Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
949 results
0.09s
Oral argument — United States v. Jessie Glass, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2025
Seems to be clean. Judge Bell found no that recklessness requires Lawrence be actually aware that the risk would materialize. And that is not the standard for recklessness. … Because a magistrate would say, my gosh, we've had these different investigations of this over a period of years where there's smoke, there must be fire.
46 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Under Seal
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2015
But is the judge supposed to pick a sentence out of the air? Isn't that a separation of powers kind of a problem? Your Honor, I don't believe at all that the judge picks a sentence out of the air. … But, Your Honor, I think the court can look to congressional intent by looking both at the Juvenile Delinquency Act, the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act.
52 min of audioOral argument — Qinetiq US Holdings, Inc. v. Commissioner of IRS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2016
Because in response to just Kenan's question, you made a comment about, which I assume you're saying it's a limitation on the scope of the notice. … This would be a clean decision that you're out from under it completely. Well, I think the parties would fight over that. Well, I'm sure they would. But, Donald, what's your position?
44 min of audioOral argument — UBS Financial Services, Inc. v. Gary T. Padussis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2016
One is that the arbitration award should be set aside because it violates Section 5 of the Federal Arbitration Act. … Also, I think as a whole, UBS doesn't have clean hands. They basically sued a man that they knew couldn't pay back, and that's discussed at length.
45 min of audioOral argument — Chris Hill v. Certex USA, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2023
That's the Griffin Electronic Consultants case and the Raytheon Air case. … And the Raytheon Air case, there were multiple documents to consider.
47 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Alan Barnett
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2016
Barnett was identifying and associating, and the whole purpose of the conversation was to provide support for these non-UBN set members in terms of the activities that were taking place on the air. … There were text messages to Kimmy Cook, who was Gangsta Woo in Virginia, 142 within a five-month period of time. In other words, she is deeply enmeshed in the details.
44 min of audioOral argument — Jonathan Starbuck v. Williamsburg James City County
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2022
Correct and the court essentially said that because that they did not act no final policy making authority acted in that case the the plaintiff lost but had they chosen to intervene at that point they … i do not believe any way in the world this would have happened there's something about this student while this was taken to this level and maybe the record doesn't doesn't bring it out but it has an air
54 min of audioOral argument — Jane Doe v. Fairfax County School Board
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2021
And there's an act of harassment, a single identifiable act of harassment. The only way you can hold the school liable is agency. And Gebsner rejected that. … The first is that when a school receives a report alleging that the plaintiff was sexually harassed, it has actual knowledge, period.
44 min of audioOral argument — John Doe v. Wallace Loh
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2019
So if somebody acts in a way that the person that's acting believes is consensual, and he reasonably believes that she knows that it's him, then he's acting without intent to commit any offense. … You've commented on it. The investigation is complete. Now, there's an outcome conference.
56 min of audioOral argument — Lauren Graham v. C. Gagnon
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2016
Lauren Graham is standing at the door with a storm door on an air pump. She is asked to go get Colby, and she does. She lets go of the door, which closes. … Over at least a 15-minute period of time, she had an interaction with another officer at the side door. Mr.
41 min of audioOral argument — Marty Walsh v. Adam Vinoskey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2021
could be sued under ERISA for not acting in the best interest of the plan. … Now, that may be enough under a clear air standard review.
51 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Randle Cooke
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2014
It was not acted on. And more to the point, the Bureau of Prisons at no time sanctioned him for that conduct at FMC Rochester. … And it's kind of a truism that health is going to decline somewhat over a lengthy period of time. The key to this case and the district court's rejection, ultimately, of Dr.
34 min of audioOral argument — Timothy Austin v. Adrian Hoke
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2014
This was the comments at the original sentencing, I think. And the court goes, but I do think you should serve some time for it. … How does that then get twisted on another motion into us acting as if the judge is vindictive?
46 min of audioOral argument — Maria Santos Mejia v. Jefferson Sessions III
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2018
I would respond in that the Immigration and Nationality Act provides that asylum seekers can be protected in both scenarios. Because it states that to win asylum they should demonstrate persecution. … For example, we noted in the brief and also the government commented that, for example, on page 65 of the administrative record, during a conversation with the judge, this topic came up earlier.
27 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Robert Cisson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2022
And I appreciate that the government's comment, the government's argument has been that Mr. … It bothers me significantly that counsel can represent a client for such a long period of time and then file two days before an oral argument. That's just not good practice.
46 min of audioOral argument — Anas Elhady v. Charles Kable, IV
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2021
They will obviously choose the members to carry out an act who are not on the list rather than those who are. … You're going to take the Administrative Procedure Act, and there you would want a final agency action.
81 min of audioOral argument — Kristen Barnett v. INOVA Health Care Services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2024
They're just, period. They will not. This is not that case. The vaccine was not prohibited. So, because you, we know that the exemption, can you tell me why this gets even at this stage? … But it has to lead to why she can't do this act that an employer is requiring, doesn't it? Yeah.
39 min of audioOral argument — Jane Roe v. Marshall University Board of Governors
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2025
The bottom line is that in each of these cases, in every case that I've looked at in the course of reviewing this, substantial control requires some official authority or act. … This student had a clean record, had never been in trouble in the past, and was simply a one-off incident that occurred in this particular instance for which they had become aware of at that particular
42 min of audioOral argument — Dennis Fusaro v. Michael Cogan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2019
But our argument, and it's really important, that this segregation of the access and the content prongs are not as clear or not as clean as the court below meant to make it up. … Do you think Maryland could say there's a public square, if you will, and people periodically stand there and they speak their mind about politics or whatever they want to talk about?
38 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Abukar Beyle
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2015
And I can tell you this, and then you can comment on it, so I'll be a question. All right. … Which would provide an almost complete sanctuary for any kind of acts of piracy within 200 miles of the Somali coast?
48 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.