Documents

Oral argument — XPO Logistics Worldwide v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2018

They said your experience in air TDEF, so what are you going to do about it? Crowley comes in with 34 new references and it comes in with more information. … Let me point out as well that there was no change to the RFP here, so we aren't in a blue and gold situation or a comment situation.

Oral argument — CANCER RESEARCH v. BARR LABS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2010

That second part is the answer to your question, Judge Prost, which is the public rights are not some amorphous rights in the air to have the patent end early. … And if their behavior was objectively unreasonable, then I submit there are thousands of patent prosecutors out there during that time period who are acting equally unreasonably because the evidence of

Oral argument — Womack v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2020

It boils down to the opinion in Scharf versus the Department of the Air Force, which basically says that it is not necessary for a judge, for an administrative judge, to find that the appellant is intentionally … And third, the resignation was the result of improper acts by the agency. But isn't there something curious? You can't dig it out from the record.

Oral argument — Ruggieri v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2006

There was a period of time, then, that by a stroke of the pen they could have acted. There may have been, but there's no law that. You say there may have been. … You do agree, do you not, that there was a period of time when the agency could have acted?

Oral argument — Allen v. USPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2006

We should act as if that doesn't exist. … We're not sort of doing this on a clean slate. How are we to review what a deciding official decides if we don't know what he would have decided? Put it this way.

Oral argument — Reddick v. FDIC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2015

And what's the operative legal act there? The operative legal act is accepting. How can he create an operative legal act on part of the agency? … I mean, it's undisputed he continued to the end of the original two-year period, correct? Correct.

Oral argument — Saunders Group v. Comfortrac

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2007

Period. Full stop. That's the first sentence of the summary. … For example, Loveless, that is a unique double-acting cylinder, and it's a patent that claims a novel use of an O-ring seal and a double-acting cylinder.

Oral argument — Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2017

It's blowing in the air. And then the uncle comes along and says, it's ours. So your view is that Petrohan was stuck with the... had to believe that you were right when you said it was yours. … It was outside of the statute of limitations whether it was at the beginning or the end of the time period in question.

Oral argument — MID CONTINENT NAIL CORP v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2013

However, this brings us to the discussion had in the original investigation of the nails case during the period for scope comments when an importer came in and asked for, made the argument that its tool … Do you have any comment you'd like to make with respect to the validity, the relevance of any of those factors? Absolutely.

Oral argument — Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2016

There was a comment about whether we practiced precisely the claims that were asserted. … And just to summarize what your Honor said, in one case there is placent, which specifically refers… It's for a large, an air conditioning unit, it's a wall-mounted unit.

Oral argument — Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2020

The board wasn't acting as an advocate in any way. It was acting as a decision maker, just as courts do all the time. … I think we've already made arguments in our brief as to why the PTAB did not air, and I don't think they aired even if you apply Phillips.

Oral argument — Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2020

The board wasn't acting as an advocate in any way. It was acting as a decision maker, just as courts do all the time. … I think we've already made arguments in our brief as to why the PTAB did not air, and I don't think they aired even if you apply Phillips.

Oral argument — VLSI Technology LLC v. Patent Quality Assurance LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2026

But even if this court were writing on a clean slate, would say, you know, we don't think it was necessary to join Intel. … I'd like to begin with the comment that somehow this case is different.

Oral argument — Dupuch-Carron v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2020

Did he mean return by air? Did he mean return in person? What I'm trying to get at is whether or not I'm trying to indicate to you that I don't agree with you that the word return is never ambiguous. … of the Act.

Oral argument — FULBRIGHT v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2012

Irwin was a Civil Rights Act case, also not a case involving Section 2501. … Now, granted, if Congress doesn't act, typically they're okay with whatever that prior legal decision was.

Oral argument — Oman Fasteners, LLC v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2024

We are the intended beneficiary, or one of the intended beneficiaries, of the remedial effects of anti-dumping and countervailing due to laws that are included in the Tariff Act. … That proves that had I known how bad the penalty would be, I would have come clean.

Oral argument — US Inventor, Inc. v. PTO

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2025

So the question of whether the agency acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying the petition is not before this panel. … There was some discussion that a veto power was in the air, but there was no express mention of U.S. environment. But no mention of your petition or a veto idea in the NRPM?

Oral argument — McKinney v. McDonald

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2015

We agree that it was beneficial, and we don't argue with the substance of the period itself, but the DVA cannot act arbitrarily when it decides to act. … That's the whole reason we have the notice and comment period. All right. I'll continue. So the DVA's errors got us here.

Oral argument — Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2020

The board wasn't acting as an advocate in any way. It was acting as a decision maker, just as courts do all the time. … I think we've already made arguments in our brief as to why the PTAB did not air, and I don't think they aired even if you apply Phillips.

Oral argument — John Bean Technologies v. Morris & Associates Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2018

That was a small dispute involving a component, an air header on an auger chiller, and that was resolved through communications between the parties, between executives of the two parties, and it was resolved … The certificate was issued on May 9th, 2014, and that's the date on which the damages period that's alleged in the complaint begins.