Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.41s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Marek v. Chesny
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
Ct. 3274 (1983) .... 31 Clayton Antitrust Act, 15 SS. Ge § 72 eeee<eee74us8ee#e#ee#es 17 j , 435 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. … These statutes include, inter alia: the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k); the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(f£); the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, 42 U.S.C.(Supp.
473 U.S. 1Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Section 202(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act gives EPA the authority to control emissions from motor vehicles, one of the most significant sources of greenhouse gases. … In “declining” to adopt standards under section 202(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act for motor vehicle emissions of greenhouse gases, EPA ignored these hazards.
549 U.S. 497Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. City of New York
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
. ¢ Prior to the Harsha Amendments, § 207 unequivocally authorized a total of $18 billion for the three year period ending on June 30, 1975. … The Congress clearly intended to provide the authorized funds at an early time in the period required for c mnpliance.
420 U.S. 35Amicus Curiae Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
These two unprecedented Clean Water Act rulings are a radical departure from past administrative and judicial interpretations of the Act. … of this Court’s construction of the Clean Water Act in International Paper Co. v.
503 U.S. 91Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026
The federal common law as it existed before the Clean Air Act would have preempted the state tort claims in this case. … AEP did not hold that the Clean Air Act revived the state causes of action that earlier federal law had preempted.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 14, 2022
Rep. 10190 (2006) ..................................................... 14, 15 Damien Schiff, Keeping the Clean Water Act Cooperatertively Federal—Or, Why the Clean Water Act Does Not Directly Regulate … Rev. 923, 925 (1999); see also Damien Schiff, Keeping the Clean Water Act Cooperatertively Federal—Or, Why the Clean Water Act Does Not Directly Regulate Groundwater Pollution, 42 Wm. & Mary Envtl.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 4, 2020
Like the Clean Air Act in then-judge Kavanaugh’s decision, the INA precludes systemic review and channels it to the federal courts in the District of Columbia Circuit. … As with the Clean Air Act, the INA requires that all challenges to systemic INA rules be brought in the District of Columbia, 8 U.S.C. § 1252(e)(3)(A), within 60 days of a rule’s promulgation.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Sunoco LP, et al., Petitioners v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2024
The Clean Air Act recognizes “the primary responsibility” of States to prevent and control “air pollution … at its source.” 42 U.S.C. §7401(a)(3). … Air Act and Clean Water Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Dow Chemical Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Air Act. 42 U.S.C. § 7401 (1983). … Furthermore, ob- taining judicial oversight will not frustrate EPA’s en- forcement of the Clean Air Act.
476 U.S. 227Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of the Interior v. South Dakota
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
Welfare Act of 1968 os cnsncasncosacoen 6 Indian Tribal Justice Act 25 U.S.C. 3601, 3602, 3611, 3612, 3613, 3614, 3621, ERAS OEE AES TRS A Cn EN 6 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1991 ee senipaneninesenaietebennboneis … , 25 U.S.C. 450f (1995) (amending the Indian Self Determination Act to provide devolution of federal program responsibilities and federal funding to several tribal governments); Clean Air Act Amendments
519 U.S. 919Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026
Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. … “[I]t’s clear that too many lawmakers have abdicated, thus the pressure to tackle the climate issue through existing regulations like the Clean Air Act, and through the courts.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 24, 2023
Ct. 2172, 2176-2181 (2021) (examining meaning of the term “extension” in provision of Clean Air Act allowing small refineries to petition EPA for extension of hardship exemption from renewable fuel program … Circuit deferred to EPA’s refusal to consider the costs of a Clean Air Act emissions regulation that was statutorily required to be “appropriate and necessary”), reversed, Michigan v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Atlantic Richfield Company, Petitioner v. Gregory A. Christian, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 22, 2019
Founded in 1973, the Montana Environmental Information Center is one of the state’s most established non-profits serving the conservation community, with a mission to ensure clean air and water for all … An award of restoration damages serves to ensure a clean and healthful environment.”). 15 Simply put, restoration damages are available to compensate plaintiffs for a variety of tortious acts under Montana
Amicus Curiae Brief — Carpenter v. Murphy, 139 S. Ct. 626 (2018) (No. 17-1107)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Rev. 1141, 1174 (1995) (explaining that many environmental statutes, including “the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, RCRA, and the Safe Drinking Water Act” allow for states to implement and administer … The Clean Air Act (“CAA”) similarly allows the EPA to “delegate[| to tribes the authority to regulate air quality in areas within the exterior boundaries of a reservation.” Arizona Pub. Serv. Co.
Amicus Curiae Brief — North Dakota, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 22, 2021
With this recently discovered power, EPA is now authorized to set regulations far out of the bounds set by Congress in the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), imposing tremendous expense and undue uncertainty on rural … Instead, “the Clean Air Act displaces federal common law” and “when Congress addresses a question . . . the need for such an unusual exercise of law-making by federal courts disappears.”
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 3, 2021
Cir. 2021) ...................... 5-9 Utility Air Regulatory Group v. … As to where, it stated that both air pollution prevention and air pollution control should take place specifically “at its source”: The Congress finds— … (3) that air pollution prevention (that is, the
Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Senator Muskie at that time was Chairman of the Senate Subcom- mittee on Air and Water Pollution, which reported out the Senate version of the Act. … Senator Muskie asked the Senate the following crucial questions regarding the high costs of attain- ing clean water and then gave the following answers: Can we afford clean water?
420 U.S. 136Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
The Notices of Intent to Sue inform industry members that they are in violation of the Clean Water Act and have 60 days to comply. … Therefore, the Association has a direct interest in this case that puts at issue the scope of citizen suits under the Clean Water Act.
528 U.S. 167Amicus Curiae Brief — CropLife America v. Baykeeper
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
Baykeeper, No. 09-547. 4 Clean Water Act,” EPA Mot. for Stay of Mandate at 9 (reproduced at Pet. App. 122a). … deposition (although they are al- ready subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act), for the dispensing of road salt, for the application of domestic fertilizers, and for the use of many other
559 U.S. 936Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 16, 2025
Air Act (“CAA”) and the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and its state counterparts—including the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (“TCEQ”). … See Abell, Ignoring the Trees for the Forests: How the Citizen Suit Provision of the Clean Water Act Violates the Constitution’s Separation of Powers Principle, 81 VA. L. REV. 1957, 1964 (1995).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.