Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.68s

  • Oral argument — United States v. Charles Yi

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2012

    We don't have that because the statute under the Clean Air Act does not require knowledge of illegality. All it requires is knowledge of asbestos. … But to address your comment directly, it also did not support that there was deliberate avoidance because as the cases say, deliberate avoidance is an active act. It's an intentional act.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Canizalex-Cardena

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2023

    It was filled with air fresheners as an obvious attempt to try to defeat a canine search. … Okay, there's one on the car washers, give those little wafer air freshers that you put on the floor of your car. It's not that uncommon for people to have multiple air fresheners.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Betts v. Brennan

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2021

    Just a few comments, Your Honor. I just want to rehash what's already been argued. My colleague makes a number of points about what officers could have done. … It's clean in that way. It's a nice, clean record. This one's got a clean record for the court. Right. And it's on summary judgment.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Nancy Oliver

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 26, 2010

    It can't be how Congress intended to deal with this, because Congress singled out these wastes specifically in the Clean Air Act, and the exemption that the construction of the exemption that the Olivers … Air Act.

    24 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2005

    Worthy of comment. We do think it is an extraterritorial application. That's the argument. … Well, I think the act is written. I'm sorry? I think the act is written.

    55 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Concerned Household Electricity Consumer's Council v. EPA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2023

    Because the 2009 endangerment finding touches off a regulatory cascade or tsunami that drives regulation throughout the Clean Air Act, with the exception of the areas carved out by the UR decision. … Other endangerment findings under other parts of the Clean Air Act rest and incorporate the 2009 greenhouse gas endangerment finding.

    20 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc v. Gina Raimondo

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2022

    Our view is that the comment period was open, the omnibus amendment was still being- So the I should say evaluated as legality by the government, but in that time period, before the government had made … I think we provide evidence in the briefing of other industries, including in the EPA, Clean Air Act, and Clean Water Act, where there are direct statutory authorization. Oh, of course.

    59 min of audio
  • Oral argument — David Vance Gardner v. MeTV

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2024

    I just want to clean up a few things about what is and is not alleged in the amended complaint. … How do you read the Video Privacy Protection Act?

    24 min of audio
  • Oral argument — BALDWIN v. VA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2011

    For the period during which he was retired? I mean, if he had gotten what he sought at the get-go, i.e., a retirement, he wouldn't have been getting back pay for that period. … But if they had done that, there would have been a cost in the day, and then they clearly couldn't act retroactively.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Environmental Integrity Proj v. EPA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2015

    EPA acted reasonably and in accordance with the Clean Air Act when it approved Texas's flexible permit program. … If the owner does not comply with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, they're in violation of the Clean Air Act and would be subject to an enforcement action, whether that...

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Port of Houston v. Louis Dreyfus

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2023

    If the Hughesian period and the instruction to the jury is, you get two months at the end of the lease period and then that's the end of the Hughesian period, you need to tell, I have that dispute in front … In Texas, I would be driving it for 1,000 miles without air conditioning, right?

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Aaron Eaton v. Eynon

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2023

    There was periodic cleaning and various things and they were not successful, certainly according to your client's version of the facts. … One was by a nurse who said, I did an air test and it was even better than last time. We have no medical records about that test. We have no idea what that means.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Kazenercom Too v. Ibar Development, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2011

    Currently, it sets out the 30-plus instances of mail and wire fraud conducted over a four-plus-year period, including time period after this action was filed. … It's not easy to satisfy the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — National Wildlife v. Secretary of State

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2020

    There were nine criteria in Clean Water Act section 402B 1 through 9. … Clean Water Act.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Black Elk Energy Offshore

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2017

    Subsection eight, compliance with the Clean Air Act. Are you familiar with the principle Aes Deme Ganaris in statutory interpretation? Your Honor, I... … That would violate, if that violates the Clean Water Act, they're violating a regulation, right? Well, it's not a regulation under OXLA, but... Of course it is.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — TSGInc v. USenvironmentalprotection

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

    This case arises from a determination made by EPA under a federal regulation promulgated under the Clean Air Act. This is a preliminary question. … But for an exception to, for example, in a new source performance standard case, that is a different process, but also under the Clean Air Act Section 111 instead of 112, I've seen an exception like that

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — American Trucking Associations v. The City of Los Angeles

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2011

    May it please the Court, I represent the Environmental Intervenors, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Sierra Club, and the Coalition for Clean Air. … One, the concession agreement imposes maintenance requirements on LMCs, and the district court found that ongoing maintenance is critical to the port being able to achieve its clean air objectives.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Baptiste v. Bethlehem Landfill Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2019

    Before this, the tactic du jour was the idea that these common law claims are preempted by the Clean Air Act. … In that case, this court rejected the argument that these claims were displaced by the Clean Air Act.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Cortes Nava

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2025

    I think that the nature of the air here and the extent to which it was emphasized is what makes this plain and clear air for the court. … And those factors include the extent of the comments, whether the inference was stressed, and the weight of the evidence.

    21 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Sierra Club v. ICG Hazard

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2013

    The discharges violate Kentucky's State Surface Mining Act standard and the Clean Water Act. … Mining Act that you can't use that act to modify or supersede the Clean Water Act.

    41 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.