Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
1,016 results
0.34s
Oral argument — M.G. v. A.I.Dupont Hospital
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 15, 2010
I could possibly make because I had gone through PLE and plastic bronchitis and was getting the answers I thought were terrific for me on the motion for summary judgment, and I wanted to make sure I cleaned … And you can't do an end run around the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act either by saying that, well, under NEWMED's plea agreement, it was admitted that the stent was adulterated.
47 min of audioOral argument — Envoy Technologies Inc v. Cubic Corp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2026
So what would make this cleaning sufficient to warrant the next step, which is responsibly an answer in discovery? … So, yes, there would be a case for the period of six years, but we're talking about- And it's six years for both breach of contract and copyright?
50 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jones
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2010
repetition of an instruction was air There are several cases which are cited in our briefing Which hold that the repetition of an instruction when it favors one side more than the other? … Was there any Evidence that warranted evidence suggesting Racial animus That warranted comment other than the alleged falsity of the explanation No, not at all As I said, there wasn't even a prima facie
35 min of audioOral argument — A.S.Miller v. Smithkline Beecham
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2014
Case after case says you can have relation back as long, even if the pleading, the complaint has been dismissed, it's been acted upon, has disappeared into thin air, as long as a case is pending somewhere … It was a Wage and Hour Act type case.
31 min of audioOral argument — Gentile v. SEC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2020
Gentile has also had comments. I guess I don't understand the lack of urgency here. … We talked a little about Tucker Act or Federal Tort Claims Act.
44 min of audioOral argument — Wilmac v. The Honorable Micheal OLeavitt
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
I have to just make a comment. I've been on this court for 29 years, and it's such a pleasure to me to see women lawyers arguing before the court, finally in great numbers. … The same thing was in play in the Truth in Lending Act case, Ramadan. That case also involved a statute that has the title jurisdiction. That case was found to have a limitations period.
32 min of audioOral argument — Germinaro v. Fidelity National
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2018
May it please the court, I'd like to limit my comments this morning as I've been answering your questions to one point. … And in the RICO case statement, very specifically, the plaintiff is asked to identify the pattern of racketeering and identifies only predicate acts within a nine-and-a-half-month period.
36 min of audioOral argument — Landsman&Funk PCv.Skinder Strauss Assoc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2010
That's the third time period, correct? That's the third time period. That's correct, Your Honor. Then how do you pass muster for the first two time periods? Okay. … The first two time periods, the existing business relationship issue did not, exemption did not apply to the first time period, and numerous courts have said so.
57 min of audioOral argument — Interactive Media v. Atty Gen
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2009
in that statute that was there at issue from trying to make it extraterritorial, because the court explained that the reach of the Internet and the lawful capacity to regulate it was really up in the air … Period. And the better says that's fine with me. I'd like to place a bet in Costa Rica. And where we are, Judge, there's no doubt—it's not a question of proof. I know if I go online.
37 min of audioOral argument — Qin v. Vertex Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2024
Harder, and they were all subject to the same 2018 performance evaluation period. … Hart was discriminatory or actually acting on stereotypes at the time that he made the comments, but that actually he was able to tell HR the reasons why he felt that Mr.
74 min of audioOral argument — Emerald Coal Resources v. Ronald M.Hoy
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 26, 2015
First of all, the inspections on September 22, 2011, under the 103G, weren't about the time period that Hoy and Franks said the violations occurred. … They acted how Congress and the Mine Act would expect them to act.
58 min of audioOral argument — Kengerski v. County of Allegheny
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2020
receiving the text messages, which continued for a period of time. … There's no basis for disaggregating one act versus other ongoing acts that the individual reported all at once, tethering it all to a single course of harassing discriminatory conduct.
72 min of audioOral argument — 19-2270_USA v. CES
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2020
One includes the comment made by the court that you just referenced, but I'd like to just follow up on something Judge Jordan was asking you. … Sorensen was saying, comments that were made at the final supervisor release and disposition proceeding where the court made certain comments about this individual's intent.
38 min of audioOral argument — Eurofins Pharma USHoldingsvs.Bioalliance Pharma SA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 15, 2010
To a certain degree, this panel is writing on a clean slate on this one particular issue. … It would be the act in Delaware.
51 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Yaroslav Churuk
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2019
There were, I believe, two or three... actually, I believe four acts that were alleged in the indictment that would suggest that a continuation of the conspiracy into the limitations period. … There's 79 overt acts alleged in the conspiracy, five of which are alleged to have occurred after March of 2005, the limitation period. Four of those derived from Nadia Yashuk, four.
53 min of audioOral argument — Oziegbe Amiegbe v. Attorney General USA
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 28, 2026
I hear Riley to say, okay, this is mandatory claims processing rule with regards to this is how you have to act. And this is the time period that you have to act. … They are purely challenges to the cat clean the court must be in review must be judicially examining an order in order to be reviewing that.
47 min of audioOral argument — City of Warren v. Prudential Financial
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2021
But first of all, for example, on June 5th, defendant Tangi doesn't comment on reserves. He doesn't comment on assumptions. He comments on mortality. … It's not our position to tell the company how it should have acted. The point is that it did neither of those things.
62 min of audioOral argument — Islam v. Atty Gen USA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2025
It enumerates specific acts, and we argue that sexual contact is not something that is among those acts. It's merely an embedded definition. … But the Supreme Court was pretty clear that courts are not riding on a clean slate.
54 min of audioOral argument — Theresa M. Ellis Vs. Ethicon Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 25, 2013
It just can't grab it out of thin air. … What she does, and this is an important thing, she acts like this is some great thing, is she offers her a part-time job.
34 min of audioOral argument — OFI Asset Management v. Cooper Tireand Rubber
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2016
You know, the plaintiffs act like it doesn't matter whether the thing that they should, that they say should have been said even was true or not. … That's something that was, uh, uh, up in the air. You had, you had problems and they were ongoing problems, but, uh, they thought we can get it done. We can get it done.
49 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.