Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.30s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
As part of EPA’s reasoning, the Opinion emphasized that unlike a state implementation plan adopted under the Clean Air Act, which does become a federal standard when approved by EPA, a state water quality … disrupt the administration of the Clean Water Act.
503 U.S. 91Amicus Curiae Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Air Act, which does become a federal standard when approved by EPA, a state water quality standard is not approved by notice and comment rulemaking and is not directly enforceable.”* 12 United States … disrupt the administration of the Clean Water Act.
499 U.S. 946Amicus Curiae Brief — Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
Auth., A Ee ee 14, 15 RULES AND STATUTES Clean Water Act, A Seen eee 14 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 ch. 676, § 2, 52 Stat. 1060 (1938) ..............cccccccesseeeeceeeeees 16 Fair Labor … Nov. 4, 1986) (Clean Air case removing economic benefits of non-compliance); Chesapeake Bay Found. v. Gwaltney, 611 F. Supp. 1542, 1558 (E.D. Va. 1985) (same, under Clean Water Act).
535 U.S. 137Amicus Curiae Brief — Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Union Oil Co. of California
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Environmental Protection Agency, THE BENEFITS AND COSTS OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT, 1970T0 1990 ....6 U.S. … A typical clean-air environmental regulation which provides that only x grams per mile of nitrogen oxides (a precursor to smog formation), see, e.g., Clean Air Act § 202 Table G, 42 U.S.C. § 7521 Table
531 U.S. 1183Amicus Curiae Brief — United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Spurred by the need to respond to the periodic epidemics; aided by the emergence of vital statistics as a public health tool which demonstrated that dirt, congestion and bad air shortened lives; sensitized … In New York State, the Solid Waste Management Act of 1988 (1988 Act) established requirements for local government planning units to prepare long term (a minimum ten-year planning period) solid waste
550 U.S. 330Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 25, 2022
In Whitman, for example, the Court held that plain language of the Clean Air Act did not permit EPA to consider cost in setting ambient air quality standards. See 531 U.S. at 465. … Air Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — U.S. Army Corp of Eng'rs v. Hawkes Co., 136 S. Ct. 615 (2015) (No. 15-290)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Congress did not include any similar limitation in the Clean Water Act. … The Clean Water Act offers no “meaningful” review of Jurisdictional Determinations.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 26, 2018
The Court Below Disregarded the Plain Text of the Clean Air Act............................................... 17 A. … The Court Below Disregarded the Plain Text of the Clean Air Act.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 9, 2025
Under our federal structure and the Clean Air Act, state law may not impose liability for the global climate effects of emissions that originate all over the world. … health or welfare within the meaning of section 202 of the Clean Air Act.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 4, 2024
Before our barrel may be refined, the Clean Air Act imposes a mind-numbing array of standards and obligations on refineries. … The concept is uniquely apt in environmental law—and in particular, in the Clean Air Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — American Petroleum Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Minnesota
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 21, 2023
Because Congress displaced federal common law with the Clean Air Act, see Am. Elec. Power Co. v. … This case is not about the Clean Air Act’s preemptive scope.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
As an alternative, Congress provided Section 111 of the Clean Air Act. … Either EPA is an expert in the Clean Air Act or not. EPA cannot have it both ways.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Burlington v. Dague
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546 (1986) -.................... 5, 14, 17 Pennsylvania Vv. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 559-60 (1986) (“Delaware Valley I”) (fee-shifting provisions of the Clean Water Act). 5 See also S. Rep.
505 U.S. 557Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Another example of a statute that could be affected by the Ninth Circuit’s ruling is the federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”) (42 U.S.C. §§ 7401, et seq.). … ” ° To date, 16 Clean Air Act programs have been fully approved by EPA, and the remaining 34 state programs have been approved on an interim basis.
549 U.S. 1105Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n v. Defenders of Wildlife
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Another example of a statute that could be affected by the Ninth Circuit’s ruling is the federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”) (42 U.S.C. §§ 7401, et seg.). … ” * To date, 16 Clean Air Act programs have been fully approved by EPA, and the remaining 34 state programs have been approved on an interim basis.
551 U.S. 644Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026
Code § 21080.44(b)(1)(A) .................................................14 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q...............4, 22 U.S. Const. art. … The Clean Air Act’s war on smog stands as proof that environmental protection and economic opportunity for communities of color need not be in conflict.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 22, 2020
Clean Air Task Force & NAACP, Fumes Across the FenceLine 4 (Nov. 2017) (hereinafter, “Fumes Across the Fence-Line”). … In one recent study, the Clean Air Task Force and NAACP found that “[p]eople of color and low-income communities are disproportionately affected by exposure to air pollution” and that “African Americans
Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
Water Act, and erred when it mandated that EPA must regulate such runoff as industrial storm water subject to the Clean Water Act. … This would also allow EPA an opportunity to schedule public hearings during the comment period and for commenters to then be able to include information presented at those hearings in their comments
568 U.S. 1118Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026
Second, the lawsuit violates a clear federal directive—the Clean Air Act. “The [Clean Water] Act pre-empts state law to the extent that the state law is applied to an out-of-state point source.” … Thus “the only state suits that remain available” to provide redress for injuries allegedly caused by interstate emissions are “those specifically preserved by” the Clean Air Act.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 19, 2024
The Department’s defense of its truncated 30-day comment period also cannot be squared with the APA requirement that commenters be given a “meaningful opportunity” to comment. … Courts have not hesitated to invalidate agency actions where the comment periods were too short to provide such an opportunity. See id. (invalidating 28-day comment period); Nat’l Lifeline Ass’n v.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.