Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
949 results
0.17s
Oral argument — Brenda Robinson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2016
Your Honor, if we look to Utah and if we look to Aragon, which is the appellate court that has interpreted the Utah Products Liability Act, and we look to what that court relied upon, that court relied … upon North Coast Air Services v.
42 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Kenyada Jaqu
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2026
If it happens on separate days, it's suitable for predicates for the Armed Career Criminal Act. … That's something that's up in the air, and I'm not sure we would be doing much more than giving an advisory opinion in the abstract when we don't know what the issues are.
39 min of audioOral argument — Anita Baldwin v. DOWCP
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2026
Well, your honor, the act requires to be in and around a coal mining facility during that period of employment. … If we do so in this case, this is a regulation that was promulgated through formal notice and comment rulemaking.
45 min of audioOral argument — Maria Santos Mejia v. Jefferson Sessions III
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2018
I would respond in that the Immigration and Nationality Act provides that asylum seekers can be protected in both scenarios. Because it states that to win asylum they should demonstrate persecution. … For example, we noted in the brief and also the government commented that, for example, on page 65 of the administrative record, during a conversation with the judge, this topic came up earlier.
27 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Cristian Cabrera-Rivas
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2024
Cabrera-Rivas, and I apologize for my Spanish, and I am appointed under a Criminal Justice Act appointment. … He did not formally object to the order and did not do so within a 14-day period. Those, I think, those are facts we have to acknowledge.
39 min of audioOral argument — John Massey, Jr. v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2023
The argument that we were making is that, um, a sovereign immunity defense truly attacks the merits of the case and, and it will prevent the merits of the case from being aired in front of the court. … You've got that tolling period because it says without order that allows you to come back with it. So a couple of things, Your Honor.
34 min of audioOral argument — Hanwha Azdel, Inc. v. C&D Zodiac, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 26, 2015
Asdell's air light sheets were literally shipped to Crane for use in developing its product, 969-972. … They've been working on it for a long period of time. Let me speak really briefly. I've got almost no time left. I want to speak briefly about the confidentiality.
44 min of audioOral argument — United States v. James Harris
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2013
As this Court has previously articulated, the act— With respect to the Speedy Trial Act, I thought your argument was a Barker v. Wingo violation argument. … Judge Quarles mentioned the backup time issue at page 999 of the Joint Appendix, and it was in response, I believe, to a comment from Mr.
25 min of audioOral argument — Charles Bellon v. The PPG Employee Life and Other Benefits Plan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2022
that act. … And and that that act was a waiver of their of a contractual right. That was it.
59 min of audioOral argument — Kent Stahle v. CTS Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2015
Specifically, courts look to the title of the act, provisions in the act stating when the act is supposed to apply, and whether or not it creates an entirely new substantive rule of law or clarifies issues … The record probably did not pick up my air quotes when I indicated the word clarifying, and I was referencing solely the legislature's self-serving, if you will, designation of the amendment as clarifying
36 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Michael Rankins
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2016
Rankin said he wanted to go to trial even after the court made its comments at the December 5th hearing. … I'm sorry, the air pistol. But how did it come up that he had polio? Why would that even come up? Government counsel mentioned it. I know who mentioned it. How did it come up?
40 min of audioOral argument — John Doe v. Catholic Relief Services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2026
CRS does not, and I think part of the reason goes to some comments Judge Floyd made earlier about commerce. … He cleaned it up, he trained people how to use it, he didn't forward-face, he didn't interact with donors, he did none of those things.
55 min of audioOral argument — Sandra Gardner v. International Association of Machinists
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2025
So we're dealing with an almost three-year period in which before Gardner came to court. Now, when you look, we have to look at latches because 501 does not have its own statute of limitations. … It's one to demand action, and then if the action is inadequate, identify the inadequacy and demand that the union itself clean it up. And if they don't, go right to court.
48 min of audioOral argument — Thomas Porter v. Harold Clarke
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2017
how much longer after the suit that's been filed that they start to change well it depends on on what you mean by start the changes the department had been considering it and discussing it for for a period … had numerous discussions with my staff regarding whether and how those modifications should occur that's 100% of what we know I don't know if they're talking about better better water fountains better air
48 min of audioOral argument — Margaret Byers v. Gordon Painter
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2025
So walk me through why you think the circumstances leading up to the shooting justified the officer acting at the time that he decided to act. Yes, Your Honor, of course. … Insofar as the comments that Mr.
44 min of audioOral argument — First Data Merchant Services v. SecurityMetrics, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2016
One for false advertising under the Lanham Act, another for tortious interference under state common law, and the other two for violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act. … So, I read that as a comment about antitrust injury. That's the only comment I can find in the record of the summary judgment hearing. Didn't Mr.
44 min of audioOral argument — Steven Lincoln v. DOWCP
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2014
The employer chose that number out of thin air and applied it not just to this case, but to dozens of other cases, as we've shown you in the appendix. So what did the audiogram show? … Additionally, with your comment about this being a minor case, the Act does not differentiate between an arm injury for attorney's fees or a hearing loss case or a back injury or a permanent total disability
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Lucio Deleon-Ramirez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2013
haven't acted, but they didn't. … And then the judge could act on that. That's correct, Your Honor.
20 min of audioOral argument — Agape Motorcoach Retreat, LLC v. Glenda Brintle
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2013
to value the property as defined in the condemnation petition and is evaluated by the commissioners, both as to the take and as to the residue and damages thereto, then if the court performs another act … Burns Clean it up I Feel like there's so many questions and so little time If I may I'd like to address the the state Excuse me the private individuals the what we have termed the Boland easement and the
45 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jose Ordonez-Zometa
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2025
I have three basic comments. Which warrant are you talking about, all of them? All three of them, because my argument applies to all three. First of all, Your Honors, Mr. … It wasn't just how you characterized it, but I think he basically told him, I can comment on your silence. Yes. Legally incorrect, totally inappropriate.
40 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.