Documents

Oral argument — In Re Thomas C.Wettach

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 23, 2015

But the $1.2 million would account for all four years, and all four years did not fall within the look-back period because of this. But there had to be a 48-month period there, counsel. … There has to be a four-year period. There was a 48-month period. There's no question about that.

Oral argument — Lutz v. Portfolio Recovery Associates

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2022

far as I know under the UCC, and so therefore the notion that it could be negotiated as that other meaning is, which applies to negotiable instruments, like endorsing a check, you know, to pay your dry cleaning … Because you look at the time period when the loan was actually created, and that's what determines it.

Oral argument — In Re Liquidation Trustof Hechinger Investment Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

A couple comments. If you look through the timing of all of these cases, while summary judgment was being briefed, the bondholder case was on appeal. … It's nonsensical to think that somehow or another, LGP was acting at arm's length with regard to Builder Square, but was not acting at arm's length with regard to the Hechinger Board.

Oral argument — George v. Rehiel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2012

But yes, I do think we would take the view that the acts of the Philadelphia Police, where there's no allegation of and no evidence of any kind of formal legal relationship between them, no one's acting … We don't take any view about the lawfulness of the period. I'm sorry. We don't take any view in this appeal.

Oral argument — Lesherv.Law Office Of Mitchell N.Kay Pc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2011

He did comment on that. … The problem I have in this case, Your Honor, is Mitchell K doesn't come clean on his role in the process.

Oral argument — Council Treev.USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2010

It's a very important case for the Administrative Procedure Act and for Section 309J of the Communications Act. … period.

Oral argument — Louisiana Forestry Association Inc Vs. Secretary United States Department of Labor

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 31, 2013

It would be condoning an unlawful act. … So you didn't go through notice and comment to abrogate 2008. Oh, yes we did. Notice and comment to put in place 2011, right? A replacement rule. Right.

Oral argument — In Re Wilton Armetale Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2020

It acts on behalf of the estate. … And if it's true, then it means that the trustee is acting illegally.

Oral argument — Tyger v. Precision Drilling

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2023

For example, one, and it's a snapshot, clean off all greases, lubricants, and chemical residue before eating, drinking, smoking, and or going home. … During the relevant period of this, that would cover this case, did Precision have a rule that required folks to change on the premises? No. During this relevant period, they did not? They did not.

Oral argument — United States v. Vicaulic Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2016

You say that based on the comments that the judge made on the record, that you were not alerted to the fact that you have serious problems with your initial filing? … It wasn't just an assumption that he pulled out of thin air.

Oral argument — Comm of PA v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2018

One of which is by adjudication and the other is notice and comment rulemaking. … In that case, the Mines Act and its implementing regulations authorized mine inspections and set for health standards.

Oral argument — Marshall Bastien v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2014

He's been back to Haiti only one time in that period of time. … Could you comment on the judge's comment on the expert testimony?

Oral argument — Moses Taylor Foundation v. ConverysProselect Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2022

And then the court goes on to say you haven't identified any damages because it's all just in the air whether you're going to ever face a consequence from a diminution in your coverage. … The breach of contract is because, well, technically, yes, they had the duty to, and I'm sorry, I know I have it in here, to act in our best interest.

Oral argument — Revock v. Cowpet Bay West

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2016

But before that you have to look at that time period, that very brief time period of what happened when the original request went on file. … That's correct, and there is no dispute that the comments of others on that blog are protected by the Federal Communications Decency Act, I believe is the title.

Oral argument — A.S.Miller v. Smithkline Beecham

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2014

Case after case says you can have relation back as long, even if the pleading, the complaint has been dismissed, it's been acted upon, has disappeared into thin air, as long as a case is pending somewhere … It was a Wage and Hour Act type case.

Oral argument — Carlyle Investment v. Moonmouth

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2014

It may be a winning argument, but it really wasn't fully aired in the district court, correct? With respect, Your Honor, it was fully aired. … I think the court decided the remand motion, period, and there's no reason to tar us with what was in papers that the district court never evidenced any consideration of.

Oral argument — etal_Public Interest Legal Foundation v. Secretary Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2024

The NVRA, according to this court in that case, the purpose is to act as a shield to protect the right to vote, not to act as a sword to pierce it. … This is discussing the 90-day quiet period before an election where systematic voter removals are prohibited.

Oral argument — Kevin Sapp v. Industrial Action Services LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2023

Now, it's mentioned in the Bus Air case that you cite. But wouldn't Kuhn be the biggest? This is governed by federal law, right? It is, yes. … Even though you're using Delaware law as the state law, this is proceeding under the Federal Arbitration Act. And you have to apply federal common law because you have to have a consistent standard.

Oral argument — Cigar Association of America Inc v. City of Phila

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 23, 2021

He said it three times in the course of his comments on the matter. He said that the preemptive scope is, quote, the areas that are specifically addressed by the bill. He said that three times. … I don't think the court can just discern out of the air that substantial economic harm is at issue. That's what plaintiffs have to prove.

Oral argument — Bornstein v. Monmouth County Sheriffs Office

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2016

Well, and she said, you know, there really is no deliberate indifference because that's usually a lengthy time period, et cetera, et cetera. … He was opining merely about whether or not your client acted reasonably or whether they acted unreasonably.