Documents

Oral argument — Cushing v. Greyhound Lines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2011

I think the answer to that, Justice Epstein, is that there is a huge difference between commenting and participating as a party and commenting as a bystander, and that was his role at that point. … The idea here is to have a clean case so we can proceed to trial.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Phillips

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2016

And I want to comment on... Is that dispositive under the case law? … Where's the air conditioning on? Who's providing them? Kathy's providing them.

Oral argument — Mulry v. Berrios

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2017

We have a direct relationship between the act of the individual and what is being sought to be recovered. … If there was no such statute, right now if let's say we have a new assessor comes in and says, okay, I'm going to clean this up.

Oral argument — Babczak v. Abbvie Corporation, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2026

It doesn't have anything to do with the stint at that time period. … And you know, you can't, you cannot take the eye out and clean it up and put it back in. What's there is there, and they can't do much about it.

Oral argument — People v. Ramsey

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2018

But for a period of time, maybe not the whole three years, but for a significant period of time, he has had a chance—it is a he— has had a chance to observe the defendant in court, see the changes, observe … Stanley testified – Between the air conditioner and the door, and the handle of the door is on the side by the air conditioner, so it opens right to where the tools are, right there. Sure.

Oral argument — In re: S.G.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2010

The Juvenile Act, the Only Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, the Adoption Act, and the Probate Act. … But it would strike me as it's possible for a short period. The related child adoption question.

Oral argument — People v. Nelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2018

Sure, he was asking – So that anyone could walk in during those periods of time, right? Sure. … If the evidence is close on one element, that's when plain air and SEBI kick in. So we agree injuries were serious. We agree some other of these elements were met.

Oral argument — Schmit v. Metcalf

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2016

Lombardi, the plaintiff was hired by the defendant to clean out a barn in which the defendant was keeping a llama. … I'd be curious to hear your comments about what Mr. Rayfield was talking about regarding your client's employer's direction that he not ring the doorbell. So I noted that as well.

Oral argument — People v. Brown

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013

But even after his testimony, there was quite a period of time between the time he took the gun away from ultimately the victim. Certainly. … It's the defendant's burden to prove a clear and obvious air, and then the two prongs of the plain air rule, the evidence was closely balanced, or the air was so fundamental that the defendant was denied

Oral argument — Ohms v. Stevens

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2013

I read the case to say the acts of misconduct, and I'm using that word as a generic, should occur afterwards. … This child, even the appellant agreed, is doing wonderful, wonderful, straight A, great grades, well-behaved, well-adjusted, comes to school, clean hygiene, no evidence.

Oral argument — People v. Barger

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2018

How does the tragic fact comment per se that this child in the photo looks like an 8-year-old? Based on what? … Well, and that goes to a comment you made earlier referring to the child as the victim.

Oral argument — Carney v. Lincolnshire

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2018

He and his crew extinguished fires for periods of time as short as 15 minutes, as long as two and a half hours. … I just have a couple of comments. First of all, Mr.

Oral argument — Hiatt v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2014

We're talking about issues, the broader issue of management or cleaning. … But that role that he had was not telling these folks how to run these machines and when to clean them and how to clean them or any of that.

Oral argument — Wheeler v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2012

I mean, she went to work, she acted as a foreman on a crew, she cleaned out demolition debris. This is all after the 19B. … Take a break for a short period.

Oral argument — Invenergy Nelson LLC v. Rock Falls Township High School District No. 301

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2020

There's no allegation that the district committed any act that Invenergy relied on that caused Invenergy to rely on this resolution. … and application of the statute that you couldn't, if he's already decided how the statute is going to work in his mind, it's not going to be a cleaning issue at that point.

Oral argument — Erwin v. Motorola

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2011

Wiracoon testified by affidavit that the documents relevant to these issues, the exposure documents, material safety data sheets, air quality testing, all of those were with the division and with the plants … But the defendant determined at its Schomburg headquarters to use known reproductively dangerous chemicals in its various clean rooms. And this conduct had been going on for decades.

Oral argument — People v. Nolen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2019

But that's an argument that the trial court aired by moving it to the second stage. And the Supreme Court says that ain't the issue for us. … He was given an opportunity to clean it up, to present it in an equitable fashion, and counsel couldn't do it. And I think that's where we are.

Oral argument — Gross v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2015

When the Commission went past the two issues of disablement and nation extent, it was acting without authority. In layman's language, everything else was decided. … Timeliness, the two year period of approving disablement, is Section 1N. It's not in the section on disablement.

Oral argument — Brettman v. Cook and Son, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 18, 2020

Vila was traveling in was 29 feet in the air, which is 3.4 feet too high. The one in the adjacent lane to his right was 32 feet in the air, also way too high. … So, I mean, he made several comments to indicate that he did not believe that Dr. Noyes' testimony was admissible because it was not factual.

Oral argument — Falen v. Illinois Department of Children and Family Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 20, 2014

He shows up to school every morning, happy, healthy, clean. Whenever the DCFS did go to the apartment, they said it was well-furnished, it was clean. … This isn't about how a 5-year-old would act. It's how a 5-year-old who knows his neighbors, who's at home asleep in his bed, would act.