Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
1,016 results
0.12s
Oral argument — OFI Asset Management v. Cooper Tireand Rubber
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2016
You know, the plaintiffs act like it doesn't matter whether the thing that they should, that they say should have been said even was true or not. … That's something that was, uh, uh, up in the air. You had, you had problems and they were ongoing problems, but, uh, they thought we can get it done. We can get it done.
49 min of audioOral argument — Didon v. Castillo
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 23, 2016
Isn't that clear air to have found that, that there are no differences in light of those differences that I just pointed out? … And because the district court did something it could not do in that instance, it acted without subject matter jurisdiction.
35 min of audioOral argument — Charatz v. Avaya
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
McGuire after the class period. … And the discounts went up as the class period went on to 30-40%. And what does Mr. McGuire say after the class period? Oh yeah, I heard that noise in the first quarter.
48 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Penn
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2015
And, you know, not only that, like I said, she found the guns, the ammunition, the holster in the Air Jordan backpack. … This court has affirmed the admission of similar acts of conduct where the government has made a proper articulation. I believe the Lopez decision is one such case, and maybe Gavon was another one.
32 min of audioOral argument — Ross v. Gilhuly
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2014
So your position is that the lack of a statement by the supervisor outside of the PIP, in the establishment of the PIP, that that negative comment, the absence of any negative comment is itself evidence … Ross and others at Continental regarding what Ross was doing and what he was supposed to be doing and what he was failing to do throughout that entire period.
27 min of audioOral argument — Powell v. Weiss
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2014
So this is the holding, and then I just want you to comment on it. … So if you're not familiar with it, can I give you enough for you to comment?
39 min of audioOral argument — Jane Doe v. Heart Solution P C
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2018
There there is no reported authority that suggests And and especially in this circuit that suggested a statement has to have a perjury juror at associated with it rule 56 itself suggests although the comments … I'm not talking about all periods but at the end of that colloquy There's this very unambiguous question where she says yes for the unsupervised tests.
43 min of audioOral argument — In Re Thomas Dare Arbogast
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2013
In the state court, fraudulent transfer statute, the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, comment six, does talk about necessities. Right. And somehow Judge Wettick used the word luxuries instead. … Burden of proof, Your Honor, we agree with the finding that Judge Markovitz had with regard to his looking at Comment 6 of Section 5102 of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act.
74 min of audioOral argument — Stucke v. City of Philadelphia
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2016
And there's nothing before that in the time period of when Mr. Stuckey still had the job of acting assistant director. … Brooks was in the position of acting assistant director for three years. So this could have lasted, as far as he knew, for an indefinite period of time. And Mr.
38 min of audioOral argument — Longv.Atl City Pol
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2011
I represent the appellants Cyclechem and Clean Venture Inc. I would like to begin by addressing the court's letter of November 3rd. … I understand that 4A4 is a product of the Rules Enabling Act and the committee's actions, unlike 4A1 and other parts of Rule 4.
73 min of audioOral argument — Howard Stirk Holdigs LL C v. Federal Communication Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2016
For whatever reason, we're not going to make a change, period. … Congress's action can also be read to say they didn't like the two-year period. They wanted a much longer period. Well, clearly they didn't like the two years.
79 min of audioOral argument — In Re Community Bank of Northern V A
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2018
You had a comment in one of your briefs and it goes to the contract claim itself. I just wanted to ask you why why you folks said this. … As an example, I'm picking numbers out of the air. There's a $3 million fee claim. And they said, well, let's see the list of all the counsel that worked on it.
37 min of audioOral argument — Time Warner v. FCC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
Right, and absolutely we agree, and to the extent that the applicable question was up in the air and the FCC does indeed have a lot of expertise, there's no question. … The fact is, however, Earthlink went to the FCC during the entire 12-month transition period and explained to the FCC what in fact had occurred.
72 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Rogers
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2025
And I think they did that in other provisions in the Protect Act where they didn't say modify the commentary, modify the guideline itself. And so exact same act. … I'd like to, if I may, start by pushing back a little more on the plane air question.
61 min of audioOral argument — Three Keys Ltd v. SRUtility Holding Comp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2008
It has not been acted upon. Had Three Keys been a party to the case and the decision had been the same, of course you wouldn't be making the argument. … That was just like the orphan's court judge out of thin air said. No, Your Honor. The only evidence. . . No one else talked about? The only evidence that was submitted. . .
35 min of audioOral argument — Allen v. La Salle Bank NAetal
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2010
Period. Now, maybe there's no damages afterwards if you send it to a, if it turns out to be a knowledgeable person. And that's the facts in this case. … I was summarizing Judge Berry's comment. What did you mean when you said that?
38 min of audioOral argument — In Re Boy Scouts of America
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2022
So that's gonna go on for a long period of time. … And I think what happened, Judge Ambrose, I think you even mentioned that there may be something that this court can clean up in this case. And I think that's exactly right.
47 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Delle Donna
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 22, 2009
I understand that the three counts of political corruption, the two mail frauds as well as the Hobbs Act, go together. … There was a portion of the record that had to do with whether there was a hang period. There was a discussion of whether there was some kind of hang period.
33 min of audioOral argument — Sheltonv.Bledsoe
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2013
Fairly soon, but I thought the whole issue of exhaustion went only to the Federal Tort Claims Act, does not go to the class action in terms of the policy of the issue. Is that incorrect? … Take some of the air out of the balloon. Just relax a little bit. You're getting so... Wrapped up, sorry. Yeah, exactly. It's not a ball game. It's just there's halftime time out.
54 min of audioOral argument — Regional Employers v. Sidney Charles
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
How am I going to counter a statement of thin air where there's no record whatsoever? Number two, they're a fiduciary. They have an obligation to account. … We say he acted in accordance with the plan. Can you condition the right of the employees to get cash value on demanding a release which really is not valid under law?
40 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.