Documents

Oral argument — Vaszily v. Treasury

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2006

Absolutely no evidence whatsoever, none, connecting any of those acts to the husband. … With all due respect, I'm trying to figure out why, we were trying to figure out why he undertook these acts.

Oral argument — Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2020

The board wasn't acting as an advocate in any way. It was acting as a decision maker, just as courts do all the time. … I think we've already made arguments in our brief as to why the PTAB did not air, and I don't think they aired even if you apply Phillips.

Oral argument — TIANJIN MAGNESIUM INTL v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2012

That is a totally credible rate and it's really a gold standard in terms of AFA rates because it's a rate from only the prior year, very, very clean, unchallenged, never invalidated, never indicted. … I have only some brief comments on this. Acting to the best of one's ability.

Oral argument — JAMES LINICK v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2013

Let me comment about the first… Which we reviewed for clear error, correct? Oh, I understand that. … There's a debate about the 1997 through 2002 marketing period, and you said you didn't give any evidence of him showing that at that point he didn't have a secrecy order in place.

Oral argument — OCEAN INNOVATIONS v. GULF COAST

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2012

The patents in suit are not infringed by a mere sale of a float unit, as done by a dependent air and marine. … They have availed themselves of the privileges acting in Ohio by being directly involved in the promotion and sale of allegedly infringing docs to a number of purchasers in Ohio.

Oral argument — DGR ASSOCIATES v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2012

It was in the National Defense Authorization Act. It was not in the House version of the Act. … She would know because she represented her client at GAO, but she could talk to my counsel for the Air Force who is here today if she has any questions. All right, thank you.

Oral argument — FIRST ANNAPOLIS BANCORP v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2011

Air Force. And 201071381 v. DDA. The first argument will be on case number 20105032, FIRST ANNAPOLIS BANCORP v. United States. Mr. Dinser, are you ready? Yes, Your Honor. Thank you. … They would have a better argument if they had acted on or been required to act on the RCMDA, which they never did.

Oral argument — Clearlamp, LLC v. LKQ Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2015

The problem with this is – That's so trivially obvious as a way to put a coat back on or return it to the headlight after you've cleaned it. Your Honor, that's not what the evidence of this case is. … Regarding the merits of the case, I'm brought back to Judge Lori's comment that it's trivial to put spray on a headlamp. And the problem here is that's not the evidence of record.

Oral argument — ADMARK KOREA LIMITED v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2013

Americrea could have theoretically obtained declarations from those sources, could have contacted investigative services with the Air Force to conduct an investigation. … I sometimes forget that I have to comment. Let's talk about the implied contract. The implied and taxed contract. First thing, the government's lawyer kind of shot you in the heart, didn't she?

Oral argument — Dixon v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2016

Department of the Air Force, where an employee there who continued to perform a full range of her duties. … And then these couple other comments, I don't know this person.

Oral argument — Boechler v. Interior

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2010

Was this just a comment to some politicians passing through that too much money was being spent, which seems to me to be typical and ordinary? Or was it a more serious whistleblowing? … How much does the grand jury indictment wipe clean the charges Mr. Thompson is making about activities before the indictment? I'm not sure I understand, Your Honor. The charges of whistleblowing?

Oral argument — ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES v. BRIDGEPORT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2012

First of all, as you properly commented before, the willfulness case was very much segregated between infringement versus willfulness. … Yeah, and you had the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses, to bring on your own rebuttal witnesses, and to clean up the record.

Oral argument — Detrich v. Navy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2007

At the end of that 16 year period he was terminated based on a notice of proposed removal and ultimately a decision that alleged eight charges of misconduct. … You can find it in Chalice during your rebuttal period. All right. But the deciding official clearly said that, and I'll find that on my rebuttal.

Oral argument — Wyeth Holdings v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2010

In particular, Congress gave qualified patent owners the right to obtain a patent term extension equal to half the period of time spent during the testing of the new drug and during the entire period of … It's a cover letter, a table of contents, a summary, a copy of each complete letter, a complete facsimile labeling, the Freedom of Information Act summary, a complete identity of the applicant and what

Oral argument — Canadian Solar, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2018

And that Commerce would have a clean lane to be able to say, yes, these particular goods being assembled in China. China is the country of origin. … And they have both the obligation and the authority to do both of those things as long as they base it on substantial evidence and they don't act arbitrary and capriciously in the process.

Oral argument — In Re Macor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2018

You're saying that it was air for the examiner not to enter the amendments and consider the patentability of those claims? Absolutely, Your Honor. … And every single embodiment of DeFabio, every claim of DeFabio requires, as an element, that someone sign and it be videoed or imaged, period.

Oral argument — Honeywell International v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2009

Also, assuming the Secrecy Act, we were to agree with you on the Secrecy Act issue. Damages have already been tried on the case, but the court would then have to put the record down. … Honeywell's counsel made a comment that this was a life or death matter. The committee made a decision. The testimony is unequivocal.

Oral argument — Priceplay.com, Inc. v. AOL Advertising, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2016

And the air of the trial court here was in two parts, two related parts. … There's a fixed period of time within which they have to ask to act. Yes. No, that's all right. It doesn't matter. We can find out. The decision not to institute came in May of 2015.

Oral argument — Augustine v. VA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2007

And so then we go a nice period of two years. … Do you know there's any explanation why it took from November of 01 to September of 03 for the board to finally clean this case up? I do not know because I submitted a request for a decision.

Oral argument — Huster v. j2 Cloud Services, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2017

Actual fraud is an act, okay? And I'm not talking an act versus an omission. … The only evidence in the record was silence for that long period of time. And what is silence in this case?