Documents

Oral argument — Gilbert Herrera v. Terry Dishon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2017

I will also admit that during the course of the six months of hearings on the fee application and the lengthy period afterward that this Court did issue its Warner opinion. … So the first short period of time, the final. Okay. Other than what was submitted that Judge Bowen was not satisfied with.

Oral argument — Sahara Health Care, Inc. v. Alex Azar, II, Secreta

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2019

The Affordable Care Act had nothing to do with Subsection F. Subsection F long predated the Affordable Care Act, and the Affordable Care Act made no changes to Subsection F. … Do you have any comments on Hawkins? The Hawkins case. I apologize, Your Honor, I'm not aware of that. Personal care products. That's the personal care. Oh, personal care products.

Oral argument — Miniex v. Houston Housing Authority

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 31, 2022

Repayment, and everything is stated clean. What she's providing is the indicia of False Claims Act violations. What's your best case? I'm interrupting just because you're good and time runs out. … Miniaks forwarded to herself in the, you know, six or seven month period before she was terminated in December of 2016.

Oral argument — OnPath Fed Crdt Un v. US Dept of Trea

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2022

Over a period of time, they received approximately $12 million in funds from the CDFI institution. … Do they just draw the short straw and get this audit, or is everybody typically audited over a period of time?

Oral argument — Simpson v. Moore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2024

One period is while there is a marriage. And the third period is after there has been a divorce and there is no longer a marriage. … That's any interest period in the policy.

Oral argument — Renasant Bank v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 3, 2018

It's never that clean. If what you're telling me is the employee comes in and admits to each and every point that you've just stated, maybe you're going to be hurt. … Well, it means acting with intent. It means acting to deceive with intent.

Oral argument — Taylor v. HD and Associates

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 24, 2022

I just read Judge Posner's opinion in Alvarado versus Corporate Cleaning Services. You're familiar with that case from the 7th Circuit about window washers? I am. … And I think that's where the comment about, if this was a regular interval time slotted 1 hour per sale, the outcome would have been different.

Oral argument — Taylor v. LeBlanc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2023

Your Honor, he is not strictly liable, period, right? We have to meet a very strict burden versus Thompson. There needs to be knowledge, and we showed knowledge. … It is very clean and very clear with regard to exactly what happened here. And again, those issues could have been easily addressed in the manual. And Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Chaney

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2024

There you were dealing with the issue of whether an air gun qualifies as a firearm under Texas law, and even though the defendant in Boston had been prosecuted for use of an air gun, the court said the … appellate court really didn't decide as a matter of law that an air gun qualified as a firearm under Texas statute.

Oral argument — Resie's Chicken & Waffles Rest v. Acceptanc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2017

He testified that on page 1971 of the record that it's common for ethanol to be present where you've got a bar where there's beer and wine and cleaning supplies. … Just briefly, Your Honors, let me address the arson comments that were just made, even though I think they're very peripheral.

Oral argument — Cope v. Coleman County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2024

What we have here is is we have four people acting at the same time, all doing the same thing, all not calling 911. … Would it be a policy that 911 has to be called within a specific period of time? What's the constitutional minimum, in your view?

Oral argument — United States v. David Piper, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2018

And during that period of incarceration, as we understand the record, that's when this conversation with Castle occurred that Eli overheard. So it was in February, March. I guess so. … That is totally inconsistent with this notion of Piper being picked out of thin air. That's just a harmlessness argument.

Oral argument — Thomas Howell v. Town of Ball

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2016

by the FBI and actually paid money by the FBI to wear a wire to attend a town meeting where it was discovered that the town officials were committing FEMA fraud by putting numbers that they worked to clean … That's what footnote three says, that it has not acknowledged Cats bought in a False Claims Act case. Not False Claims Act. Yes, ma'am.

Oral argument — Dana Taliaferro v. Lone Star Impl & Elec Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2017

That is not an unlawful act. It is maybe a violation of a company policy. … Typically, well, typically you take the employee's, the company's own handbook and you gussy it, you know, you clean it up or you make it compliant with whatever state you're in and add federal law and

Oral argument — Ramsay Scarlett & Company v. DOWCP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2015

There's no doubt that there's an elephant worth of exposure under the State Act, and that the exposures are lesser under the Longshore Act. … Because one of the jobs that the employer had was to monitor the air, to monitor the employees periodically, to follow these regulations, to give the employees some safety information and training.

Oral argument — United States v. Slape

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2022

So if the trial court never acquired jurisdiction, period, as a matter of the indictment, then the trial court would never be able to grant a 48, 48A motion because it never acquired jurisdiction. … In our view, uh, they follow directly, um, because there doesn't need to be anything to wipe the slate clean, and I think, um, the, uh, the Macklin case, uh, establishes that principle, even if, I think

Oral argument — I. L. v. Houston Indep. Sch. Dist.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2019

She also, they had only one lunch period for the school, and so there was no way to segregate people during the lunch period. … And so they basically threw their hands up in the air and decided to sit this one out and leave it to the police.

Oral argument — State of LA v. Horseracing Integrity

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2022

Moreover, the 14-day period, of course, took account of the lengthy period of time that the authority provided with an iterative notice and comment period before it submitted the proposed rules to the … With respect to the comment period rule, we have not joined them.

Oral argument — Lockhart v. Repub Srv

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2021

Here, the district court aired an excluding evidence of slurs tolerated and used by Kenneth as circumstantial evidence of race discrimination. … I will say quickly with respect to the underlying Fair Labor Standards Act issue, and this is briefed extensively in our briefing, on the Fair Labor Standards Act issue, the, and following on the opinion

Oral argument — John Spells v. New Orleans City

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017

There were no further administrative remedies available because by the time our clients learned of it, all of the appeal periods had lapsed. … Well, the other point I was going to make in response to a comment that was made is what else the city could have done.