Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Heron

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

How about no objection at trial, no comment by the district judge, and the only comment by the district judge at all that might be seen contemporaneous is the nice job, guys, comment. … The government had to have shown that with some greater specificity that there was actually some non-public information in that relevant period on which he could have acted.

Oral argument — In Re Discovery Lab

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Those four words are drawn from the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. … In the period from the beginning of the class period in March of 2004, up until they advised people to form 483, the company is making a series of statements that say, in words or in substance, all steps

Oral argument — Smith v. Katz

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2016

In that time period, there were no deadlines. There was no new scheduling order. There was no, hey, parties, we're going to set a new trial here coming up soon. … I'll check my notes, but I thought that the trial judge had made a comment. It was a very negative comment about Ms. Taylor.

Oral argument — et_al._USA v. Hickson_et_al._Part_1

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2024

I mean, he went back and forth over a period of many days. So no, that's true. Would that make it intrinsic? … For that reason, we suggested plain air. Were it not plain air... From the point of view of the government, wants a fair result, obviously. Yeah.

Oral argument — In Re Boy Scouts of America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2022

So that's gonna go on for a long period of time. … And I think what happened, Judge Ambrose, I think you even mentioned that there may be something that this court can clean up in this case. And I think that's exactly right.

Oral argument — In Re Tribune Media Company,etal.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2018

Your Honor, if I could talk about that period, they're talking about an eight-year period here, from the discrimination to the appeal to the district court. … Without doubting for a second the kind of alleged comments and the deep offensiveness of the alleged comments that Mr.

Oral argument — Sheltonv.Bledsoe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2013

Fairly soon, but I thought the whole issue of exhaustion went only to the Federal Tort Claims Act, does not go to the class action in terms of the policy of the issue. Is that incorrect? … Take some of the air out of the balloon. Just relax a little bit. You're getting so... Wrapped up, sorry. Yeah, exactly. It's not a ball game. It's just there's halftime time out.

Oral argument — Lara v. Commissioner PA State Police

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 29, 2023

They're looking to 19th century commentators, including Thomas Cooley, one of the commentators we cite here, to figure out what they understood the scope of the right to be. … Because the second Militia Act, on which your colleague leans so heavily, indicates they were caring.

Oral argument — Reading v. North Hanover Township N J

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2024

If you've got an extended period of time and nothing happens, is it really the case that that's irrelevant? … Does Major Schilling's comments, does that touch, infect, color every other defendant in this case, that that suddenly becomes Superintendent Payne's comment, that that becomes Chief Duff's comment, that

Oral argument — Lauri Howe v. Robert C. Litwack

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2014

And those are things which were litigated, aired, and a statement was made by the state court judge on more than one occasion saying, No, he hasn't exceeded his authority. … Would that be limited to acting within the bounds of his official duties? Well, yes, I think it would.

Oral argument — In Re Bathand Kitchen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

We had a time period. We operated in that time period. When the case was in an interlocutory position, we thought we could go forward with the case, but we decided not to. Okay. What happens, though? … There was nothing for her to act on. So you can't, in a sense, have it both ways.

Oral argument — Fogle v. Sokol

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2019

And I guess I'm perhaps I'm being imprecise by saying to resolve in that question or that comment. … The Supreme Court in this circuit has acknowledged time and time again that these are fine lines. gray area in saying exactly when the prosecutor is acting as an advocate and when he's acting in an investigative

Oral argument — ABIM v. Salas Rushford

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2020

Copyright Act. … Let me just comment. I can appreciate why the American Board of Internal Medicine needs to keep the contents of its exams confidential since questions are reused.

Oral argument — United States v. Delle Donna

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 22, 2009

I understand that the three counts of political corruption, the two mail frauds as well as the Hobbs Act, go together. … There was a portion of the record that had to do with whether there was a hang period. There was a discussion of whether there was some kind of hang period.

Oral argument — Rojas v. Atty Gen USA Rehearing En Banc

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2013

In that case, it was the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which I'll just call the Prescription Drug Act, and the Federal Controlled Substances Act. … Put the shovel in the government's hand and clean it up? There's a couple things in that.

Oral argument — Hagans v. Commissionerof Social Security

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2011

of the Act. … Well, I just wanted to point out that you did mention that the plain language of the act does require that a claimant file a new application for a subsequent period of disability when a period of disability

Oral argument — United States v. Scott

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2016

So how can that period be a period that you ascribe any failure to follow your client's desire? Right. … So we have two comments passing over each other. If that's actually what happened, I don't think the test should be who got to the punch first.

Oral argument — United States v. Allergan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2018

What if we actually asked HHS to weigh in and say, during this time period, what was your understanding? And then let you guys comment on what they comment on. … Actually, the statement of issues refers to the false claims act. It doesn't refer to any state false claims act. But aren't they coextensive?

Oral argument — Wilkerson v. New Media Tech

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Where do you get that she was hired for a specific period of time? Because the document I read refers only to the period of time during which she would be paid. … Now, obviously, a Sherman Act case against Bell Atlantic represents an enormous burden. We're talking about discovery.

Oral argument — Lacombe v. Warden James Vaughn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2023

And it's as if he's as culpable as the person who did those acts. And the law provides that, of course, you know, it's felony murder and conspiracy and so forth. … If they made some additional comment, I think indicating that they weren't standing by the 22 years. But the comment was made that don't be full comment was made.