Documents

Oral argument — Joseph Construction Company v. The Board of Trustees of Governors State University

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2012

In this regard, as you know, or I think you know, you're writing on a rather clean slate. … The other thing, the final thing I guess I would say, although I know I've got a rebuttal period, is that I would ask this panel not to remand the case, not to remand this case just to allow the filing

Oral argument — People v. Verner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2026

Under the Speedy Trial Act, the court can grant the state additional time beyond the 120-day speedy trial period to get results from DNA testing, but only if the state shows that it exercised due diligence … His conclusion that he made the statement when also he's saying that they're just there to clean up this fitness issue again, Mr.

Oral argument — People v. Nowlan-McCue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2016

And that's why those comments were not erroneous. … And so those are my comments with respect to the second issue.

Oral argument — People v. Drake

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2025

At most, the defendant fired a gun in the air, not at anyone, but up in the air. That's the most that could be said about this. … Courts have routinely admitted evidence of acts of violence that are seven years old or older.

Oral argument — Village of Mundelin v. Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2013

But because when Bush arrived at the park, he didn't see the defendant, we know that this 5-15 minute period that he spent looking around for him was a period of time during which the defendant was already … There's no accident, but the police officer, acting on a hunch, follows the vehicle for a reasonable period of time, sees no other evidence of impairment, no other traffic violations.

Oral argument — People v. Hoskins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2025

This court had said that there's no definition of an odor-proof container within the Cannabis Regulation Act. … I think a fair amount of reliance is placed on that comment, your honor. Okay. And you said common sense, right? Yes, your honor. Okay.

Oral argument — City of Decatur v. Ballinger

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2013

Rosewell that at least for the Revenue Act's indemnity fund for bona fide purchasers in good faith of properties at tax sales, the contract purchaser is considered an owner under that act. … Just a couple of comments I wanted to make. Justice Turner, you had mentioned something about any cases directly on point, and I don't believe there are any directly on point.

Oral argument — Smith v. Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2011

I mean, if he's trying to fabricate something, he cleans up his history by that point. But, no, he goes in and tells the honest-to-God truth as he understands it. … We'll stand at recess for a short period.

Oral argument — Jones v. Sir Wash-A-Lot

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 20, 2010

Womack's comments that this case is exactly like Anderson v. Zemir because it is vastly different, and the facts that I've just pointed out are sufficient to distinguish this case from Zemir. … There's nothing else that shows any type of injury sufficient to cause that injury between the time period that we're talking about. All that's covered with his testimony. Thank you.

Oral argument — People v. McNulty

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2025

About three weeks later, the testimony was a little bit vague on the exact time period, she calls the law enforcement officer and says, I am now ready to make a statement. … Well, it does, Your Honor, because the whole point is you can't use specific act. I mean, specific act impeachment is prohibited in Illinois. That's the law.

Oral argument — Holly v. JRK Property Holding

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2018

His comment was, I thought – I thought that she would rescue her. … What is required under the Swimming Facilities Act, the Illinois Code, is that the pool needs to be cleaned from debris, that the area surrounding the pool should be clear from debris, the pool benches

Oral argument — People v. West

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2017

Wallace said that you can comment on credibility. Thank you. … Regarding, I mean regarding just a brief comment on the actual comments that were made as to credibility.

Oral argument — Shoup v. Nelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2016

We all know that once that ice is formed on the ground and it's 33 or 34 degrees out, it doesn't melt for an extended period of time, and plus it gets wet, it gets even more slippery. … When I make that comment, I point out the dubious nature of that testimony to begin with.

Oral argument — Blomenkamp v. Blomenkamp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2018

Now, my opponents argue that Wells Fargo is subject to a two-year limitation period in bringing its 24201 petition, and that it is required to make a showing of diligence. … She had no reason to believe that this mortgage still existed and acted accordingly at the Greg Blumenthal camp.

Oral argument — Shoup v. Gore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2014

You're telling us that we should not follow that holding, that we need a second act, an affirmative act, by your client under oath in order to have judicial stop or apply. … And so if he doesn't make a clean breast of it and disclose his assets, the creditors are shortchanged and the system doesn't function as it's supposed to.

Oral argument — People v. Atherton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2010

No, there was no actual specification that it must have occurred during a particular time period. … Again, your question saying does the apple float into the air, does that mean that there's no gravity?

Oral argument — Carter v. Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2014

Mayer points out, can result frequently in an air-trapping process. So it's obstructive in nature as opposed to restrictive. Exactly. … And the issue is the statute of limitations under the Occupational Disease Act. There's a general statute that says it's three years for everybody except for three separate cases.

Oral argument — People v. Bowman

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2012

You know, one of the things that you've responded to in your reply brief is the plain air issues that the state raised. … That's not a reckless act. That's a knowing act. But they rejected the idea that he was out there to kill her. He wasn't because attempt murder is specific.

Oral argument — Stackhouse v. Royce Realty

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2012

She knows they have a policy to clean up debris and so on. The tree gets cleaned up. I'm sure she noticed. You notice your surroundings when you're out walking your dog. … And isn't it a little bit remote with the two-year period there? Well, there is a remote two-year period, but we're talking about at the beginning when this in 2006 when this conversation took place.

Oral argument — Salcedo v. Johnson & Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2026

But going to the, that's not what we look at, that those comments are different than the cases. … Here, she lived through this period of time and they asked for it. So there's a big difference between the two cases. There is no case.