Documents

Oral argument — NicQuid v. FDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2026

And I think as you said, the FDA has unquestionably violated that requirement in the Tobacco Control Act, which requires notice and comment, and to give an opportunity for all stakeholders, including manufacturers … That's not regulated by the Tobacco Control Act because it doesn't have nicotine. And nicotine in it. Nicotine would be the product.

Oral argument — United States v. Raylin Richard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2018

no per se rule in this circuit that the victim, meaning the person who the child who's photographed or whose image is captured, has to sort of knowingly and affirmatively engage in any sort of sexual act … The last thing I'll mention is counsel made a comment about, well, we weren't sure which victim it was. The defendant would have received discovery by that time.

Oral argument — Perry v. H. J. Heinz Brands

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2021

Safe clean. Thank you, Your Honor. May it please the court. Mr. Perry had more than 10 years to make bona fide use of his matchup mark. … He produced receipts for 34 sales over a period of 10 years. None of them reflects a sale to a non-Louisiana resident.

Oral argument — Friels v. Warren

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2025

Additionally, with the bed sticking 18 feet up in the air, going 45 miles an hour, there should have been other signs that there was something wrong with the vehicle. He didn't detect those. … And summary judgment can be granted on those claims, and it acts as a bar to recovery. It acts as a bar to recovery if you cannot satisfy that essential element of reasonably anticipated use.

Oral argument — United States v. Jose Acevedo-Tolentino

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2019

And then, of course, under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act, if there was any loss approximately caused by this offense, the District Court had statutory authority to impose restitution. … Under the clean slate doctrine, if an individual complies with several sets of requirements, he can have the 15-year registration period reduced to ten years.

Oral argument — Gilbert Herrera v. Terry Dishon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2017

I will also admit that during the course of the six months of hearings on the fee application and the lengthy period afterward that this Court did issue its Warner opinion. … So the first short period of time, the final. Okay. Other than what was submitted that Judge Bowen was not satisfied with.

Oral argument — Crittindon v. LeBlanc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2021

You have the Clean Six Study, the 2012 classification study, and very significant findings, sweeping findings. … Stag was the deputy assistant secretary throughout this period. He oversaw the pre classifications of persons, etc., etc.

Oral argument — Spring Branch Indep Sch Dist v. O.W.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2019

So I think it would be not just a fact finding, Your Honor, that would be under the clear air standard. … I'd like to address some of the comments of my colleague and essentially three of the key pieces.

Oral argument — Deleese Allen v. Walmart Stores, L.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2018

She wrapped it around her waist, she used it to clean up. That, if anything, shows that there is no actual knowledge of misuse. … the wrongdoer are liable for the tortious act.

Oral argument — United States v. Nourian

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2026

In Thomas, the judge wanted him to come clean. … It wasn't the comment about Chris stepping out of meetings.

Oral argument — Acdmy of Allergy v. Quest

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2021

all times during the period of the violation. … before the limitations period is the overt act a new specific act or word of refusal is required during the limitations period the idea true for all any trust cases for the limitations issue is is there

Oral argument — Tobar v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2023

Was there any indication that that's how the I.J. was acting, or was the I.J. just trying to find out, like when we're talking about a long time, what does long mean? … Well, Your Honor, the IJ did specifically state that, I already read that, again, this court will use this to show that a significant period, to show that this is a significant period of time, referring

Oral argument — Smith v. Heap

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2022

Constable Smith had his hands held in the air. He was not wearing a service weapon and he was obeying all commands. … Also, Constable Heap was statutorily responsible for his deputy's official acts.

Oral argument — Morgan v. Chapman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2026

Judge Wilson, I appreciate your comments, but it doesn't do pain management at all. There's nothing in the newspaper article that suggests... I know you say that, but that's not the point. … They're charging, the charge is a violation of the Texas Medical Practice Act.

Oral argument — Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated v. Texas Alco

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2016

If between the gap of August 7, when the State answered and this case started, and November 18, that time period is the relevant time period for timeliness. … Water Act.

Oral argument — Lupis v. City of Texas City

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2024

I mean, it's almost like a prestigious kind of comedy act. And, uh, the, uh, but the officer detains the person who wasn't the target of the warrant for a short period of time. … That is something that would, we would like the opportunity to for leave to amend to clean up the complaint.

Oral argument — Sahara Health Care, Inc. v. Alex Azar, II, Secreta

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2019

The Affordable Care Act had nothing to do with Subsection F. Subsection F long predated the Affordable Care Act, and the Affordable Care Act made no changes to Subsection F. … Do you have any comments on Hawkins? The Hawkins case. I apologize, Your Honor, I'm not aware of that. Personal care products. That's the personal care. Oh, personal care products.

Oral argument — Miniex v. Houston Housing Authority

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 31, 2022

Repayment, and everything is stated clean. What she's providing is the indicia of False Claims Act violations. What's your best case? I'm interrupting just because you're good and time runs out. … Miniaks forwarded to herself in the, you know, six or seven month period before she was terminated in December of 2016.

Oral argument — OnPath Fed Crdt Un v. US Dept of Trea

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2022

Over a period of time, they received approximately $12 million in funds from the CDFI institution. … Do they just draw the short straw and get this audit, or is everybody typically audited over a period of time?

Oral argument — Haygood v. Morrison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2024

Section 1988 and the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices Act. Love that. … The Sheremy decision by the Louisiana Supreme Court held as much, and the district court misapplied that law and created a clear air of law and abused its discretion in doing so.