Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
949 results
0.14s
Oral argument — Margaret Byers v. Gordon Painter
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2025
So walk me through why you think the circumstances leading up to the shooting justified the officer acting at the time that he decided to act. Yes, Your Honor, of course. … Insofar as the comments that Mr.
44 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Gregory Bartko
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2013
Now, it's time for the Eastern District of North Carolina to clean up its act. You're playing fast and loose. Our job's not here to protect the government. It's to make sure that you and Mr. … You know, that just strains credulity, and let me tell you, I've been an appellate judge for twenty-eight years, and I have never made these kind of comments to a prosecutor, never.
40 min of audioOral argument — Randy Coley v. DIRECTV, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2018
You need to give it to them clean. That's what certification is about, and ask us a question of law. … This could go on and on for an untold period of time. So that's the basis for that motion, Your Honor. Unless the court has any further questions, I don't have anything further.
45 min of audioOral argument — First Data Merchant Services v. SecurityMetrics, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2016
One for false advertising under the Lanham Act, another for tortious interference under state common law, and the other two for violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act. … So, I read that as a comment about antitrust injury. That's the only comment I can find in the record of the summary judgment hearing. Didn't Mr.
44 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Sonny Mack
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2022
The only other bit that I would point out here is that just on the on the degree to which the judge explains his sentence, the government's opposition was predicated upon it being plain air. … In terms of the court's comments at the second and third sentencing hearings, at JA-98, the court came back on the record and said it understood that 120 months was the statutory max, that that became
28 min of audioOral argument — Reya Boyer-Liberto v. Fontainebleau Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2014
But from the evidence the court considered, these remarks were made over a period of what time? Two days. Two days. Yes, sir. … No, but if she acts upon... Your client has to be discriminated against by reason of her race. Correct. All right.
41 min of audioOral argument — Yvoune Petrie v. Virginia Board of Medicine
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2016
I'd have to differ with the last comments on state action immunity because, quite frankly, there is no active participation here. … The board just pulled that out of thin air and zapped her with it, and they did it because they could, because they're the ones that can rule on competitors, and that's what they did here.
41 min of audioOral argument — Estate of Katherine Monica Vickers v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2026
So is your argument then that there continued to be a confidential relationship during this time period when the daughter was basically calling to report what was going on with her mother? … We mentioned jurisdiction specifically in the reply, and then in our opening brief, we argued that it was air for the district court to go further beyond resolving the statute of limitations claim or the
38 min of audioOral argument — Chad Langford v. Hector Joyner
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2023
Was that the day that they didn't act fast? I mean, it seemed like to me they acted pretty fast the last day. Which day do you think that . . . … I think my superiors at the department would appreciate me refraining from comment on Bivens.
39 min of audioOral argument — U.S. Med Supplies, LLC v. Geri-Care Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2025
I don't have it in front of me and I will have it here in front of me to testify, to comment on when I get back for please. … I believe that's true with regard to the breach of contract and the Deceptive Trade Practice Act, we're pursuing those, as well as the fraud.
42 min of audioOral argument — Michael Drakeford v. Tuomey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2014
But the equitable damages award didn't come out of thin air. … So he was not asked to comment at all or give any thoughts as to whether he thought this process was proper? No, that's not quite right.
54 min of audioOral argument — Carla Clehm v. BAE Systems Ordinance Systems
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2019
There's no indication that someone mentioned in a stray comment that he may have been arrested. There's no comment that anything further happened that he actually got charged. … When somebody came forward, we acted very swiftly. But that's what happened.
44 min of audioOral argument — Ruben Palazzo v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2026
The Truth in Lending Act requires there to be periodic statements. And doesn't that go against you to some extent when you say statements are sent? … To, I think, Judge Winnan, you asked about the Truth in Lending Act requirement for periodic statements. I just want to be candid with the court.
42 min of audioOral argument — Jose Obando-Segura v. William Barr
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2020
And so, I mean, the problem I'm getting with is, you know, if we're on a clean slate, you have an argument. … And certainly there's some commentators that have said that, but do you agree with that?
45 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Mario Baker
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013
And, Your Honor, we would point to two cases from this court that were both decided during the same time period, U.S. v. Megenson and U.S. v. Majette. … I think that Your Honors aired the issues fairly well in the opening argument. Are you sure? How did you know? I'm not sure. I can't read your minds, Your Honors.
32 min of audioOral argument — Eliza Wille v. Jeremy Pelter
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2025
The Vacancies Act says that certain things cannot be ratified. … The point of it is to retroactively authorize a past act.
42 min of audioOral argument — Columbia Insurance Company v. Christopher Waymer
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2021
And at, at that point they should have been on hyper alert that they needed to act in a manner that served their duties to their insured in this situation. … And the only thing they had at the time was the air ambulance records and bills, and that was it.
45 min of audioOral argument — Calvin Barton v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2013
That's what the South Carolina Wage Payment Act says. And the South Carolina Wage Payment Act does not create any independent rights. … As soon as you get an interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement, the Act preempts the South Carolina Wage Payment Act.
53 min of audioOral argument — N. C. State Conference v. Patrick McCrory
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 21, 2016
What are your comments on that? … I mean, that is a relevant point, but it also goes to the knowledge with which the legislature was acting.
88 min of audioOral argument — Sharon Bryant v. Carolyn Colvin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2014
May it please the court, my name is David Mervis and I'm here on behalf of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. … There was one suicide, there were discussions, comments, suicidal comments in July of 2006, and that's during the period that the ALJ specifically noted. There are references to. The specifics.
46 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.