEP sales reported by TIEMEI were sales that had shipment dates prior to the period of review, but invoice dates within the period of review. … The Department of Commerce and the Court of International Trade both acted well within their discretion here.

Oral argument — Touchcom v. Bereskin & Parr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 30, 2009

But that filing is the most significant act to be taken in connection with the retainer. The attorneys were retained to secure a US patent, and the most significant act is the filing of the patent. … They intended to file it before the patent office, period. And that prosecution was a failure in properly prosecuting the patent application.

Oral argument — Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2018

And she's now maintaining that their position now equates to the same thing, no variation, period. … He did count, in violation of Azutech and Lucent, lost profits and royalty on the same infringing acts. He double counted lost profits and additional royalty on the same infringing acts.

Oral argument — Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Slayback Pharma LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2024

And he specifically commented on Dr. Brandt's demeanor on the stand and characterized him as, I think, one of the best witnesses he had, most credible witnesses he had ever seen. … You can't carefully perform a series of acts without using effort. And the judge was persuaded by that testimony that more than minimal effort was required to dispense the drug. Dr.

Oral argument — Gomez-Rodriguez v. Army

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2023

The issue before the court today is whether the MSPB aired when it based on two charges. … He says, if you're asking me a theoretical question, had other officers similar acts, then yes, I believe that would have required consideration under those factors of penalty of disparate treatment.

Oral argument — K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2014

of the request for a deadline extension was that the contracting officer in December 2006 to January 2007 couldn't act on it because that was actually in litigation. … Early in the contract period, when they asked for the modifications and then decided not to do it.

Oral argument — Sabo v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2017

said in that case, and it was a patent case and not a class action for one, but it said that in the next sentence after the one that the parties of the plaintiffs referred to, it says that dismissal acts … Here, it's a lot more complicated, a lot more up in the air, a lot more involvement by the Court, but they are a conditional and there is a dismissal.

Oral argument — JS PRODUCTS v. STANDLEY LAW

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2011

We're setting a four-month period. … Stahl's comments with respect to the timing?

Oral argument — ROAD AND HIGHWAY BUILDERS v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2012

Aren't you arguing here that the government acted in bad faith? … In fact, Ampro, although there's language in the case that talks about applying clear air to— You're referring to the venerable Chief Judge? The venerable Chief Judge. Are you calling him old? No.

Oral argument — Tippins v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2024

And the Secretary has acted within that discretion. And I don't know if that's a dispute or not. Your honor, I couldn't agree more. … The Webster's New International act of dismissing a person from the government employment for reasons of economy.

Oral argument — American Gov''t Props. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2015

Well, isn't a merger a voluntary act? … And then you have this very rhetorical comment about as two appellants are harassing the government, yada, yada, yada.

Oral argument — QINGDAO TAIFA v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2012

And then at verification, you can see how TIFA acted. They lied again. They ended up ripping up documents. They ended up also putting documents in their pocket. … Yeah, but they can't pull a rate out of the air. I mean, they have to establish it somehow.

Oral argument — Ekinciler Demir v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2009

Because what we're talking about is the cost of production for this period over the year, this period of time, 2004-2005. … I don't want to interrupt, but you're saying over the period of review should have been depreciated over some other period?

Oral argument — Clark v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2007

The response to that is in the Federal Benefit Act of 1996 when Congress adjusted the terms of service for purposes of herbicide exposure, Congress specifically limited the time period from January 1962 … Clark is hanging his case on is this language in the implementing – Federal Register citation implementing the regulation, which says, oh, and by the way, during the notice and comment period, we received

Oral argument — Sinorgchem v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2007

you do exactly the same test, deriving a different example, you would end up with a nitrobenzene conversion that is fundamentally different than the 12% to 63% that the Commission snatched out of the air … Because the truth is, nobody ever thought conversion of nitrobenzene was relevant to anything until after the commission acted.

Oral argument — +Edwards v. Justice

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2006

So the litigation issue was in the air. … It was within a short time period of him beginning work in that position.

Oral argument — Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2016

Under the Indian Companies Act of 1956, they don't have to publicly disclose their income statement in the Ministry of Corporate Affairs public records. … The trial court did comment that even if it wasn't publicly available in an objective standard, the court found that the purpose of the regulation to give parties the opportunity to comment and analyze