Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
5,846 results
1.22s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 17, 2000
These criteria were expressed in terms of an integrated air dose that could be received by an individual over a 24-hour period in excess of 10 rads, or radioactive contamination levels offsite at which … For example, one of the thresholds in Option 3 is that if the integrated air dose to an individual over any 24-hour period exceeds 10 rads, the Commission would find that “substantial releases” and “substantial
65 FR 61283Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Dec 21, 2004
In addition, the Commission may issue the amendment prior to the expiration of the 30-day comment period should circumstances change during the 30-day comment period such that failure to act in a timely … Should the Commission take action prior to the expiration of either the comment period or the notice period, it will publish in the Federal Register a notice of issuance.
69 FR 76486Nuclear Regulatory CommissionBiweekly NoticeFederal Register · Notice · Feb 21, 2023
In addition, the Commission may issue any of these amendments prior to the expiration of the 30-day comment period if circumstances change during the 30-day comment period such that failure to act in a … If the Commission takes action on any of these amendments prior to the expiration of either the comment period or the notice period, it will publish in the Federal Register a notice of issuance.
88 FR 10552Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · May 12, 2008
The drums were placed in the trenches in a two-foot layer with approximately 3-4 feet of clean cover consisting of compact soil. 4.4 Areas To Be Remediated As stated above, Mallinckrodt and USACE have … Mallinckrodt does not anticipate the need for effluent air monitoring since there will likely be no point sources of effluent air.
73 FR 27007Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Jul 30, 2013
The Commission has determined for these amendments that the application complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and … The March 29, 2013 supplement had no effect on the no significant hazards consideration determination, and no comments were received during the 60-day comment period.
78 FR 45987Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Jul 30, 2013
The Commission has determined for these amendments that the application complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and … The March 29, 2013 supplement had no effect on the no significant hazards consideration determination, and no comments were received during the 60-day comment period.
78 FR 45989Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Nov 30, 2007
STC-133 was issued on February 14, 1957, pursuant to 10 CFR part 40, and has been amended periodically since that time. … The State agreed with the conclusions of the EA and otherwise had no comments. III. Finding of No Significant Impact The NRC staff has prepared this EA in support of the proposed action.
72 FR 67761Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Jun 22, 2007
STC-133 was issued on February 14, 1957, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 40, and has been amended periodically since that time. … The State agreed with the conclusions of the Environmental Assessment and otherwise had no comments. III.
72 FR 34486Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Jun 9, 1995
(b)(ii) of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, requires licensees to perform an overall air lock leak test at Pa at the end of periods during which the air lock has been opened when containment integrity was not … The State official had no comments.
60 FR 30611Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Nov 30, 2010
In addition, the Commission may issue the amendment prior to the expiration of the 30-day comment period should circumstances change during the 30-day comment period such that failure to act in a timely … Should the Commission take action prior to the expiration of either the comment period or the notice period, it will publish in the Federal Register a notice of issuance.
75 FR 74091Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Feb 23, 2000
provision of section 189 of the Act. … However, should circumstances change during the notice period such that failure to act in a timely way would result, for example, in derating or shutdown of the facility, the Commission may issue the license
65 FR 9000Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Jan 8, 2008
The main office and Central Processing Plant complex is located at Smith Ranch, about 17 air miles (22 road miles) (27 air/35 road kilometers (km)) northeast of Glenrock, Wyoming, and 23 air miles (25 … These consultations were intended to afford these agencies the opportunity to comment on the proposed action, and to ensure that the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
73 FR 1367Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Jul 9, 2002
Under accident conditions, higher concentrations of materials could be released to the environment over a short period of time. … The comments may be provided to Micheal Lesar, Chief, Rules Review and Directives Branch, Division of Administration Services, Office of Administration, U.S.
67 FR 45555Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Dec 9, 1998
If no petition is received within the designated 15-day period, the Director will issue the final amendment to the Certificate of Compliance without further delay. … If a petition for review is received, the decision on the amendment application will become final in 60 days, unless the Commission grants the petition for review or otherwise acts within 60 days after
63 FR 67941Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Aug 29, 2001
The State official had no comments. … Tam, Acting Chief, Section 1, Project Directorate, Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
66 FR 45704Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Dec 17, 1997
That time period is allowed without regard to the magnitude of the potential leakage, and would be allowed even if both personnel air lock doors [were] leaking excessively. … Eaton, Acting Director.
62 FR 66133Nuclear Regulatory CommissionPolicy Statement on Mandatory Hearings for Reactor Licensing
Federal Register · Notice · Jun 8, 2026
The Accelerating Deployment of Versatile, Advanced Nuclear for Clean Energy Act of 2024 (ADVANCE Act), which was signed into law in July 2024, establishes requirements to enhance the NRC's timeliness and … The NRC staff will provide a comment period of up to three hours, where questions and comments from the public will be heard on the record.
91 FR 34661Nuclear Regulatory CommissionUnited States Department of the Interior, United States Geological Survey TRIGA Research Reactor
Federal Register · Notice · Jun 14, 2016
R-113 to allow continued operation of the GSTR for a period of 20 years and concludes there is reasonable assurance that the GSTR will continue to operate safely for the additional period of time. … Species Act (ESA), Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA), National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA), and Executive Order 12898—Environmental Justice.
81 FR 38739Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Sep 20, 2001
In accordance with the February 8, 1996, staff position paper, the draft EA and finding of no significant impact is being published in the Federal Register with a 30-day public comment period. … DATES: The comment period expires October 22, 2001.
66 FR 48482Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Uncategorized Document · Dec 14, 1994
The public comment period expired November 29, 1993. … For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended; the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.