Documents

Oral argument — Carney v. Lincolnshire

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2018

He and his crew extinguished fires for periods of time as short as 15 minutes, as long as two and a half hours. … I just have a couple of comments. First of all, Mr.

Oral argument — People v. Hollis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2011

I say this is a matter of law because there's no authority to have just picked a figure out of thin air, which is essentially what the judge did. … The judge made a comment about, I'm sure this woman would not have sold her truck for $500 prior to this. You don't have any.

Oral argument — People v. Nelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2018

Sure, he was asking – So that anyone could walk in during those periods of time, right? Sure. … If the evidence is close on one element, that's when plain air and SEBI kick in. So we agree injuries were serious. We agree some other of these elements were met.

Oral argument — People v. Zolliercoffer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 23, 2016

You know, it's not the clean case of Stoffel. … If he had wanted to treat them as one, what he said was, oh, you know, we've got to clean up this other mess with the PCP.

Oral argument — Hamilton v. Hill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2015

So after the 7 years after a conviction of certain felonies, then you're eligible again if you're clean and haven't had any other problems. … There's a period where if somebody's shown that they've gotten their act together, you can use some discretion. They absolutely could have said that. You don't want anybody.

Oral argument — In re Estate of Ormond

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2016

The closing statement has been commented on here. … And this was not one comment, objections sustained and we're done with it. This was repeated, and this was a theme. This wasn't a straight comment.

Oral argument — In the Interest of: Rafeal E.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2014

There was nothing that the officer pointed to that would suggest that Rafael was acting, in any similar matter, to a narcotics dealer, a narcotics seller. He didn't seem to be a lookout. … And there was a comment in Smith that the court would ordinarily find a seizure where the defendant is told to stop and remove his hands from his pockets.

Oral argument — People v. Delaney

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 25, 2015

Um, by where you intend to commit an act against Person A. And then in trying to commit the act against Person A, you spontaneously commit the act against Person B. … It requires a lengthy period of deliberation.

Oral argument — People v. Gupta

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2024

It's a very short period of time. A juror could potentially... … Having, having cleaned up that procedural mess, um, the arguments presented by the state are fairly straightforward.

Oral argument — People v. King

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2024

They constitute separate acts and with separate objectives. Control of the vehicle was complete. And then there was the subsequent act of forcing the driver to remain in the vehicle. … But it was one continuous act. Do you agree with that? No, I think our argument is it constitutes separate acts in this case. So, because the objectives were different.

Oral argument — Wright v. Department of Children & Family Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2025

I would agree with that, Your Honor And does not the Administrative Procedure Act apply to this case? … It does, Your Honor And so how can the agency adopt rules allowing hearsay when the Administrative Procedure Act says that the rules of evidence will apply?

Oral argument — In re: S.G.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2010

The Juvenile Act, the Only Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, the Adoption Act, and the Probate Act. … But it would strike me as it's possible for a short period. The related child adoption question.

Oral argument — Garland v. Sybaris Clubs International

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2014

Other than his comments to, what was it, to McGinnis. … They comment about nighttime, and they comment that he got too slow, he was too close to the runway, and he made a misjudgment as to where he was.

Oral argument — People v. Horn

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2021

And then they're both driving the car within a three-hour period on the interstate. And that's a little different than if Brown were the registered owner. … Well, at that point, the conflicting stories went to the free air sniff. So the value of that was basically that, okay, we have these conflicting stories. Let's go ahead and do a free air sniff now.

Oral argument — Keno and Company v. Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2011

And there's ample evidence by his actions and his refusal to act that he was on a path to not only work a part-time job so that he could qualify for and get Social Security disability benefits and start … There's, I think, a house cleaner, some kind of a housekeeping or cleaning type job, security, or a delivery driver.

Oral argument — In re: James H.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2010

And so we must safeguard this procedure and ensure that it is not abused and that people that are incarcerated or held against their will in these institutions for a period of time are done so for the … reasons stated in the act.

Oral argument — People v. Peters

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2024

And as it relates to the final argument, one act, one crime, there was three offenses he was convicted of. You believe it only applies to the one? Yes, Your Honor. … That is as clean cut of invited error doctrine as you can have. Regardless of whether he was misadmonished before, the state did its duty. It attempted to cure this error.

Oral argument — People v. Merritt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 20, 2017

I think still taking the court's comments in total show that the court was focused on deterrence and may have tried. . . In the motion to reconsider, it was trying to clean up a mistake. … is a threat, you know, and that the finding that it's likely to recur shows that the people do have to be protected from this person who has done this incredible amount of crimes within a very short period

Oral argument — People v. Popoca-Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2021

So, would you comment on how when there is forfeiture, based upon the failure to object to preserve the air to allow what you claim to be inadmissible evidence that is prejudicial. … I cited about five or six cases where the court reverse based on plain air and outside a few because I haven't my notes.

Oral argument — Buchanan v. Allied Energy, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2015

There was, indeed there was not, Your Honor And this was over a period of time? … court correctly excluded the testimony of Bruce Stewart as hearsay And based on it not being usable as impeachment testimony for a prior inconsistent statement All right As worth noting Even if this were aired