Documents

Oral argument — Pure EarthIncv.Calletal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2014

Because aren't we talking here about an intervening period of years? … You want to comment on those? Yes, I would like to comment on those.

Oral argument — NCAA v. Governor NJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2015

Well, there is no license under the 2014 act, and there is no authorization under the 2014 act. Neither are there. … Could Congress have simply banned all sports betting, period? Congress could have done that. Without enumerating six different activities that the state could not engage in.

Oral argument — Hagans v. Commissionerof Social Security

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2011

of the Act. … Well, I just wanted to point out that you did mention that the plain language of the act does require that a claimant file a new application for a subsequent period of disability when a period of disability

Oral argument — Commonwealth of PA v. President United States of America

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2019

Again, the way you deal with that is to make sure that we do valid notice and comment on the second step, which we did. We went through the notice and comment period. We considered their comments. … It says, the general rule that frowns upon post-propagation comment periods reflects the concerns that underlie Section 553.

Oral argument — Wilkerson v. New Media Tech

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Where do you get that she was hired for a specific period of time? Because the document I read refers only to the period of time during which she would be paid. … Now, obviously, a Sherman Act case against Bell Atlantic represents an enormous burden. We're talking about discovery.

Oral argument — Szafermanv.Westport Ins Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 18, 2012

If you take away one theme from my comments this morning, Your Honor, I'd like it to be this, that when Mr. … And under the interrelated wrongful acts provision, related acts arising out of the same services, the same wrongful acts or series of wrongful acts, relate back to the date on which the first such claim

Oral argument — United States v. Walker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2011

Yeah, the challenge to the robbery count, of course, is the interstate commerce aspect of the Hobbs Act because the Hobbs Act's the jurisdictional predicate to it. Yeah, that's your claim on that. … This was an open-air market where crack cocaine is trafficked. That was closed down by police and investigation, which essentially shut that market down for a period of time.

Oral argument — United States v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2018

So that period, we feel, I know the statute indicates that that period is presumptively held against the government. … I think that's what the purpose of this 10-day period was, to say to the marshal's service, we aren't condoning that. Once you receive an order, you must act immediately to get this done.

Oral argument — CeasarsEntertainmentCorpv.InternationalUnionofOperating Engineers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2019

So they're going to suffer a penalty under the Multi-Employer Act, even though they're paying 100 cents on the dollar. They're going to have to pay a legal penalty. … The last comment is good. OK, my last comment is this. If if the facts of this case don't apply to subsection I, very unique, unique facts. I can't think of a case.

Oral argument — Melberv.USAetal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2013

That's still beyond the period of time he could have filed the period from which he could file a tort claims claim. I disagree, Your Honor. Well, if it wasn't actually arose, let's say when Dr. … After commenting on Egan v.

Oral argument — Lacombe v. Warden James Vaughn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2023

And it's as if he's as culpable as the person who did those acts. And the law provides that, of course, you know, it's felony murder and conspiracy and so forth. … If they made some additional comment, I think indicating that they weren't standing by the 22 years. But the comment was made that don't be full comment was made.

Oral argument — Cagno v. Admin NJ State Prison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2015

It was an over-act. Well, it was an... I'm sorry, the over-act need not be proven... it's not necessary for the state to produce, you know, to prove the over-act. … First point, of course, is that the state failed to prove that the conspiracy continued into the statute of limitations, period.

Oral argument — Holk v. Snapple Beverage Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 29, 2009

And that's very significant that the FDA made that decision after a period of comment, after a period of review, to take everything under consideration and say, we are not at a point where we can regulate … It was issued after four years of notice and comment. That comment period opened in 1989. You find that in the 1991 Federal Register.

Oral argument — G.L. v. Ligonier Valley School

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 19, 2014

Well, you're supposed to look at the clear structure of the act, and it's my opinion and position that the two provisions are similar. They act together and refer to the same two-year time period. … They referred to the two periods as being the same two-year period, that they wrote the regulations and commented to questions on that, and they have yet to have this issue brought forward to them from

Oral argument — Sathanthrasa v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2020

Comment period closes – January 21st, Your Honor. Right. But then organizations have asked for additional 30 days extension. So we don't know when it's going to be final, if it's going to be final. … The comment period doesn't end until a week from today, and different entities have asked for an additional 30 days to respond.

Oral argument — Guadalupe v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2019

And therefore he is entitled to have a new period of time. And at this point that new period of time is 14 years. That's right, this way. When did he go to Ecuador for four months? … Well, the Immigration and Nationalization Act, I think in some aspects perhaps the BIA is in better position to understand it.

Oral argument — Laniado v. Certified Credit&Collection Bureau

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2017

Your Honor, this is a rather straightforward claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the FDCPA. In this action, Ms. … I have not seen a case in the third circuit commenting either way on that, other than the Peterson decision, which states that there is no need to repeat those validation rights.

Oral argument — Gilliam v. US Dept Agriculture

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2021

The lack of notice and comment rulemaking. There's none here. … The first is by saying it refers to all food needs during the period of the pandemic.

Oral argument — Keith Slatowski v. SIG Sauer Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2025

This gun, for some period of time, was put back into circulation. … Now, if you get, let's say, a pen or something into a holstered trigger, that can go sort of at an angle, and the holster can act as a lever when that object pulls it.

Oral argument — United States v. Donte Taylor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2021

The person could have an air horn come into the court naked, running around, blowing that, and the court couldn't say, stop, you can no longer represent yourself. … Petropalo is making a good point that you acted prematurely. Don't act prematurely. Follow, go through, touch the bases so that you've given yourself a good record.