Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Muhammad

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2025

That period is entirely subsumed by the period of the drug case, according to the last indictment in the drug case. On geography, the court found that it spans multiple states. … And we defer to those, right, it's a clear air standard. And I would be the first in line to agree with that and say judge's ruling's normally okay, but here it's different.

Oral argument — United States v. Ritchey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2024

They were these air wildly different markets. … The PSR did— Going beyond, the writer of the PSR said he or she was using, during pandemic prices, you said it was just 60-day period, whatever that period was.

Oral argument — Encompass Off Solutions, Inc. v. Louisiana Hlth Sv

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2018

I mean, if I call somebody, you know, if an air conditioner fellow has done repairs at my house and I don't think the repairs are good, and then I try to call him two or three times and he doesn't answer … If the one-year prescriptive period runs from the date of the letter or three days later when Encompass knew of it, then that same prescriptive period equally applies to the defamation claim.

Oral argument — Banco Mercantil v. Paramo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2025

That if all of the legal acts that... Okay, so you're saying the previous decision, the 2024 decision by Judge Wilson, right? Correct, that's right. … Patamon agreed with the procedure that was followed, said my record is clean and the district court can rule.

Oral argument — United States v. Daniel Lomas, III

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2015

And if I don't, I've got plain air review. Well, but in this case, your honor, since 2008, these conditions kept being imposed. Mr. … But our interpretation of the condition is that the district court is ordering that he receive treatment, period.

Oral argument — Amer Petro Tankers v. Amer River Trans

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2022

But those errors under the Limitation Act and the prevailing law of the circuit should not deny APTX its entitlement to exoneration under the Act, or Crowley its entitlement to limitation. … console that could be pushed that was called cancel limits, that had the ability to cancel the limitations of the speed up and add an additional 10 percent, I think, boost as to torque and scavenger air

Oral argument — Julie Gleason v. Markel American Ins Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2019

I believe the Court has to address two issues, and if the Court agrees with the appellant, there's also a cross-appeal by Markel that I will address, of course, in my initial comments, if there are any … So the question becomes, is it — I want to bring everything to the district court's attention to clean everything up before it comes here, but in — in essence, we could have been here in the first instance

Oral argument — United States v. Chia Lee

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2020

And they said that the transporting of drugs or drug proceeds was an essential act, not an incidental act. … And overt act is only an overt act for purposes of this venue question. If it's an act done in furtherance of the object of the conspiracy.

Oral argument — BLET v. Union Pacific Railroad

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2021

Two third and two fourth allow the employees to select their union, period, end of story. … Jose Reyes was cleaning blood from his face and scalp and also removed a pebble from the parking lot from the back of his scalp.

Oral argument — State of Louisiana v. Biden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2022

They didn't just pluck a number out of thin air. No notice or comment or public input or anything like that? No. … To be clear, there was notice and comment in the first iteration of the working group. These numbers have been put out for notice and comment.

Oral argument — Transverse, L.L.C. v. Iowa Wireless Services, L.L.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2018

Or whatever lost profits we could prove for the two-year period, not the 12-year period, but the two-year period. … Under the case law, the air routing versus Britannia Airways case, Houston Court of Appeals case that we cited. If you deceive a plaintiff into paying for services that were never performed.

Oral argument — United States v. Dennis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2022

Once allowed in, the court should have permitted them when they acted with diligence as best they could in securing the discovery, getting motions filed, and seeking hearings. … Even putting aside whatever the review is plain air. Even putting aside the question of whether or not there's been prejudice because of the denial based on untimely filing.

Oral argument — Legendre v. Harrah's Casino

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2025

place of business in Nevada and you don't dispute that is that correct I don't have any information to dispute that no and we would just ask that you again we would ask that you find that the trial court aired … as I'm sure all three of us did and he looked left for what seemed to me to be an extended period of time if your head's on a swivel you're kind of looking like this and then in that open area people

Oral argument — Stewart v. Gruber

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2023

They acted like the scheduling order deadlines did not exist, did not apply to them. … And then it was amended and amended and amended, all within the discovery period.

Oral argument — Harward v. City of Austin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2023

So, you're saying annexation period is synonymous with tax, no matter who challenges an annexation and it's a tax case? … But what if you have a case that it's about annexation, period? I mean, that's what this case is about.

Oral argument — Moreau v. Harris County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2026

This case presents a straightforward application of the Fair Labor Standards Act's exemptions for executive and administrative employees. … They're not coming to the court with clean hands. And lastly, I'll say, I can conceive of a situation, to your point, where someone can be simultaneously exempt.

Oral argument — United States v. Thaddeus Beaulieu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2020

This wasn't your isolated prosecutorial error of the comment during closing, the improper question, or even multiple improper questions or comments. … How can this court not clean up this mess by ordering a new trial possibly before a different judge? Sure, your honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Nelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2024

The comments in the rules don't allow . . . the rules themselves don't discuss actual versus intended damage. It's the comment in the guidelines that . . . where we get the intended damage. … This Court has always enforced that comment. I contend that it could easily be interpreted a different way.

Oral argument — Estevis v. Cantu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2025

And there's a, the wheels are revving, the engine is revving, the wheels are spinning, there's a cloud of dust in the air. … And over a period of seven seconds, these officers had the opportunity to discern that.

Oral argument — Landry's v. Chubb

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2025

There'll be some period of delay. I don't mean bad faith delay, but some period where the district court is going through its process to reach its resolution of those issues. … The Louisiana Anti-Arbitration Act, which this court has said doesn't apply.